Literature DB >> 1629482

Test of a model of auditory object formation using intensity and interaural time difference discrimination.

W S Woods1, H S Colburn.   

Abstract

A model of auditory object formation and an experimental evaluation of the model are described. Specifically, predictions for intensity discrimination and interaural time difference discrimination for the central component of a three-component harmonic complex are evaluated empirically. The onset time of the central, target component is varied relative to the onset times of the remaining, interferer components in order to vary the degree of fusion (versus perceptual segregation) of the target and the interferers. The model, which is based on the idea of attenuation of the components in the nonattended auditory image (in the case of segregated images), predicts lower sensitivity to information at the target component for the fused versus segregated target, and equal sensitivities for completely segregated targets and targets presented in isolation. Results are presented for four subjects with component frequencies of 400, 600, and 800 Hz and with onset time differences of 0 or 250 ms. The target duration was always 100 ms and offset times were the same for all components. The subjective results were as expected, with synchronous onsets yielding one sound object, and asynchrony of the central component yielding two sound objects. Also, the empirical results on interference in the synchronous case were in qualitative agreement with the above predictions. However, significantly more interference was found than was predicted for both synchronous and asynchronous conditions. In fact, the amount of interference found contradicts the simple attenuation model of object formation.

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1629482     DOI: 10.1121/1.402926

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  17 in total

1.  Extracting binaural information from simultaneous targets and distractors: effects of amplitude modulation and asynchronous envelopes.

Authors:  Mark A Stellmack; Andrew J Byrne; Neal F Viemeister
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Binaural interference in lateralization thresholds for interaural time and level differences.

Authors:  Laurie M Heller; Virginia M Richards
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Binaural interference in the free field.

Authors:  Naomi B H Croghan; D Wesley Grantham
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Measures of extents of laterality for high-frequency "transposed" stimuli under conditions of binaural interference.

Authors:  Leslie R Bernstein; Constantine Trahiotis
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Binaural comodulation masking release: effects of masker interaural correlation.

Authors:  Joseph W Hall; Emily Buss; John H Grose
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Listening to speech in the presence of other sounds.

Authors:  C J Darwin
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2008-03-12       Impact factor: 6.237

7.  Listening to every other word: examining the strength of linkage variables in forming streams of speech.

Authors:  Gerald Kidd; Virginia Best; Christine R Mason
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Localization interference between components in an auditory scene.

Authors:  Adrian K C Lee; Ade Deane-Pratt; Barbara G Shinn-Cunningham
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Spectrotemporal weighting of binaural cues: Effects of a diotic interferer on discrimination of dynamic interaural differences.

Authors:  Jacqueline M Bibee; G Christopher Stecker
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Attention in neglect and extinction: assessing the degree of correspondence between visual and auditory impairments using matched tasks.

Authors:  Doug J K Barrett; A Mark Edmondson-Jones; Deborah A Hall
Journal:  J Clin Exp Neuropsychol       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 2.475

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.