Literature DB >> 27033087

Six Degrees of Auditory Spatial Separation.

Simon Carlile1,2, Alex Fox3, Emily Orchard-Mills3,4, Johahn Leung3, David Alais4.   

Abstract

The location of a sound is derived computationally from acoustical cues rather than being inherent in the topography of the input signal, as in vision. Since Lord Rayleigh, the descriptions of that representation have swung between "labeled line" and "opponent process" models. Employing a simple variant of a two-point separation judgment using concurrent speech sounds, we found that spatial discrimination thresholds changed nonmonotonically as a function of the overall separation. Rather than increasing with separation, spatial discrimination thresholds first declined as two-point separation increased before reaching a turning point and increasing thereafter with further separation. This "dipper" function, with a minimum at 6 ° of separation, was seen for regions around the midline as well as for more lateral regions (30 and 45 °). The discrimination thresholds for the binaural localization cues were linear over the same range, so these cannot explain the shape of these functions. These data and a simple computational model indicate that the perception of auditory space involves a local code or multichannel mapping emerging subsequent to the binaural cue coding.

Entities:  

Keywords:  auditory localization; auditory spatial perception; sensory channel processing

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27033087      PMCID: PMC4854823          DOI: 10.1007/s10162-016-0560-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol        ISSN: 1438-7573


  61 in total

Review 1.  Mechanisms of sound localization in mammals.

Authors:  Benedikt Grothe; Michael Pecka; David McAlpine
Journal:  Physiol Rev       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 37.312

2.  Difference thresholds for interaural delay.

Authors:  E R Hafter; J De Maio; W S Hellman
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1975-01       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Speech localization in a multitalker mixture.

Authors:  Norbert Kopco; Virginia Best; Simon Carlile
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  The three-channel model of sound localization mechanisms: interaural level differences.

Authors:  Rachel N Dingle; Susan E Hall; Dennis P Phillips
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 5.  Psychophysics and neuronal bases of sound localization in humans.

Authors:  Jyrki Ahveninen; Norbert Kopčo; Iiro P Jääskeläinen
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2013-07-22       Impact factor: 3.208

6.  On the minimum audible angle--a decision theory approach.

Authors:  W M Hartmann; B Raked
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1989-05       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Discrimination of interaural differences of level as a function of frequency.

Authors:  W A Yost; R H Dye
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1988-05       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Contrast masking in human vision.

Authors:  G E Legge; J M Foley
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am       Date:  1980-12

9.  A 'dipper' function for texture discrimination based on orientation variance.

Authors:  Michael Morgan; Charles Chubb; Joshua A Solomon
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2008-08-22       Impact factor: 2.240

10.  Decoding sound source location and separation using neural population activity patterns.

Authors:  Mitchell L Day; Bertrand Delgutte
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2013-10-02       Impact factor: 6.167

View more
  5 in total

1.  Adaptive spatial filtering improves speech reception in noise while preserving binaural cues.

Authors:  Susan R S Bissmeyer; Raymond L Goldsworthy
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Spatial variation in signal and sensory precision both constrain auditory acuity at high frequencies.

Authors:  Andrew D Brown; Victor Benichoux; Heath G Jones; Kelsey L Anbuhl; Daniel J Tollin
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2018-10-04       Impact factor: 3.208

3.  Effects of interaural decoherence on sensitivity to interaural level differences across frequency.

Authors:  Andrew D Brown; Daniel J Tollin
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2021-06       Impact factor: 2.482

4.  Neurons in primary auditory cortex represent sound source location in a cue-invariant manner.

Authors:  Katherine C Wood; Stephen M Town; Jennifer K Bizley
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2019-07-09       Impact factor: 14.919

5.  Multisensory stimuli improve relative localisation judgments compared to unisensory auditory or visual stimuli.

Authors:  Laura C A Freeman; Katherine C Wood; Jennifer K Bizley
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 1.840

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.