Literature DB >> 23015431

Nothing is irrelevant in a noisy world: sensory illusions reveal obligatory within-and across-modality integration.

Jennifer K Bizley1, Barbara G Shinn-Cunningham, Adrian K C Lee.   

Abstract

In the "flash-beep illusion," a single light flash is perceived as multiple flashes when presented in close temporal proximity to multiple auditory beeps. Accounts of this illusion argue that temporal auditory information interferes with visual information because temporal acuity is better in audition than vision. However, it may also be that whenever there are multiple sensory inputs, the interference caused by a to-be-ignored stimulus on an attended stimulus depends on the likelihood that the stimuli are perceived as coming from a single distal source. Here we explore, in human observers, perceptual interactions between competing auditory and visual inputs while varying spatial proximity, which affects object formation. When two spatially separated streams are presented in the same (visual or auditory) modality, temporal judgments about a target stream from one direction are biased by the content of the competing distractor stream. Cross-modally, auditory streams from both target and distractor directions bias the perceived number of events in a target visual stream; however, importantly, the auditory stream from the target direction influences visual judgments more than does the auditory stream from the opposite hemifield. As in the original flash-beep illusion, visual streams weakly influence auditory judgments, regardless of spatial proximity. We also find that perceptual interference in the flash-beep illusion is similar to within-modality interference from a competing same-modality stream. Results reveal imperfect and obligatory within- and across-modality integration of information, and hint that the strength of these interactions depends on object binding.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23015431      PMCID: PMC3489264          DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2495-12.2012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  30 in total

Review 1.  Selectively attending to auditory objects.

Authors:  C Alain; S R Arnott
Journal:  Front Biosci       Date:  2000-01-01

2.  Sound alters visual evoked potentials in humans.

Authors:  L Shams; Y Kamitani; S Thompson; S Shimojo
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  2001-12-04       Impact factor: 1.837

3.  Evidence for auditory feature integration with spatially distributed items.

Authors:  M D Hall; R E Pastore; B E Acker; W Huang
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2000-08

4.  Visual illusion induced by sound.

Authors:  Ladan Shams; Yukiyasu Kamitani; Shinsuke Shimojo
Journal:  Brain Res Cogn Brain Res       Date:  2002-06

5.  Sound-induced illusory flash perception: role of gamma band responses.

Authors:  Joydeep Bhattacharya; Ladan Shams; Shinsuke Shimojo
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  2002-10-07       Impact factor: 1.837

6.  The ventriloquist effect results from near-optimal bimodal integration.

Authors:  David Alais; David Burr
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2004-02-03       Impact factor: 10.834

7.  Cross-modal enhancement of perceived brightness: sensory interaction versus response bias.

Authors:  Eric C Odgaard; Yoav Arieh; Lawrence E Marks
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2003-01

8.  Brighter noise: sensory enhancement of perceived loudness by concurrent visual stimulation.

Authors:  Eric C Odgaard; Yoav Arieh; Lawrence E Marks
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 3.282

9.  Hearing lips and seeing voices.

Authors:  H McGurk; J MacDonald
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1976 Dec 23-30       Impact factor: 49.962

10.  Factors influencing audiovisual fission and fusion illusions.

Authors:  Tobias S Andersen; Kaisa Tiippana; Mikko Sams
Journal:  Brain Res Cogn Brain Res       Date:  2004-11
View more
  13 in total

1.  A standing posture is associated with increased susceptibility to the sound-induced flash illusion in fall-prone older adults.

Authors:  John Stapleton; Annalisa Setti; Emer P Doheny; Rose Anne Kenny; Fiona N Newell
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-11-02       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Comparison of congruence judgment and auditory localization tasks for assessing the spatial limits of visual capture.

Authors:  Adam K Bosen; Justin T Fleming; Sarah E Brown; Paul D Allen; William E O'Neill; Gary D Paige
Journal:  Biol Cybern       Date:  2016-11-04       Impact factor: 2.086

3.  Audio-visual spatial alignment improves integration in the presence of a competing audio-visual stimulus.

Authors:  Justin T Fleming; Abigail L Noyce; Barbara G Shinn-Cunningham
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2020-06-20       Impact factor: 3.139

4.  Resting state network topology of the ferret brain.

Authors:  Zhe Charles Zhou; Andrew P Salzwedel; Susanne Radtke-Schuller; Yuhui Li; Kristin K Sellers; John H Gilmore; Yen-Yu Ian Shih; Flavio Fröhlich; Wei Gao
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2016-09-02       Impact factor: 6.556

5.  Short-term memory stores organized by information domain.

Authors:  Abigail L Noyce; Nishmar Cestero; Barbara G Shinn-Cunningham; David C Somers
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 2.199

6.  Visual sensitivity is a stronger determinant of illusory processes than auditory cue parameters in the sound-induced flash illusion.

Authors:  Daniel P Kumpik; Helen E Roberts; Andrew J King; Jennifer K Bizley
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2014-06-24       Impact factor: 2.240

7.  The cross-modal double flash illusion depends on featural similarity between cross-modal inducers.

Authors:  Warrick Roseboom; Takahiro Kawabe; Shin'ya Nishida
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2013-12-06       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Auditory selective attention is enhanced by a task-irrelevant temporally coherent visual stimulus in human listeners.

Authors:  Ross K Maddox; Huriye Atilgan; Jennifer K Bizley; Adrian K C Lee
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2015-02-05       Impact factor: 8.140

9.  Aging and audio-visual and multi-cue integration in motion.

Authors:  Eugenie Roudaia; Allison B Sekuler; Patrick J Bennett; Robert Sekuler
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2013-05-23

10.  Global workspace dynamics: cortical "binding and propagation" enables conscious contents.

Authors:  Bernard J Baars; Stan Franklin; Thomas Zoega Ramsoy
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2013-05-28
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.