Literature DB >> 19884341

Dephosphorylation of gamma H2A by Glc7/protein phosphatase 1 promotes recovery from inhibition of DNA replication.

Marco Bazzi1, Davide Mantiero, Camilla Trovesi, Giovanna Lucchini, Maria Pia Longhese.   

Abstract

Replication fork stalling caused by deoxynucleotide depletion triggers Rad53 phosphorylation and subsequent checkpoint activation, which in turn play a crucial role in maintaining functional DNA replication forks. How cells regulate checkpoint deactivation after inhibition of DNA replication is poorly understood. Here, we show that the budding yeast protein phosphatase Glc7/protein phosphatase 1 (PP1) promotes disappearance of phosphorylated Rad53 and recovery from replication fork stalling caused by the deoxynucleoside triphosphate (dNTP) synthesis inhibitor hydroxyurea (HU). Glc7 is also required for recovery from a double-strand break-induced checkpoint, while it is dispensable for checkpoint inactivation during methylmethane sulfonate exposure, which instead requires the protein phosphatases Pph3, Ptc2, and Ptc3. Furthermore, Glc7 counteracts in vivo histone H2A phosphorylation on serine 129 (gamma H2A) and dephosphorylates gamma H2A in vitro. Finally, the replication recovery defects of HU-treated glc7 mutants are partially rescued by Rad53 inactivation or lack of gamma H2A formation, and the latter also counteracts hyperphosphorylated Rad53 accumulation. We therefore propose that Glc7 activity promotes recovery from replication fork stalling caused by dNTP depletion and that gamma H2A dephosphorylation is a critical Glc7 function in this process.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 19884341      PMCID: PMC2798293          DOI: 10.1128/MCB.01000-09

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Cell Biol        ISSN: 0270-7306            Impact factor:   4.272


  42 in total

1.  Pachytene exit controlled by reversal of Mek1-dependent phosphorylation.

Authors:  J M Bailis; G S Roeder
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2000-04-14       Impact factor: 41.582

2.  DNA polymerase stabilization at stalled replication forks requires Mec1 and the RecQ helicase Sgs1.

Authors:  Jennifer A Cobb; Lotte Bjergbaek; Kenji Shimada; Christian Frei; Susan M Gasser
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2003-08-15       Impact factor: 11.598

3.  The checkpoint protein Ddc2, functionally related to S. pombe Rad26, interacts with Mec1 and is regulated by Mec1-dependent phosphorylation in budding yeast.

Authors:  V Paciotti; M Clerici; G Lucchini; M P Longhese
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2000-08-15       Impact factor: 11.361

4.  Regulation of DNA replication fork progression through damaged DNA by the Mec1/Rad53 checkpoint.

Authors:  J A Tercero; J F Diffley
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2001-08-02       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  Remarkable similarities between yeast and mammalian protein phosphatases.

Authors:  P Cohen; D L Schelling; M J Stark
Journal:  FEBS Lett       Date:  1989-07-03       Impact factor: 4.124

6.  Reconstitution of an efficient thymidine salvage pathway in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  Laurence Vernis; Jure Piskur; John F X Diffley
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2003-10-01       Impact factor: 16.971

7.  Distribution and dynamics of chromatin modification induced by a defined DNA double-strand break.

Authors:  Robert Shroff; Ayelet Arbel-Eden; Duane Pilch; Grzegorz Ira; William M Bonner; John H Petrini; James E Haber; Michael Lichten
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2004-10-05       Impact factor: 10.834

8.  Recovery from DNA damage checkpoint arrest by PP1-mediated inhibition of Chk1.

Authors:  Nicole R den Elzen; Matthew J O'Connell
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2004-02-05       Impact factor: 11.598

9.  Checkpoint-mediated control of replisome-fork association and signalling in response to replication pausing.

Authors:  Chiara Lucca; Fabio Vanoli; Cecilia Cotta-Ramusino; Achille Pellicioli; Giordano Liberi; James Haber; Marco Foiani
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  2004-02-12       Impact factor: 9.867

10.  The DNA replication checkpoint response stabilizes stalled replication forks.

Authors:  M Lopes; C Cotta-Ramusino; A Pellicioli; G Liberi; P Plevani; M Muzi-Falconi; C S Newlon; M Foiani
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2001-08-02       Impact factor: 49.962

View more
  24 in total

Review 1.  What goes on must come off: phosphatases gate-crash the DNA damage response.

Authors:  Dong-Hyun Lee; Dipanjan Chowdhury
Journal:  Trends Biochem Sci       Date:  2011-09-18       Impact factor: 13.807

2.  A new Riff: Rif1 eats its cake and has it too.

Authors:  Grzegorz Ira; André Nussenzweig
Journal:  EMBO Rep       Date:  2014-04-27       Impact factor: 8.807

3.  Loss of H3 K79 trimethylation leads to suppression of Rtt107-dependent DNA damage sensitivity through the translesion synthesis pathway.

Authors:  Nancy Lévesque; Grace P Leung; Alexandra K Fok; Thorsten I Schmidt; Michael S Kobor
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2010-09-01       Impact factor: 5.157

4.  Yeast PP4 interacts with ATR homolog Ddc2-Mec1 and regulates checkpoint signaling.

Authors:  Nicole Hustedt; Andrew Seeber; Ragna Sack; Monika Tsai-Pflugfelder; Bhupinder Bhullar; Hanneke Vlaming; Fred van Leeuwen; Aude Guénolé; Haico van Attikum; Rohith Srivas; Trey Ideker; Kenji Shimada; Susan M Gasser
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2014-12-18       Impact factor: 17.970

5.  Deregulated Ras signaling compromises DNA damage checkpoint recovery in S. cerevisiae.

Authors:  Matthew D Wood; Yolanda Sanchez
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2010-08-17       Impact factor: 4.534

Review 6.  Dynamics of DNA damage response proteins at DNA breaks: a focus on protein modifications.

Authors:  Sophie E Polo; Stephen P Jackson
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2011-03-01       Impact factor: 11.361

7.  KRCC1: A potential therapeutic target in ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Shailendra Kumar Dhar Dwivedi; Khader Shameer; Anindya Dey; Soumyajit Banerjee Mustafi; Xunhao Xiong; Udayan Bhattacharya; Fiifi Neizer-Ashun; Geeta Rao; Yue Wang; Cristina Ivan; Da Yang; Joel T Dudley; Chao Xu; Jonathan D Wren; Priyabrata Mukherjee; Resham Bhattacharya
Journal:  FASEB J       Date:  2019-12-23       Impact factor: 5.191

8.  Pph3 dephosphorylation of Rad53 is required for cell recovery from MMS-induced DNA damage in Candida albicans.

Authors:  Haitao Wang; Jiaxin Gao; Wanjie Li; Ada Hang-Heng Wong; Kangdi Hu; Kun Chen; Yue Wang; Jianli Sang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-05-14       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Replication checkpoint: tuning and coordination of replication forks in s phase.

Authors:  Nicole Hustedt; Susan M Gasser; Kenji Shimada
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2013-08-19       Impact factor: 4.096

10.  The DNA damage checkpoint response to replication stress: A Game of Forks.

Authors:  Rachel Jossen; Rodrigo Bermejo
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2013-03-13       Impact factor: 4.599

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.