Literature DB >> 21363960

Dynamics of DNA damage response proteins at DNA breaks: a focus on protein modifications.

Sophie E Polo1, Stephen P Jackson.   

Abstract

Genome integrity is constantly monitored by sophisticated cellular networks, collectively termed the DNA damage response (DDR). A common feature of DDR proteins is their mobilization in response to genotoxic stress. Here, we outline how the development of various complementary methodologies has provided valuable insights into the spatiotemporal dynamics of DDR protein assembly/disassembly at sites of DNA strand breaks in eukaryotic cells. Considerable advances have also been made in understanding the underlying molecular mechanisms for these events, with post-translational modifications of DDR factors being shown to play prominent roles in controlling the formation of foci in response to DNA-damaging agents. We review these regulatory mechanisms and discuss their biological significance to the DDR.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21363960      PMCID: PMC3049283          DOI: 10.1101/gad.2021311

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genes Dev        ISSN: 0890-9369            Impact factor:   11.361


  363 in total

1.  Distinct roles for the RSC and Swi/Snf ATP-dependent chromatin remodelers in DNA double-strand break repair.

Authors:  Bob Chai; Jian Huang; Bradley R Cairns; Brehon C Laurent
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2005-07-15       Impact factor: 11.361

2.  Recruitment of the type B histone acetyltransferase Hat1p to chromatin is linked to DNA double-strand breaks.

Authors:  Song Qin; Mark R Parthun
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 4.272

3.  Interplay between Ino80 and Swr1 chromatin remodeling enzymes regulates cell cycle checkpoint adaptation in response to DNA damage.

Authors:  Manolis Papamichos-Chronakis; Jocelyn E Krebs; Craig L Peterson
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2006-09-01       Impact factor: 11.361

Review 4.  Poly(ADP-ribosyl)ation reactions in the regulation of nuclear functions.

Authors:  D D'Amours; S Desnoyers; I D'Silva; G G Poirier
Journal:  Biochem J       Date:  1999-09-01       Impact factor: 3.857

5.  Sensitivity and selectivity of the DNA damage sensor responsible for activating p53-dependent G1 arrest.

Authors:  L C Huang; K C Clarkin; G M Wahl
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1996-05-14       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Acetylation by Tip60 is required for selective histone variant exchange at DNA lesions.

Authors:  Thomas Kusch; Laurence Florens; W Hayes Macdonald; Selene K Swanson; Robert L Glaser; John R Yates; Susan M Abmayr; Michael P Washburn; Jerry L Workman
Journal:  Science       Date:  2004-11-04       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 7.  The mechanism of double-strand DNA break repair by the nonhomologous DNA end-joining pathway.

Authors:  Michael R Lieber
Journal:  Annu Rev Biochem       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 23.643

8.  Rnf8 deficiency impairs class switch recombination, spermatogenesis, and genomic integrity and predisposes for cancer.

Authors:  Li Li; Marie-Jo Halaby; Anne Hakem; Renato Cardoso; Samah El Ghamrasni; Shane Harding; Norman Chan; Robert Bristow; Otto Sanchez; Daniel Durocher; Razqallah Hakem
Journal:  J Exp Med       Date:  2010-04-12       Impact factor: 14.307

Review 9.  How the fanconi anemia pathway guards the genome.

Authors:  George-Lucian Moldovan; Alan D D'Andrea
Journal:  Annu Rev Genet       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 16.830

10.  High-resolution profiling of gammaH2AX around DNA double strand breaks in the mammalian genome.

Authors:  Jason S Iacovoni; Pierre Caron; Imen Lassadi; Estelle Nicolas; Laurent Massip; Didier Trouche; Gaëlle Legube
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2010-04-01       Impact factor: 14.012

View more
  552 in total

1.  ATP hydrolysis by RAD50 protein switches MRE11 enzyme from endonuclease to exonuclease.

Authors:  Jerzy Majka; Brian Alford; Juan Ausio; Ron M Finn; Cynthia T McMurray
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2011-11-18       Impact factor: 5.157

2.  Role for Rif1 in the checkpoint response to damaged DNA in Xenopus egg extracts.

Authors:  Sanjay Kumar; Hae Yong Yoo; Akiko Kumagai; Anna Shevchenko; Andrej Shevchenko; William G Dunphy
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2012-03-15       Impact factor: 4.534

Review 3.  Crosstalk between the DNA damage response pathway and microRNAs.

Authors:  Cecil Han; Guohui Wan; Robert R Langley; Xinna Zhang; Xiongbin Lu
Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci       Date:  2012-03-20       Impact factor: 9.261

4.  Putative binding modes of Ku70-SAP domain with double strand DNA: a molecular modeling study.

Authors:  Shaowen Hu; Janice M Pluth; Francis A Cucinotta
Journal:  J Mol Model       Date:  2011-09-27       Impact factor: 1.810

Review 5.  More than just a focus: The chromatin response to DNA damage and its role in genome integrity maintenance.

Authors:  Jiri Lukas; Claudia Lukas; Jiri Bartek
Journal:  Nat Cell Biol       Date:  2011-10-03       Impact factor: 28.824

6.  Cdc45 protein-single-stranded DNA interaction is important for stalling the helicase during replication stress.

Authors:  Irina Bruck; Daniel L Kaplan
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2013-02-04       Impact factor: 5.157

7.  Double duty: ZMYND8 in the DNA damage response and cancer.

Authors:  Fade Gong; Kyle M Miller
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2018-03-19       Impact factor: 4.534

Review 8.  Chronic oxidative damage together with genome repair deficiency in the neurons is a double whammy for neurodegeneration: Is damage response signaling a potential therapeutic target?

Authors:  Haibo Wang; Prakash Dharmalingam; Velmarini Vasquez; Joy Mitra; Istvan Boldogh; K S Rao; Thomas A Kent; Sankar Mitra; Muralidhar L Hegde
Journal:  Mech Ageing Dev       Date:  2016-09-20       Impact factor: 5.432

Review 9.  Clinically Applicable Inhibitors Impacting Genome Stability.

Authors:  Anu Prakash; Juan F Garcia-Moreno; James A L Brown; Emer Bourke
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2018-05-13       Impact factor: 4.411

10.  SUMOylation of hnRNP-K is required for p53-mediated cell-cycle arrest in response to DNA damage.

Authors:  Seong Won Lee; Moon Hee Lee; Jong Ho Park; Sung Hwan Kang; Hee Min Yoo; Seung Hyun Ka; Young Mi Oh; Young Joo Jeon; Chin Ha Chung
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2012-10-23       Impact factor: 11.598

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.