Literature DB >> 12912929

DNA polymerase stabilization at stalled replication forks requires Mec1 and the RecQ helicase Sgs1.

Jennifer A Cobb1, Lotte Bjergbaek, Kenji Shimada, Christian Frei, Susan M Gasser.   

Abstract

To ensure proper replication and segregation of the genome, eukaryotic cells have evolved surveillance systems that monitor and react to impaired replication fork progression. In budding yeast, the intra-S phase checkpoint responds to stalled replication forks by downregulating late-firing origins, preventing spindle elongation and allowing efficient resumption of DNA synthesis after recovery from stress. Mutations in this pathway lead to high levels of genomic instability, particularly in the presence of DNA damage. Here we demonstrate by chromatin immunoprecipitation that when yeast replication forks stall due to hydroxyurea (HU) treatment, DNA polymerases alpha and epsilon are stabilized for 40-60 min. This requires the activities of Sgs1, a member of the RecQ family of DNA helicases, and the ATM-related kinase Mec1, but not Rad53 activation. A model is proposed whereby Sgs1 helicase resolves aberrantly paired structures at stalled forks to maintain single-stranded DNA that allows RP-A and Mec1 to promote DNA polymerase association.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12912929      PMCID: PMC175781          DOI: 10.1093/emboj/cdg391

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  EMBO J        ISSN: 0261-4189            Impact factor:   11.598


  53 in total

1.  Cell cycle regulation of the endogenous wild type Bloom's syndrome DNA helicase.

Authors:  S Dutertre; M Ababou; R Onclercq; J Delic; B Chatton; C Jaulin; M Amor-Guéret
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  2000-05-25       Impact factor: 9.867

Review 2.  RecQ family helicases: roles in cancer and aging.

Authors:  J K Karow; L Wu; I D Hickson
Journal:  Curr Opin Genet Dev       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 5.578

3.  Phosphorylation of the replication protein A large subunit in the Saccharomyces cerevisiae checkpoint response.

Authors:  G S Brush; T J Kelly
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2000-10-01       Impact factor: 16.971

4.  Homologous recombination is responsible for cell death in the absence of the Sgs1 and Srs2 helicases.

Authors:  S Gangloff; C Soustelle; F Fabre
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 38.330

5.  The yeast Sgs1p helicase acts upstream of Rad53p in the DNA replication checkpoint and colocalizes with Rad53p in S-phase-specific foci.

Authors:  C Frei; S M Gasser
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2000-01-01       Impact factor: 11.361

6.  Importance of the Sgs1 helicase activity in DNA repair of Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  J Saffi; V R Pereira; J A Henriques
Journal:  Curr Genet       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 3.886

7.  Dpb11 controls the association between DNA polymerases alpha and epsilon and the autonomously replicating sequence region of budding yeast.

Authors:  H Masumoto; A Sugino; H Araki
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 4.272

8.  Activation of Rad53 kinase in response to DNA damage and its effect in modulating phosphorylation of the lagging strand DNA polymerase.

Authors:  A Pellicioli; C Lucca; G Liberi; F Marini; M Lopes; P Plevani; A Romano; P P Di Fiore; M Foiani
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  1999-11-15       Impact factor: 11.598

9.  Elevation of sister chromatid exchange in Saccharomyces cerevisiae sgs1 disruptants and the relevance of the disruptants as a system to evaluate mutations in Bloom's syndrome gene.

Authors:  F Onoda; M Seki; A Miyajima; T Enomoto
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  2000-04-28       Impact factor: 2.433

10.  A Mec1- and Rad53-dependent checkpoint controls late-firing origins of DNA replication.

Authors:  C Santocanale; J F Diffley
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1998-10-08       Impact factor: 49.962

View more
  174 in total

1.  Cyclin regulation by the s phase checkpoint.

Authors:  Gloria Palou; Roger Palou; Angel Guerra-Moreno; Alba Duch; Anna Travesa; David G Quintana
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2010-06-10       Impact factor: 5.157

2.  ATP-dependent chromatin remodeling factors tune S phase checkpoint activity.

Authors:  Tracey J Au; Jairo Rodriguez; Jack A Vincent; Toshio Tsukiyama
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2011-09-19       Impact factor: 4.272

3.  Keeping it together in times of stress: checkpoint function at stalled replication forks.

Authors:  Theresa J Berens; David P Toczyski
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2012-03-09       Impact factor: 17.970

4.  S-phase checkpoint genes safeguard high-fidelity sister chromatid cohesion.

Authors:  Cheryl D Warren; D Mark Eckley; Marina S Lee; Joseph S Hanna; Adam Hughes; Brian Peyser; Chunfa Jie; Rafael Irizarry; Forrest A Spencer
Journal:  Mol Biol Cell       Date:  2004-01-23       Impact factor: 4.138

Review 5.  Eukaryotic MCM proteins: beyond replication initiation.

Authors:  Susan L Forsburg
Journal:  Microbiol Mol Biol Rev       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 11.056

Review 6.  Surviving chromosome replication: the many roles of the S-phase checkpoint pathway.

Authors:  Karim Labib; Giacomo De Piccoli
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2011-12-27       Impact factor: 6.237

7.  Ku prevents Exo1 and Sgs1-dependent resection of DNA ends in the absence of a functional MRX complex or Sae2.

Authors:  Eleni P Mimitou; Lorraine S Symington
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2010-08-20       Impact factor: 11.598

Review 8.  DNA replication stress: from molecular mechanisms to human disease.

Authors:  Sergio Muñoz; Juan Méndez
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  2016-01-21       Impact factor: 4.316

9.  Evidence of meiotic crossover control in Saccharomyces cerevisiae through Mec1-mediated phosphorylation of replication protein A.

Authors:  Amy J Bartrand; Dagmawi Iyasu; Suzanne M Marinco; George S Brush
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2005-08-22       Impact factor: 4.562

10.  Interactions among DNA ligase I, the flap endonuclease and proliferating cell nuclear antigen in the expansion and contraction of CAG repeat tracts in yeast.

Authors:  Eric W Refsland; Dennis M Livingston
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2005-08-03       Impact factor: 4.562

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.