Literature DB >> 10950868

The checkpoint protein Ddc2, functionally related to S. pombe Rad26, interacts with Mec1 and is regulated by Mec1-dependent phosphorylation in budding yeast.

V Paciotti1, M Clerici, G Lucchini, M P Longhese.   

Abstract

DDC2 is a novel component of the DNA integrity checkpoint pathway, which is required for proper checkpoint response to DNA damage and to incomplete DNA replication. Moreover, Ddc2 overproduction causes sensitivity to DNA-damaging agents and checkpoint defects. Ddc2 physically interacts with Mec1 and undergoes Mec1-dependent phosphorylation both in vitro and in vivo. The phosphorylation of Ddc2 takes place in late S phase and in G(2) phase during an unperturbed cell cycle and is further increased in response to DNA damage. Because Ddc2 phosphorylation does not require any other known tested checkpoint factors but Mec1, the Ddc2-Mec1 complex might respond to the presence of some DNA structures independently of the other known checkpoint proteins. Our findings suggest that Ddc2 may be the functional homolog of Schizosaccharomyces pombe Rad26, strengthening the hypothesis that the mechanisms leading to checkpoint activation are conserved throughout evolution.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10950868      PMCID: PMC316858     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genes Dev        ISSN: 0890-9369            Impact factor:   11.361


  52 in total

1.  DNA repair protein Rad55 is a terminal substrate of the DNA damage checkpoints.

Authors:  V I Bashkirov; J S King; E V Bashkirova; J Schmuckli-Maurer; W D Heyer
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 4.272

2.  A Rad3-Rad26 complex responds to DNA damage independently of other checkpoint proteins.

Authors:  R J Edwards; N J Bentley; A M Carr
Journal:  Nat Cell Biol       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 28.824

3.  MEC1-dependent phosphorylation of Rad9p in response to DNA damage.

Authors:  A Emili
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 17.970

4.  New yeast-Escherichia coli shuttle vectors constructed with in vitro mutagenized yeast genes lacking six-base pair restriction sites.

Authors:  R D Gietz; A Sugino
Journal:  Gene       Date:  1988-12-30       Impact factor: 3.688

5.  Checkpoint proteins influence telomeric silencing and length maintenance in budding yeast.

Authors:  M P Longhese; V Paciotti; H Neecke; G Lucchini
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 4.562

6.  The identification of a second cell cycle control on the HO promoter in yeast: cell cycle regulation of SW15 nuclear entry.

Authors:  K Nasmyth; G Adolf; D Lydall; A Seddon
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1990-08-24       Impact factor: 41.582

7.  High spontaneous intrachromosomal recombination rates in ataxia-telangiectasia.

Authors:  M S Meyn
Journal:  Science       Date:  1993-05-28       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  The RAD9 gene controls the cell cycle response to DNA damage in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  T A Weinert; L H Hartwell
Journal:  Science       Date:  1988-07-15       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  Recovery from DNA replicational stress is the essential function of the S-phase checkpoint pathway.

Authors:  B A Desany; A A Alcasabas; J B Bachant; S J Elledge
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  1998-09-15       Impact factor: 11.361

10.  A U3 snoRNP protein with homology to splicing factor PRP4 and G beta domains is required for ribosomal RNA processing.

Authors:  R Jansen; D Tollervey; E C Hurt
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  1993-06       Impact factor: 11.598

View more
  110 in total

1.  Replication protein A is sequentially phosphorylated during meiosis.

Authors:  G S Brush; D M Clifford; S M Marinco; A J Bartrand
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2001-12-01       Impact factor: 16.971

2.  Regulation of ATR substrate selection by Rad17-dependent loading of Rad9 complexes onto chromatin.

Authors:  Lee Zou; David Cortez; Stephen J Elledge
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2002-01-15       Impact factor: 11.361

3.  Suppression of genome instability by redundant S-phase checkpoint pathways in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  Kyungjae Myung; Richard D Kolodner
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-03-26       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Two checkpoint complexes are independently recruited to sites of DNA damage in vivo.

Authors:  J A Melo; J Cohen; D P Toczyski
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2001-11-01       Impact factor: 11.361

5.  Characterization of mec1 kinase-deficient mutants and of new hypomorphic mec1 alleles impairing subsets of the DNA damage response pathway.

Authors:  V Paciotti; M Clerici; M Scotti; G Lucchini; M P Longhese
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 4.272

6.  Silent repair accounts for cell cycle specificity in the signaling of oxidative DNA lesions.

Authors:  C Leroy; C Mann; M C Marsolier
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2001-06-01       Impact factor: 11.598

7.  Protein kinase activity of Tel1p and Mec1p, two Saccharomyces cerevisiae proteins related to the human ATM protein kinase.

Authors:  J C Mallory; T D Petes
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2000-12-05       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  MEC3, MEC1, and DDC2 are essential components of a telomere checkpoint pathway required for cell cycle arrest during senescence in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  Shinichiro Enomoto; Lynn Glowczewski; Judith Berman
Journal:  Mol Biol Cell       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 4.138

9.  Regulation of checkpoint kinases through dynamic interaction with Crb2.

Authors:  Satoru Mochida; Fumiko Esashi; Nobuki Aono; Katsuyuki Tamai; Matthew J O'Connell; Mitsuhiro Yanagida
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2004-01-22       Impact factor: 11.598

10.  Distinct roles for SWR1 and INO80 chromatin remodeling complexes at chromosomal double-strand breaks.

Authors:  Haico van Attikum; Olivier Fritsch; Susan M Gasser
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2007-08-30       Impact factor: 11.598

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.