Literature DB >> 11484058

The DNA replication checkpoint response stabilizes stalled replication forks.

M Lopes1, C Cotta-Ramusino, A Pellicioli, G Liberi, P Plevani, M Muzi-Falconi, C S Newlon, M Foiani.   

Abstract

In response to DNA damage and blocks to replication, eukaryotes activate the checkpoint pathways that prevent genomic instability and cancer by coordinating cell cycle progression with DNA repair. In budding yeast, the checkpoint response requires the Mec1-dependent activation of the Rad53 protein kinase. Active Rad53 slows DNA synthesis when DNA is damaged and prevents firing of late origins of replication. Further, rad53 mutants are unable to recover from a replication block. Mec1 and Rad53 also modulate the phosphorylation state of different DNA replication and repair enzymes. Little is known of the mechanisms by which checkpoint pathways interact with the replication apparatus when DNA is damaged or replication blocked. We used the two-dimensional gel technique to examine replication intermediates in response to hydroxyurea-induced replication blocks. Here we show that hydroxyurea-treated rad53 mutants accumulate unusual DNA structures at replication forks. The persistence of these abnormal molecules during recovery from the hydroxyurea block correlates with the inability to dephosphorylate Rad53. Further, Rad53 is required to properly maintain stable replication forks during the block. We propose that Rad53 prevents collapse of the fork when replication pauses.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11484058     DOI: 10.1038/35087613

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nature        ISSN: 0028-0836            Impact factor:   49.962


  381 in total

1.  Suppression of genome instability by redundant S-phase checkpoint pathways in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  Kyungjae Myung; Richard D Kolodner
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-03-26       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  UV irradiation causes the loss of viable mitotic recombinants in Schizosaccharomyces pombe cells lacking the G(2)/M DNA damage checkpoint.

Authors:  Fekret Osman; Irina R Tsaneva; Matthew C Whitby; Claudette L Doe
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  Essential and dispensable roles of ATR in cell cycle arrest and genome maintenance.

Authors:  Eric J Brown; David Baltimore
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2003-03-01       Impact factor: 11.361

4.  Endonuclease cleavage of blocked replication forks: An indirect pathway of DNA damage from antitumor drug-topoisomerase complexes.

Authors:  George Hong; Kenneth N Kreuzer
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2003-04-18       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 5.  A tough row to hoe: when replication forks encounter DNA damage.

Authors:  Darshil R Patel; Robert S Weiss
Journal:  Biochem Soc Trans       Date:  2018-12-04       Impact factor: 5.407

6.  Combination of bifunctional alkylating agent and arsenic trioxide synergistically suppresses the growth of drug-resistant tumor cells.

Authors:  Pei-Chih Lee; Rajesh Kakadiya; Tsann-Long Su; Te-Chang Lee
Journal:  Neoplasia       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 5.715

7.  Cyclin regulation by the s phase checkpoint.

Authors:  Gloria Palou; Roger Palou; Angel Guerra-Moreno; Alba Duch; Anna Travesa; David G Quintana
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2010-06-10       Impact factor: 5.157

8.  Keeping it together in times of stress: checkpoint function at stalled replication forks.

Authors:  Theresa J Berens; David P Toczyski
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2012-03-09       Impact factor: 17.970

9.  Stabilization of stalled DNA replication forks by the BRCA2 breast cancer susceptibility protein.

Authors:  Mikhail Lomonosov; Shubha Anand; Mahesh Sangrithi; Rachel Davies; Ashok R Venkitaraman
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2003-12-17       Impact factor: 11.361

10.  A coordinated temporal interplay of nucleosome reorganization factor, sister chromatin cohesion factor, and DNA polymerase alpha facilitates DNA replication.

Authors:  Yanjiao Zhou; Teresa S-F Wang
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 4.272

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.