Literature DB >> 19878693

Neural electrode degradation from continuous electrical stimulation: comparison of sputtered and activated iridium oxide.

Sandeep Negi1, Rajmohan Bhandari, Loren Rieth, Rick Van Wagenen, Florian Solzbacher.   

Abstract

The performance of neural electrodes in physiological fluid, especially in chronic use, is critical for the success of functional electrical stimulation devices. Tips of the Utah electrode arrays (UEAs) were coated with sputtered iridium oxide film (SIROF) and activated iridium oxide film (AIROF) to study the degradation during charge injection consistent with functional electrical stimulation (FES). The arrays were subjected to continuous biphasic, cathodal first, charge balanced (with equal cathodal and anodal pulse widths) current pulses for 7h (>1 million pulses) at a frequency of 50 Hz. The amplitude and width of the current pulses were varied to determine the damage threshold of the coatings. Degradation was characterized by scanning electron microscopy, inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry, electrochemical impedance spectroscopy and cyclic voltammetry. The injected charge and charge density per phase were found to play synergistic role in damaging the electrodes. The damage threshold for SIROF coated electrode tips of the UEA was between 60 nC with a charge density of 1.9 mC/cm(2) per phase and 80 nC with a charge density of 1.0 mC/cm(2) per phase. While for AIROF coated electrode tips, the threshold was between 40 nC with a charge density of 0.9 mC/cm(2) per phase and 50 nC with a charge density of 0.5 mC/cm(2) per phase. Compared to AIROF, SIROF showed higher damage threshold and therefore is highly recommended to be used as a stimulation material. (c) 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19878693      PMCID: PMC2814928          DOI: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2009.10.016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci Methods        ISSN: 0165-0270            Impact factor:   2.390


  22 in total

1.  Electrical stimulation of the brain. III. The neural damage model.

Authors:  R H Pudenz; L A Bullara; S Jacques; F T Hambrecht
Journal:  Surg Neurol       Date:  1975-10

2.  Imbalanced biphasic electrical stimulation: muscle tissue damage.

Authors:  A Scheiner; J T Mortimer; U Roessmann
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 3.934

3.  Charge density and charge per phase as cofactors in neural injury induced by electrical stimulation.

Authors:  D B McCreery; W F Agnew; T G Yuen; L Bullara
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  1990-10       Impact factor: 4.538

4.  Microelectrode array for chronic deep-brain microstimulation and recording.

Authors:  Douglas McCreery; Albert Lossinsky; Victor Pikov; Xindong Liu
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 4.538

Review 5.  Technology insight: future neuroprosthetic therapies for disorders of the nervous system.

Authors:  Richard A Normann
Journal:  Nat Clin Pract Neurol       Date:  2007-08

6.  Sputtered iridium oxide films (SIROFs) for low-impedance neural stimulation and recording electrodes.

Authors:  S F Cogan; T D Plante; J Ehrlich
Journal:  Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc       Date:  2004

Review 7.  Neural stimulation and recording electrodes.

Authors:  Stuart F Cogan
Journal:  Annu Rev Biomed Eng       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 9.590

8.  Experimental nondestructive electrical stimulation of the brain and spinal cord.

Authors:  J T Mortimer; C N Shealy; C Wheeler
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  1970-05       Impact factor: 5.115

9.  A silicon-based, three-dimensional neural interface: manufacturing processes for an intracortical electrode array.

Authors:  P K Campbell; K E Jones; R J Huber; K W Horch; R A Normann
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  1991-08       Impact factor: 4.538

10.  Histopathologic evaluation of prolonged intracortical electrical stimulation.

Authors:  W F Agnew; T G Yuen; D B McCreery; L A Bullara
Journal:  Exp Neurol       Date:  1986-04       Impact factor: 5.330

View more
  26 in total

1.  Behavioral assessment of sensitivity to intracortical microstimulation of primate somatosensory cortex.

Authors:  Sungshin Kim; Thierri Callier; Gregg A Tabot; Robert A Gaunt; Francesco V Tenore; Sliman J Bensmaia
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-10-26       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  In Vitro/Ex Vivo Investigation of Modified Utah Electrode Array to Selectively Sense and Pace the Sub-Surface Cardiac His Bundle.

Authors:  Ankur R Shah; Muhammad S Khan; Annie M Hirahara; Matthias Lange; Ravi Ranjan; Derek J Dosdall
Journal:  ACS Biomater Sci Eng       Date:  2020-05-07

3.  The effect of chronic intracortical microstimulation on the electrode-tissue interface.

Authors:  Kevin H Chen; John F Dammann; Jessica L Boback; Francesco V Tenore; Kevin J Otto; Robert A Gaunt; Sliman J Bensmaia
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2014-02-06       Impact factor: 5.379

Review 4.  A review of organic and inorganic biomaterials for neural interfaces.

Authors:  Pouria Fattahi; Guang Yang; Gloria Kim; Mohammad Reza Abidian
Journal:  Adv Mater       Date:  2014-03-26       Impact factor: 30.849

5.  A computational model that predicts behavioral sensitivity to intracortical microstimulation.

Authors:  Sungshin Kim; Thierri Callier; Sliman J Bensmaia
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2016-12-15       Impact factor: 5.379

6.  SELF ALIGNED TIP DEINSULATION OF ATOMIC LAYER DEPOSITED AL2O3 AND PARYLENE C COATED UTAH ELECTRODE ARRAY BASED NEURAL INTERFACES.

Authors:  Xianzong Xie; Loren Rieth; Sandeep Negi; Rajmohan Bhandari; Ryan Caldwell; Rohit Sharma; Prashant Tathireddy; Florian Solzbacher
Journal:  J Micromech Microeng       Date:  2014-03-01       Impact factor: 1.881

7.  The development of neural stimulators: a review of preclinical safety and efficacy studies.

Authors:  Robert K Shepherd; Joel Villalobos; Owen Burns; David A X Nayagam
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2018-05-14       Impact factor: 5.379

8.  Engineered Axonal Tracts as "Living Electrodes" for Synaptic-Based Modulation of Neural Circuitry.

Authors:  Mijail D Serruya; James P Harris; Dayo O Adewole; Laura A Struzyna; Justin C Burrell; Ashley Nemes; Dmitriy Petrov; Reuben H Kraft; H Isaac Chen; John A Wolf; D Kacy Cullen
Journal:  Adv Funct Mater       Date:  2017-09-04       Impact factor: 18.808

9.  Excimer laser deinsulation of Parylene-C on iridium for use in an activated iridium oxide film-coated Utah electrode array.

Authors:  Je-Min Yoo; Sandeep Negi; Prashant Tathireddy; Florian Solzbacher; Jong-In Song; Loren W Rieth
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2013-02-28       Impact factor: 2.390

10.  Multi-electrode stimulation in somatosensory cortex increases probability of detection.

Authors:  Boubker Zaaimi; Ricardo Ruiz-Torres; Sara A Solla; Lee E Miller
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2013-08-28       Impact factor: 5.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.