Literature DB >> 2221508

Imbalanced biphasic electrical stimulation: muscle tissue damage.

A Scheiner1, J T Mortimer, U Roessmann.   

Abstract

The effects of imbalanced biphasic stimulation were studied on cat skeletal muscle to determine if greater charge densities can be safely used than with balanced or monophasic stimulation. The results of the study indicate that imbalanced biphasic stimulation can be tolerated safely by tissue at or below a net dc current density of 35 microA/mm2 and not safely tolerated at or above a net dc current of 50 microA/mm2. Monophasic stimulation has been shown to be safe at or below net dc current levels of 10 microA/mm2 and in these studies we found it was not safe at or above net dc current levels of 20 microA/mm2. Stimuli were applied to muscles via coiled wire intramuscular electrodes using a regulated current source. Since the safe average current density was higher for imbalanced biphasic stimulation than for monophasic stimulation, this suggests that: (a) pH change is not the primary reaction causing tissue damage and (b) the damaging electrochemical process that takes place during a cathodic stimulation pulse can be reversed by an anodic pulse having substantially less charge than its companion cathodic pulse. We conclude that greater cathodic charge densities can be safely employed with imbalanced biphasic stimulation than with either monophasic stimulation or balanced charge biphasic stimulation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2221508     DOI: 10.1007/bf02364157

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng        ISSN: 0090-6964            Impact factor:   3.934


  7 in total

1.  A percutaneous wire electrode for chronic research use.

Authors:  C W Caldwell; J B Reswick
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  1975-09       Impact factor: 4.538

2.  An approach to corrosion control during electrical stimulation.

Authors:  J McHardy; D Geller; S B Brummer
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  1977-06       Impact factor: 3.934

3.  Calculations of temperature rise produced in body tissue by a spherical electrode.

Authors:  R T Ruggeri; T R Beck
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 3.934

4.  Ultrastructural injury to chick myocardial cells in vitro following "electric countershock".

Authors:  J L Jones; C C Proskauer; W K Paull; E Lepeschkin; R E Jones
Journal:  Circ Res       Date:  1980-03       Impact factor: 17.367

5.  Intramuscular electrical stimulation: tissue damage.

Authors:  J T Mortimer; D Kaufman; U Roessman
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  1980       Impact factor: 3.934

6.  Criteria for selecting electrodes for electrical stimulation: theoretical and practical considerations.

Authors:  S B Brummer; L S Robblee; F T Hambrecht
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  1983       Impact factor: 5.691

7.  Decreased defibrillator-induced dysfunction with biphasic rectangular waveforms.

Authors:  J L Jones; R E Jones
Journal:  Am J Physiol       Date:  1984-11
  7 in total
  14 in total

1.  Conduction block of whole nerve without onset firing using combined high frequency and direct current.

Authors:  D Michael Ackermann; Niloy Bhadra; Emily L Foldes; Kevin L Kilgore
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2010-10-02       Impact factor: 2.602

2.  Histomorphological evidence of muscle tissue damage and recording area using coiled and straight intramuscular wire electrodes.

Authors:  Hiroyuki Tamaki; Fusayoshi Murata; Hiroaki Takekura
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2006-08-09       Impact factor: 3.078

3.  Electrical stimulation increases hypertrophy and metabolic flux in tissue-engineered human skeletal muscle.

Authors:  Alastair Khodabukus; Lauran Madden; Neel K Prabhu; Timothy R Koves; Christopher P Jackman; Deborah M Muoio; Nenad Bursac
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2018-08-31       Impact factor: 12.479

4.  A New System and Paradigm for Chronic Stimulation of Denervated Rat Muscle.

Authors:  Michael P Willand; Juan Pablo Lopez; Hubert de Bruin; Margaret Fahnestock; Michael Holmes; James R Bain
Journal:  J Med Biol Eng       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 1.553

5.  Chronic neuromuscular electrical stimulation of paralyzed hindlimbs in a rodent model.

Authors:  Ranu Jung; Kazuhiko Ichihara; Ganapriya Venkatasubramanian; James J Abbas
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2009-07-09       Impact factor: 2.390

6.  Evaluation of Activated Carbon and Platinum Black as High-Capacitance Materials for Platinum Electrodes.

Authors:  Andrew Goh; David Roberts; Jesse Wainright; Narendra Bhadra; Kevin Kilgore; Niloy Bhadra; Tina Vrabec
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-03       Impact factor: 3.847

7.  A fully implantable wireless bidirectional neuromodulation system for mice.

Authors:  Jason P Wright; Ibrahim T Mughrabi; Jason Wong; Jose Mathew; Naveen Jayaprakash; Christine Crosfield; Eric H Chang; Sangeeta S Chavan; Kevin J Tracey; Valentin A Pavlov; Yousef Al-Abed; Theodoros P Zanos; Stavros Zanos; Timir Datta-Chaudhuri
Journal:  Biosens Bioelectron       Date:  2021-12-11       Impact factor: 12.545

8.  Electrical neurostimulation with imbalanced waveform mitigates dissolution of platinum electrodes.

Authors:  Doe Kumsa; Eric M Hudak; Fred W Montague; Shawn C Kelley; Darrel F Untereker; Benjamin P Hahn; Chris Condit; Martin Cholette; Hyowon Lee; Dawn Bardot; Pavel Takmakov
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2016-09-21       Impact factor: 5.379

9.  Neural electrode degradation from continuous electrical stimulation: comparison of sputtered and activated iridium oxide.

Authors:  Sandeep Negi; Rajmohan Bhandari; Loren Rieth; Rick Van Wagenen; Florian Solzbacher
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2009-10-28       Impact factor: 2.390

10.  Modified pulse shapes for effective neural stimulation.

Authors:  Lorenz Hofmann; Martin Ebert; Peter Alexander Tass; Christian Hauptmann
Journal:  Front Neuroeng       Date:  2011-09-28
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.