Literature DB >> 19852662

Torque expression in stainless steel orthodontic brackets. A systematic review.

Amy Archambault1, Ryan Lacoursiere, Hisham Badawi, Paul W Major, Jason Carey, Carlos Flores-Mir.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the quantitative effects on torque expression of varying the slot size of stainless steel orthodontic brackets and the dimension of stainless steel wire, and to analyze the limitations of the experimental methods used.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: In vitro studies measuring torque expression in conventional and self-ligating stainless steel brackets with a torque-measuring device, with the use of straight stainless steel orthodontic wire without second-order mechanics and without loops, coils, or auxiliary wires, were sought through a systematic review process.
RESULTS: Eleven articles were selected. Direct comparison of different studies was limited by differences in the measuring devices used and in the parameters measured. On the basis of the selected studies, in a 0.018 inch stainless steel bracket slot, the engagement angle ranges from 31 degrees with a 0.016 x 0.016 inch stainless steel archwire to 4.6 degrees with a 0.018 x 0.025 inch stainless steel archwire. In a 0.022 inch stainless steel bracket slot, the engagement angle ranges from 18 degrees with a 0.018 x 0.025 inch stainless steel archwire to 6 degrees with a 0.021 x 0.025 inch stainless steel archwire. Active stainless steel self-ligating brackets demonstrate an engagement angle of approximately 7.5 degrees, whereas passive stainless steel self-ligating brackets show an engagement angle of approximately 14 degrees with 0.019 x 0.025 inch stainless steel wire in a 0.022 inch slot.
CONCLUSIONS: The engagement angle depends on archwire dimension and edge shape, as well as on bracket slot dimension, and is variable and larger than published theoretical values. Clinically effective torque can be achieved in a 0.022 inch bracket slot with archwire torsion of 15 to 31 degrees for active self-ligating brackets and of 23 to 35 degrees for passive self-ligating brackets with a 0.019 x 0.025 inch stainless steel wire.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 19852662      PMCID: PMC8978750          DOI: 10.2319/080508-352.1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Angle Orthod        ISSN: 0003-3219            Impact factor:   2.079


  18 in total

1.  Torque transmission between square wire and bracket as a function of measurement, form and hardness parameters.

Authors:  H Fischer-Brandies; W Orthuber; M Es-Souni; S Meyer
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 1.938

2.  Torque capacity of metal and plastic brackets with reference to materials, application, technology and biomechanics.

Authors:  Henner Gmyrek; Christoph Bourauel; Gert Richter; Winfried Harzer
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 1.938

3.  An experimental apparatus for the simulation of three-dimensional movements in orthodontics.

Authors:  C Bourauel; D Drescher; M Thier
Journal:  J Biomed Eng       Date:  1992-09

4.  [Influence of loops on the torsion stiffness of rectangular wire].

Authors:  Jian Zhang; Ding Bai; Ming Gu; Na Kang
Journal:  Sichuan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban       Date:  2004-05

5.  Torque capacity of metal and polycarbonate brackets with and without a metal slot.

Authors:  Winfried Harzer; Christoph Bourauel; Henner Gmyrek
Journal:  Eur J Orthod       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 3.075

6.  [Incisor torque control with fixed appliance].

Authors:  Ding Bai; Min Gu; Jian Zhang
Journal:  Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi       Date:  2004-03

7.  Maxillary incisor torque with conventional and self-ligating brackets: a prospective clinical trial.

Authors:  N Pandis; S Strigou; T Eliades
Journal:  Orthod Craniofac Res       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 1.826

8.  An evaluation of the torsional moments developed in orthodontic applications. An in vitro study.

Authors:  J Odegaard; T Meling; E Meling
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  1994-04       Impact factor: 2.650

9.  Variability of effective root torque as a function of edge bevel on orthodontic arch wires.

Authors:  J Sebanc; W A Brantley; J J Pincsak; J P Conover
Journal:  Am J Orthod       Date:  1984-07

10.  Torque expression of self-ligating brackets compared with conventional metallic, ceramic, and plastic brackets.

Authors:  Enver Morina; Theodore Eliades; Nikolaos Pandis; Andreas Jäger; Christoph Bourauel
Journal:  Eur J Orthod       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 3.075

View more
  28 in total

1.  Midline correction by asymmetric reciprocal torque: a pilot study.

Authors:  Kanji Onodera; Aleš Celar
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2012-07-11       Impact factor: 1.938

2.  Root resorption due to orthodontic treatment using self-ligating and conventional brackets : A cone-beam computed tomography study.

Authors:  Isil Aras; Idil Unal; Gencer Huniler; Aynur Aras
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2018-04-12       Impact factor: 1.938

3.  Novel methods reveal that parallelism contributes to the functional vertical slot dimension in ceramic and metal brackets.

Authors:  Matthew Silver; Alfred C Griffin; Lauren Azzopardi; Mohammed I Masoud; Oluwabunmi Tokede; Alfred C Griffin
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2018-08-20       Impact factor: 2.079

4.  Comparison of achieved and predicted tooth movement of maxillary first molars and central incisors: First premolar extraction treatment with Invisalign.

Authors:  Fan-Fan Dai; Tian-Min Xu; Guang Shu
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2019-03-28       Impact factor: 2.079

5.  Accuracy evaluation of bracket repositioning by indirect bonding: hard acrylic CAD/CAM versus soft one-layer silicone trays, an in vitro study.

Authors:  Thomas Pottier; Antoine Brient; Yann Loïg Turpin; Brice Chauvel; Vincent Meuric; Olivier Sorel; Damien Brezulier
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2020-03-31       Impact factor: 3.573

6.  Bidimensional techniques for stronger anterior torque control in extraction cases: a combined clinical and typodont study.

Authors:  Yu Li; Na Tang; Zhenrui Xu; Xiaoxia Feng; Liang Yang; Zhihe Zhao
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2011-12-08       Impact factor: 2.079

7.  Buccolingual Inclination Effects of Self-Ligating and Conventional Premolar Brackets: A Cone Beam Computed Tomography Study.

Authors:  Sabahat Yazıcıoğlu; A Alper Öz; A Zeynep Öz; Nursel Arıcı; Mete Özer; Selim Arıcı
Journal:  Turk J Orthod       Date:  2020-05-22

8.  Three-dimensional quantification of pretorqued nickel-titanium wires in edgewise and prescription brackets.

Authors:  Nitika Mittal; Zeyang Xia; Jie Chen; Kelton T Stewart; Sean Shih-Yao Liu
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2012-10-24       Impact factor: 2.079

9.  Effectiveness of computer-assisted orthodontic treatment technology to achieve predicted outcomes.

Authors:  Brent E Larson; Christopher J Vaubel; Thorsten Grünheid
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2012-11-26       Impact factor: 2.079

10.  Torque efficiency of different archwires in 0.018- and 0.022-inch conventional brackets.

Authors:  Iosif Sifakakis; Nikolaos Pandis; Margarita Makou; Theodore Eliades; Christos Katsaros; Christoph Bourauel
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2013-05-16       Impact factor: 2.079

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.