Literature DB >> 32637192

Buccolingual Inclination Effects of Self-Ligating and Conventional Premolar Brackets: A Cone Beam Computed Tomography Study.

Sabahat Yazıcıoğlu1, A Alper Öz1, A Zeynep Öz1, Nursel Arıcı1, Mete Özer1, Selim Arıcı1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to compare the effects of passive self-ligating (PSL) and conventional ligating (CL) of brackets on the buccolingual inclination (BLINC) of the maxillary premolars.
METHODS: This in vitro study included a PSL bracket group and a CL bracket group. Acrylic teeth on typodonts were aligned using 0.014-inch heat-activated nickel titanium (HANT) (T1) and 0.019×0.025-inch HANT (T2) and 0.021×0.025-inch stainless steel (SS) (T3) archwires in a sequence. Standardized cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) images were taken immediately after each archwire stage. The differences of premolar teeth BLINC values in the 0.019×0.025-inch and 0.014-inch HANT archwires (T2-T1) and 0.021×0.025-inch SS and 0.019×0.025-inch HANT archwires (T3-T2) were compared between PSL and CL groups. The value of p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
RESULTS: The BLINC change of the second premolar (SPM) showed a statistically significant difference (p=0.008), but the BLINC change of the first premolar (FPM) (p=0.056) between the groups showed no statistically significant difference during the T2-T1 stage. However, there were statistically significant differences between two groups in the BLINC of the FPM (p=0.032) and SPM (p=0.032) in the T3-T2 stage. The angular changes in the buccal direction in the PSL group were higher than those in the CL group.
CONCLUSION: The PSL upper premolar brackets used with the 0.021×0.025-inch SS archwire produced more buccal crown movement of the upper PM teeth compared with that of the CL brackets. © Copyright 2020 by Turkish Orthodontic Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cone beam computed tomography (CBCT); orthodontic brackets; premolar inclination

Year:  2020        PMID: 32637192      PMCID: PMC7316473          DOI: 10.5152/TurkJOrthod.2020.19079

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Turk J Orthod        ISSN: 2148-9505


  22 in total

1.  An evaluation of slot size in orthodontic brackets--are standards as expected?

Authors:  A C Cash; S A Good; R V Curtis; F McDonald
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 2.079

2.  Torque capacity of metal and polycarbonate brackets with and without a metal slot.

Authors:  Winfried Harzer; Christoph Bourauel; Henner Gmyrek
Journal:  Eur J Orthod       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  Bracket slot and archwire dimensions: manufacturing precision and third order clearance.

Authors:  Astrid Joch; Margit Pichelmayer; Frank Weiland
Journal:  J Orthod       Date:  2010-12

4.  Maxillary incisor torque with conventional and self-ligating brackets: a prospective clinical trial.

Authors:  N Pandis; S Strigou; T Eliades
Journal:  Orthod Craniofac Res       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 1.826

5.  Torque control of the maxillary incisors in lingual and labial orthodontics: a 3-dimensional finite element analysis.

Authors:  Wei Liang; Qiguo Rong; Jiuxiang Lin; Baohua Xu
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 2.650

6.  A new method to measure mesiodistal angulation and faciolingual inclination of each whole tooth with volumetric cone-beam computed tomography images.

Authors:  Hongsheng Tong; Reyes Enciso; Dana Van Elslande; Paul W Major; Glenn T Sameshima
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 2.650

7.  Numeric modeling of torque capabilities of self-ligating and conventional brackets.

Authors:  Yue Huang; Ludger Keilig; Alireza Rahimi; Susanne Reimann; Theodore Eliades; Andreas Jäger; Christoph Bourauel
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 2.650

8.  Torque expression of 0.018 and 0.022 inch conventional brackets.

Authors:  Iosif Sifakakis; Nikolaos Pandis; Margarita Makou; Theodore Eliades; Christos Katsaros; Christoph Bourauel
Journal:  Eur J Orthod       Date:  2012-07-24       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 9.  Torque expression in stainless steel orthodontic brackets. A systematic review.

Authors:  Amy Archambault; Ryan Lacoursiere; Hisham Badawi; Paul W Major; Jason Carey; Carlos Flores-Mir
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 2.079

Review 10.  Torque expression in self-ligating orthodontic brackets and conventionally ligated brackets: A systematic review.

Authors:  Yousef Al-Thomali; Roshan-Noor Mohamed; Sakeenabi Basha
Journal:  J Clin Exp Dent       Date:  2017-01-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.