Literature DB >> 18540011

Torque expression of self-ligating brackets compared with conventional metallic, ceramic, and plastic brackets.

Enver Morina1, Theodore Eliades, Nikolaos Pandis, Andreas Jäger, Christoph Bourauel.   

Abstract

The purpose of this research was to investigate the torque capacity of active and passive self-ligating brackets compared with metallic, ceramic, and polycarbonate edgewise brackets. Six types of orthodontic brackets were included in the study: the self-ligating Speed and Damon2, the stainless steel (SS), Ultratrimm and Discovery, the ceramic bracket, Fascination 2, and the polycarbonate bracket, Brillant. All brackets had a 0.022-inch slot size and were torqued with 0.019 x 0.025-inch SS archwires. For this purpose, the labial crown torque of an upper central incisor was measured in a simulated intraoral clinical situation using the orthodontic measurement and simulation system (OMSS). A torque of 20 degrees was applied and the correction of the misalignement was simulated experimentally with the OMSS. Each bracket/wire combination was measured five times. Maximum torquing moments and torque loss were determined. The results were analysed with one-way analysis of variance, with the bracket serving as the sole discriminating variable, and the Tukey test at the 0.05 level of significance. The ceramic bracket (Fascination 2) presented the highest torquing moment (35 Nmm) and, together with a SS bracket, the lowest torque loss (4.6 degrees). Self-ligating, polycarbonate, and selective metallic brackets demonstrated almost a 7-fold decreased moment developed during insertion of a 0.019 x 0.022-inch SS wire into a 0.022-inch slot and a 100 per cent increase in loss.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18540011     DOI: 10.1093/ejo/cjn005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Orthod        ISSN: 0141-5387            Impact factor:   3.075


  31 in total

1.  Experimental analysis of torque characteristics of orthodontic wires.

Authors:  Samira Partowi; Ludger Keilig; Susanne Reimann; Andreas Jäger; Christoph Bourauel
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2010-10-21       Impact factor: 1.938

2.  Midline correction by asymmetric reciprocal torque: a pilot study.

Authors:  Kanji Onodera; Aleš Celar
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2012-07-11       Impact factor: 1.938

3.  Torque efficiency of a customized lingual appliance : Performance of wires with three different ligature systems.

Authors:  Marco Migliorati; Daniela Poggio; Sara Drago; Alberto Lagazzo; Roberto Stradi; Fabrizio Barberis; Armando Silvestrini-Biavati
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2019-09-24       Impact factor: 1.938

4.  Coordinating bracket torque and incisor inclination : Part 3: Validity of bracket torque values in achieving norm inclinations.

Authors:  Bernd Zimmer; Hiba Sino
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2018-03-19       Impact factor: 1.938

5.  Measurement of orthodontic bracket tie wing elastic and plastic deformation by arch wire torque expression utilizing an optical image correlation technique.

Authors:  Ryan A Lacoursiere; David S Nobes; Darren L N Homeniuk; Jason P Carey; Hisham H Badawi; Paul W Major
Journal:  J Dent Biomech       Date:  2009-12-13

Review 6.  Torque expression in stainless steel orthodontic brackets. A systematic review.

Authors:  Amy Archambault; Ryan Lacoursiere; Hisham Badawi; Paul W Major; Jason Carey; Carlos Flores-Mir
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 2.079

7.  A comparison of torque expression between stainless steel, titanium molybdenum alloy, and copper nickel titanium wires in metallic self-ligating brackets.

Authors:  Amy Archambault; Thomas W Major; Jason P Carey; Giseon Heo; Hisham Badawi; Paul W Major
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 2.079

8.  Treatment and posttreatment effects induced by the Forsus appliance: A controlled clinical study.

Authors:  Giorgio Cacciatore; Luis Tomas Huanca Ghislanzoni; Lisa Alvetro; Veronica Giuntini; Lorenzo Franchi
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2014-03-25       Impact factor: 2.079

9.  Comparative analysis of slot dimension in lingual bracket systems.

Authors:  Anton Demling; Marc P Dittmer; Rainer Schwestka-Polly
Journal:  Head Face Med       Date:  2009-12-15       Impact factor: 2.151

10.  Treatment time, outcome, and anchorage loss comparisons of self-ligating and conventional brackets.

Authors:  Ferdinand M Machibya; Xingfu Bao; Lihua Zhao; Min Hu
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2012-08-17       Impact factor: 2.079

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.