Literature DB >> 23678999

Torque efficiency of different archwires in 0.018- and 0.022-inch conventional brackets.

Iosif Sifakakis1, Nikolaos Pandis, Margarita Makou, Theodore Eliades, Christos Katsaros, Christoph Bourauel.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare the archwires inserted during the final stages of the orthodontic treatment with the generated moments at 0.018- and 0.022-inch brackets.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The same bracket type, in terms of prescription, was evaluated in both slot dimensions. The brackets were bonded on two identical maxillary acrylic resin models, and each model was mounted on the orthodontic measurement and simulation system. Ten 0.017 × 0.025-inch TMA and ten 0.017 × 0.025-inch stainless steel archwires were evaluated in the 0.018-inch brackets. In the 0.022-inch brackets, ten 0.019 × 0.025-inch TMA and ten 0.019 × 0.025-inch stainless steel archwires were measured. A 15° buccal root torque (+15°) and then a 15° palatal root torque (-15°) were gradually applied to the right central incisor bracket, and the moments were recorded at these positions. A t-test was conducted to compare the generated moments between wires within the 0.018- and 0.022-inch bracket groups separately.
RESULTS: The 0.017 × 0.025-inch archwire in the 0.018-inch brackets generated mean moments of 9.25 Nmm and 14.2 Nmm for the TMA and stainless steel archwires, respectively. The measured moments in the 0.022-inch brackets with the 0.019 × 0.025-inch TMA and stainless steel archwires were 6.6 Nmm and 9.3 Nmm, respectively.
CONCLUSION: The 0.017 × 0.025-inch stainless steel and β-Ti archwires in the 0.018-inch slot generated higher moments than the 0.019 × 0.025-inch archwires because of lower torque play. This difference is exaggerated in steel archwires, in comparison with the β-Ti, because of differences in stiffness. The differences of maximum moments between the archwires of the same cross-section but different alloys were statistically significant at both slot dimensions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23678999      PMCID: PMC8683062          DOI: 10.2319/021713-138.1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Angle Orthod        ISSN: 0003-3219            Impact factor:   2.079


  35 in total

1.  Torque capacity of metal and polycarbonate brackets with and without a metal slot.

Authors:  Winfried Harzer; Christoph Bourauel; Henner Gmyrek
Journal:  Eur J Orthod       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  Materials-induced variation in the torque expression of preadjusted appliances.

Authors:  Christiana Gioka; Theodore Eliades
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 2.650

3.  Mechanical effects of third-order movement in self-ligated brackets by the measurement of torque expression.

Authors:  Thomas W Major; Jason P Carey; David S Nobes; Giseon Heo; Paul W Major
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 2.650

4.  Application of the orthodontic measurement and simulation system (OMSS) in orthodontics.

Authors:  D Drescher; C Bourauel; M Thier
Journal:  Eur J Orthod       Date:  1991-06       Impact factor: 3.075

5.  Numeric modeling of torque capabilities of self-ligating and conventional brackets.

Authors:  Yue Huang; Ludger Keilig; Alireza Rahimi; Susanne Reimann; Theodore Eliades; Andreas Jäger; Christoph Bourauel
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 2.650

6.  Computer experiments using a two-dimensional model of tooth support.

Authors:  D J Halazonetis
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 2.650

7.  Torque capabilities of self-ligating and conventional brackets under the effect of bracket width and free wire length.

Authors:  Y Huang; L Keilig; A Rahimi; S Reimann; C Bourauel
Journal:  Orthod Craniofac Res       Date:  2012-08-27       Impact factor: 1.826

8.  Measurements of the torque moment in various archwire-bracket-ligation combinations.

Authors:  Miyuki Hirai; Akira Nakajima; Nobuhiko Kawai; Eiji Tanaka; Yu Igarashi; Masahito Sakaguchi; Glenn T Sameshima; Noriyoshi Shimizu
Journal:  Eur J Orthod       Date:  2011-05-13       Impact factor: 3.075

9.  Variable-modulus orthodontics.

Authors:  C J Burstone
Journal:  Am J Orthod       Date:  1981-07

10.  Correlation between cortical plate proximity and apical root resorption.

Authors:  A Horiuchi; H Hotokezaka; K Kobayashi
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 2.650

View more
  4 in total

1.  Coordinating bracket torque and incisor inclination : Part 3: Validity of bracket torque values in achieving norm inclinations.

Authors:  Bernd Zimmer; Hiba Sino
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2018-03-19       Impact factor: 1.938

2.  Change in crown inclination accompanying initial tooth alignment with round archwires.

Authors:  Mona A Montasser; Ludger Keilig; Christoph Bourauel
Journal:  Dental Press J Orthod       Date:  2022-07-04

3.  Torque efficiency of square and rectangular archwires into 0.018 and 0.022 in. conventional brackets.

Authors:  Spyridon N Papageorgiou; Iosif Sifakakis; Ioannis Doulis; Theodore Eliades; Christoph Bourauel
Journal:  Prog Orthod       Date:  2016-01-15       Impact factor: 2.750

4.  Implications of pretreatment incisor inclinations for the achievement of cephalometric normal values-a study on two patient collectives.

Authors:  B Zimmer; H Sino; S Schenk-Kazan
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2021-07-07       Impact factor: 1.938

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.