Literature DB >> 19774749

Family stories and the use of heuristics: women from suspected hereditary breast and ovarian cancer (HBOC) families.

Regina Kenen1, Audrey Ardern-Jones, Rosalind Eeles.   

Abstract

The practice of medicine will increasingly be medicine of the family rather than the traditional physician/patient dyad, especially where a genetic condition is involved. This study explores how clients from suspected hereditary breast and ovarian cancer (HBOC) families seeking cancer genetics risk counselling are influenced by family stories and the use of heuristics (inferential shortcuts used to make sense of complicated information) in interpreting and applying genetic information they receive, and suggests ways in which genetic counsellors can integrate family context into their traditional counselling practices. We conducted an exploratory, qualitative study at a major clinical and research cancer centre in the United Kingdom from January to June 2000 which was reviewed by the hospital clinical research and ethics committees. Twenty-one semi-structured, in-depth interviews were conducted using a purposive sample of women coming to the cancer genetics clinic for the first time, supplemented by five months of clinical observation at weekly clinics. In addition to many family stories based on the number and outcomes of the cancers in their families, we noted: (1) fragments of stories, (2) secret stories, (3) emerging explanations and (4) misconceptions, We did not find widespread intergenerational family myths, The women used three main heuristics in interpreting their breast/ ovarian cancer risk: (1) representativeness, (2) availability and (3) illusion of control, as well as what Kahneman refers to as the Peak and End rule. Recent psychological research indicates that illusions of control may have positive affects on both physical and mental health. This may pose a future ethical issue for genetic counsellors in determining how to balance the benefit of positive illusions with the delivery of statistical probabilities of risk.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 19774749     DOI: 10.1046/j.1467-9566.2003.00372.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sociol Health Illn        ISSN: 0141-9889


  26 in total

Review 1.  Communicating genetic risk information within families: a review.

Authors:  Mel Wiseman; Caroline Dancyger; Susan Michie
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 2.375

2.  Are family-oriented interventions in Portuguese genetics services a remote possibility? Professionals' views on a multifamily intervention for cancer susceptibility families.

Authors:  Alvaro Mendes; Milena Paneque; Liliana Sousa
Journal:  J Community Genet       Date:  2012-02-08

Review 3.  How risk is perceived, constructed and interpreted by clients in clinical genetics, and the effects on decision making: systematic review.

Authors:  Stephanie Sivell; Glyn Elwyn; Clara L Gaff; Angus J Clarke; Rachel Iredale; Chris Shaw; Joanna Dundon; Hazel Thornton; Adrian Edwards
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2007-10-30       Impact factor: 2.537

Review 4.  Information processing in the context of genetic risk: implications for genetic-risk communication.

Authors:  Holly Etchegary; Colin Perrier
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2007-05-01       Impact factor: 2.537

5.  Researching Experiences of Cancer Risk Through Online Blogs: A Reflexive Account of Working Toward Ethical Practice.

Authors:  Emily Ross
Journal:  J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics       Date:  2019-08-17       Impact factor: 1.742

6.  "Awakening to" a new meaning of being at-risk for arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy: a grounded theory study.

Authors:  April Manuel; Fern Brunger
Journal:  J Community Genet       Date:  2015-01-27

7.  Families' experience of oncogenetic counselling: accounts from a heterogeneous hereditary cancer risk population.

Authors:  Álvaro Mendes; Liliana Sousa
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 2.375

8.  Genetic Testing and Post-Testing Decision Making among BRCA-Positive Mutation Women: A Psychosocial Approach.

Authors:  Sharlene Hesse-Biber; Chen An
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2016-01-13       Impact factor: 2.537

9.  Making sense of genetic uncertainty: the role of religion and spirituality.

Authors:  Mary T White
Journal:  Am J Med Genet C Semin Med Genet       Date:  2009-02-15       Impact factor: 3.908

10.  Exome sequencing disclosures in pediatric cancer care: Patterns of communication among oncologists, genetic counselors, and parents.

Authors:  Sarah Scollon; Mary A Majumder; Katie Bergstrom; Tao Wang; Amy L McGuire; Jill O Robinson; Amanda M Gutierrez; Caroline H Lee; Susan G Hilsenbeck; Sharon E Plon; D Williams Parsons; Richard L Street
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2018-11-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.