Literature DB >> 26758254

Genetic Testing and Post-Testing Decision Making among BRCA-Positive Mutation Women: A Psychosocial Approach.

Sharlene Hesse-Biber1, Chen An2.   

Abstract

Through an analysis of an online survey of women who tested positive for the BRCA genetic mutation for breast cancer, this research uses a social constructionist and feminist standpoint lens to understand the decision-making process that leads BRCA-positive women to choose genetic testing. Additionally, this research examines how they socially construct and understand their risk for developing breast cancer, as well as which treatment options they undergo post-testing. BRCA-positive women re-frame their statistical medical risk for developing cancer and their post-testing treatment choices through a broad psychosocial context of engagement that also includes their social networks. Important psychosocial factors drive women's medical decisions, such as individual feelings of guilt and vulnerability, and the degree of perceived social support. Women who felt guilty and fearful that they might pass the BRCA gene to their children were more likely to undergo risk reducing surgery. Women with at least one daughter and women without children were more inclined toward the risk reducing surgery compared to those with only sons. These psychosocial factors and social network engagements serve as a "nexus of decision making" that does not, for the most part, mirror the medical assessments of statistical odds for hereditary cancer development, nor the specific treatment protocols outlined by the medical establishment.

Entities:  

Keywords:  At risk assessment; BRCA-positive mutation; Breast cancer; Genetic testing; Women’s decision-making

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26758254     DOI: 10.1007/s10897-015-9929-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Genet Couns        ISSN: 1059-7700            Impact factor:   2.537


  33 in total

Review 1.  Factors influencing breast cancer screening and risk assessment among young African American women: An integrative review of the literature.

Authors:  Tarsha P Jones; Maria C Katapodi; Joan S Lockhart
Journal:  J Am Assoc Nurse Pract       Date:  2015-03-03       Impact factor: 1.165

Review 2.  Constructions of masculinity and their influence on men's well-being: a theory of gender and health.

Authors:  W H Courtenay
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 4.634

3.  A brief assessment of concerns associated with genetic testing for cancer: the Multidimensional Impact of Cancer Risk Assessment (MICRA) questionnaire.

Authors:  David Cella; Chanita Hughes; Amy Peterman; Chih-Hung Chang; Beth N Peshkin; Marc D Schwartz; Lari Wenzel; Amy Lemke; Alfred C Marcus; Caryn Lerman
Journal:  Health Psychol       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 4.267

4.  Danger zones: risk perceptions of young women from families with hereditary breast and ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Allison V Werner-Lin
Journal:  Fam Process       Date:  2007-09

Review 5.  Cancer disparities by race/ethnicity and socioeconomic status.

Authors:  Elizabeth Ward; Ahmedin Jemal; Vilma Cokkinides; Gopal K Singh; Cheryll Cardinez; Asma Ghafoor; Michael Thun
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2004 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 508.702

6.  Risk perception among women at risk for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Robert Pilarski
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2009-04-10       Impact factor: 2.537

Review 7.  Healthy bodies, social bodies: men's and women's concepts and practices of health in everyday life.

Authors:  R Saltonstall
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 4.634

Review 8.  A systematic review of perceived risks, psychological and behavioral impacts of genetic testing.

Authors:  Jodi T Heshka; Crystal Palleschi; Heather Howley; Brenda Wilson; Philip S Wells
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 8.822

9.  Gender relations and health research: a review of current practices.

Authors:  Joan L Bottorff; John L Oliffe; Carole A Robinson; Joanne Carey
Journal:  Int J Equity Health       Date:  2011-12-13

10.  Better science with sex and gender: Facilitating the use of a sex and gender-based analysis in health research.

Authors:  Joy L Johnson; Lorraine Greaves; Robin Repta
Journal:  Int J Equity Health       Date:  2009-05-06
View more
  8 in total

1.  A Psychological Perspective on Factors Predicting Prophylactic Salpingo-Oophorectomy in a Sample of Italian Women from the General Population. Results from a Hypothetical Study in the Context of BRCA Mutations.

Authors:  Teresa Gavaruzzi; Alessandra Tasso; Marzena Franiuk; Liliana Varesco; Lorella Lotto
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2017-03-23       Impact factor: 2.537

2.  Cancer Counseling of Low-Income Limited English Proficient Latina Women Using Medical Interpreters: Implications for Shared Decision-Making.

Authors:  Daniella Kamara; Jon Weil; Janey Youngblom; Claudia Guerra; Galen Joseph
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2017-08-09       Impact factor: 2.537

3.  Perceptions and care Recommendations from Previvors: Qualitative analysis of female BRCA1/2 mutation Carriers' experience with genetic testing and counseling.

Authors:  Kate E Dibble; Laura K M Donorfio; Preston A Britner; Keith M Bellizzi
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol Rep       Date:  2022-05-02

Review 4.  Decision making for breast cancer prevention among women at elevated risk.

Authors:  Tasleem J Padamsee; Celia E Wills; Lisa D Yee; Electra D Paskett
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2017-03-24       Impact factor: 6.466

5.  Using the Health Belief Model to explore why women decide for or against the removal of their ovaries to reduce their risk of developing cancer.

Authors:  Anne Herrmann; Alix Hall; Anthony Proietto
Journal:  BMC Womens Health       Date:  2018-11-14       Impact factor: 2.809

Review 6.  Helping Patients Understand and Cope with BRCA Mutations.

Authors:  Sukh Makhnoon; Banu Arun; Isabelle Bedrosian
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2022-03-18       Impact factor: 5.945

Review 7.  Psychosocial Interventions for Women with a BRCA1 or BRCA2 Mutation: A Scoping Review.

Authors:  Talin Boghosian; Jeanna M McCuaig; Lindsay Carlsson; Kelly A Metcalfe
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2021-03-24       Impact factor: 6.639

8.  Impact of BRCA Status on Reproductive Decision-Making and Self-Concept: A Mixed-Methods Study Informing the Development of Tailored Interventions.

Authors:  Sharlene Hesse-Biber; Memnun Seven; Jing Jiang; Sara Van Schaik; Andrew A Dwyer
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-03-15       Impact factor: 6.639

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.