Literature DB >> 17473961

Information processing in the context of genetic risk: implications for genetic-risk communication.

Holly Etchegary1, Colin Perrier.   

Abstract

Communicating genetic-risk information is fraught with difficulties, and there are no universally accepted guidelines for clinical practice. In this paper, we suggest that information-processing models may offer some guidance for the communication of genetic risk. The paper reviews selected literature from health and social psychology, including defensive reactions to threatening health information, the Extended Parallel Process Model (EPPM) and Self Affirmation Theory. Ultimately, it presents the Heuristic-Systematic Model (HSM) of information processing as a useful perspective from which to view genetic-risk communication. Through our review of this literature, we identify some of the variables found to influence the systematic or heuristic processing of risk information and note their relevance to genetic counseling contexts. We suggest that systematic information processing is conducive to informed decision-making, as well as improved understanding of risk information. Clinical practice implications derived from our review of these literatures are noted.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17473961     DOI: 10.1007/s10897-006-9082-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Genet Couns        ISSN: 1059-7700            Impact factor:   2.537


  43 in total

Review 1.  Treating people with information: an analysis and review of approaches to communicating health risk information.

Authors:  A J Rothman; M T Kiviniemi
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr       Date:  1999

2.  Risk as feelings.

Authors:  G F Loewenstein; E U Weber; C K Hsee; N Welch
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 17.737

Review 3.  Risk communication strategies: state of the art and effectiveness in the context of cancer genetic services.

Authors:  Claire Julian-Reynier; Myriam Welkenhuysen; Lea Hagoel; Marleen Decruyenaere; Penelope Hopwood
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 4.246

4.  Biased reasoning: adaptive responses to health risk feedback.

Authors:  Britta Renner
Journal:  Pers Soc Psychol Bull       Date:  2004-03

5.  Predictive genetic testing and beyond: a theory of engagement.

Authors:  Marion McAllister
Journal:  J Health Psychol       Date:  2002-09

6.  Proposed model of the relationship of risk information seeking and processing to the development of preventive behaviors.

Authors:  R J Griffin; S Dunwoody; K Neuwirth
Journal:  Environ Res       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 6.498

7.  Comparative evaluation of patient information leaflets by pharmacists, doctors and the general public.

Authors:  D R Mottram; C Reed
Journal:  J Clin Pharm Ther       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 2.512

8.  The effectiveness of patient verbalization on informed consent.

Authors:  V Wadey; C Frank
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 2.089

Review 9.  Psychological impact of genetic counseling for familial cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Dejana Braithwaite; Jon Emery; Fiona Walter; A Toby Prevost; Stephen Sutton
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2004-01-21       Impact factor: 13.506

Review 10.  Psychosocial aspects of genetic screening of pregnant women and newborns: a systematic review.

Authors:  J M Green; J Hewison; H L Bekker; L D Bryant; H S Cuckle
Journal:  Health Technol Assess       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 4.014

View more
  14 in total

Review 1.  Re-conceptualizing risk in genetic counseling: implications for clinical practice.

Authors:  Jehannine C Austin
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2010-01-30       Impact factor: 2.537

2.  "Awakening to" a new meaning of being at-risk for arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy: a grounded theory study.

Authors:  April Manuel; Fern Brunger
Journal:  J Community Genet       Date:  2015-01-27

3.  Blue Genes? Understanding and Mitigating Negative Consequences of Personalized Information about Genetic Risk for Depression.

Authors:  Matthew S Lebowitz; Woo-Kyoung Ahn
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2017-08-07       Impact factor: 2.537

4.  How could disclosing incidental information from whole-genome sequencing affect patient behavior?

Authors:  Kurt D Christensen; Robert C Green
Journal:  Per Med       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 2.512

5.  Parents' and children's communication about genetic risk: a qualitative study, learning from families' experiences.

Authors:  Alison Metcalfe; Gill Plumridge; Jane Coad; Andrew Shanks; Paramjit Gill
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2011-02-16       Impact factor: 4.246

6.  Using a family history intervention to improve cancer risk perception in a black community.

Authors:  Vinaya S Murthy; Mary A Garza; Donna A Almario; Kristen J Vogel; Robin E Grubs; Elizabeth A Gettig; John W Wilson; Stephen B Thomas
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2011-07-20       Impact factor: 2.537

7.  Misunderstandings concerning genetics among patients confronting genetic disease.

Authors:  Robert L Klitzman
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2010-05-29       Impact factor: 2.537

8.  Balancing personalized medicine and personalized care.

Authors:  Kenneth Cornetta; Candy Gunther Brown
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 6.893

9.  "I know what you told me, but this is what I think:" perceived risk of Alzheimer disease among individuals who accurately recall their genetics-based risk estimate.

Authors:  Erin Linnenbringer; J Scott Roberts; Susan Hiraki; L Adrienne Cupples; Robert C Green
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 8.822

10.  Effect of genetic testing for risk of type 2 diabetes mellitus on health behaviors and outcomes: study rationale, development and design.

Authors:  Alex H Cho; Ley A Killeya-Jones; Julianne M O'Daniel; Kensaku Kawamoto; Patrick Gallagher; Susanne Haga; Joseph E Lucas; Gloria M Trujillo; Scott V Joy; Geoffrey S Ginsburg
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2012-01-18       Impact factor: 2.655

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.