Literature DB >> 15183439

Compliant positioning of total hip components for optimal range of motion.

K-H Widmer1, B Zurfluh.   

Abstract

Impingement between femoral neck and endoprosthetic cup is one of the causes for dislocation in total hip arthroplasty (THA). Choosing a correct combined orientation of both components, the acetabular cup and femoral stem, in manual or computer-assisted implantation will yield a maximized, stable range of motion (ROM) and will reduce the risk for dislocation. A mathematical model of a THA was developed to determine the optimal combination of cup inclination, cup anteversion, and stem antetorsion for maximizing ROM and minimizing the risk for cup-neck impingement. Single and combined hip joint motions were tested. A radiographic definition was used for component orientation. Additional parameters, such as stem-neck (CCD) angle, head-neck ratio, and the design of the acetabular opening, were also considered. The model showed that a maximized and safe ROM requires compliant, well-defined combinations of cup inclination, cup anteversion, and stem antetorsion depending on the intended ROM. Radiographic cup anteversion and stem antetorsion were linearly correlated. Additional internal rotation reduced flexion, and additional external rotation reduced extension, abduction and adduction. The articulating hemispheric surface of acetabular cups should be oriented between 40 degrees and 45 degrees of radiographic inclination, between 20 degrees and 28 degrees of radiographic cup anteversion, and should be combined with stem antetorsion so that the sum of cup anteversion plus 0.7 times the stem antetorsion equals 37 degrees. Final component orientation must also consider cup containment, implant impingement with bone and soft tissue, and preoperative skeletal contractures or deformities to achieve the optimal compromise for each patient.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15183439     DOI: 10.1016/j.orthres.2003.11.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Orthop Res        ISSN: 0736-0266            Impact factor:   3.494


  140 in total

1.  [Principles and new concepts in computer-navigated total hip arthroplasty].

Authors:  T Renkawitz; M Wörner; E Sendtner; M Weber; P Lechler; J Grifka
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 1.087

2.  Wear degradation of long-term in vivo exposed alumina-on-alumina hip joints: linking nanometer-scale phenomena to macroscopic joint design.

Authors:  Yasuhito Takahashi; Nobuhiko Sugano; Wenliang Zhu; Takashi Nishii; Takashi Sakai; Masaki Takao; Giuseppe Pezzotti
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2011-11-22       Impact factor: 3.896

3.  The association between the sagittal femoral stem alignment and the resulting femoral head centre in total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Michael Müller; Dirk Crucius; Carsten Perka; Stephan Tohtz
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2010-06-13       Impact factor: 3.075

4.  Supercapsular percutaneously-assisted total hip arthroplasty: radiographic outcomes and surgical technique.

Authors:  Paul K Della Torre; David A Fitch; James C Chow
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2015-08

5.  A critical analysis of radiographic factors in patients who develop dislocation after elective primary total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Marion Opperer; Yuo-yu Lee; Francisco Nally; Alvaro Blanes Perez; Kaveh Goudarz-Mehdikhani; Alejandro Gonzalez Della Valle
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2015-10-27       Impact factor: 3.075

6.  Comparison of robotic-assisted and conventional acetabular cup placement in THA: a matched-pair controlled study.

Authors:  Benjamin G Domb; Youssef F El Bitar; Adam Y Sadik; Christine E Stake; Itamar B Botser
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-08-29       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  Combined anteversion technique reduced the dislocation in cementless total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Yasuharu Nakashima; Masanobu Hirata; Mio Akiyama; Takashi Itokawa; Takuaki Yamamoto; Goro Motomura; Masanobu Ohishi; Satoshi Hamai; Yukihide Iwamoto
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2013-09-13       Impact factor: 3.075

8.  Range of motion measurement of an artificial hip joint using CT images.

Authors:  Haosheng Sun; Hidenori Inaoka; Yutaka Fukuoka; Tadashi Masuda; Akimasa Ishida; Sadao Morita
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2007-09-26       Impact factor: 2.602

Review 9.  Containment versus impingement: finding a compromise for cup placement in total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  K-H Widmer
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 3.075

10.  Does the surgical approach influence the implant alignment in total hip arthroplasty? Comparative study between the direct anterior and the anterolateral approaches in the supine position.

Authors:  Yuya Kawarai; Satoshi Iida; Junichi Nakamura; Yoshiyuki Shinada; Chiho Suzuki; Seiji Ohtori
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2017-05-31       Impact factor: 3.075

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.