Literature DB >> 17343286

Anteroposterior pelvic radiographs to assess acetabular retroversion: high validity of the "cross-over-sign".

Amir A Jamali1, Kiril Mladenov, Dominik C Meyer, Alberto Martinez, Martin Beck, Reinhold Ganz, Michael Leunig.   

Abstract

Acetabular retroversion has been proposed to contribute to the development of osteoarthritis of the hip. For the diagnosis of this condition, conventional AP pelvic radiographs may represent a reliable, easily available diagnostic modality as they can be obtained with a reproducible technique allowing the anterior and posterior acetabular rims to be visible for assessment. This study was designed to: (i) determine cranial, central, and caudal anatomic acetabular version (AV) from cadaveric specimens; (ii) establish the validity and reliability of the radiographic measurements of central acetabular anteversion; and (iii) determine the validity and reliability of the radiographic "cross-over-sign" to detect acetabular retroversion. Using 43 desiccated pelvises (86 acetabuli) the anatomic AVs were measured at three different transverse planes (cranially, centrally, and caudally). From these pelvises, standardized AP pelvic radiographs were obtained. To directly measure central AV, a modified radiographic method is introduced for the use of AP pelvic radiographs. The validity and reliability of this radiographic method and of the radiographic cross-over-sign to detect cranial acetabular retroversion were determined. The mean central and caudal anatomic AVs were approximately 20 degrees , and the mean cranial AV was 8 degrees . Cranial retroversion (AV < 0 degrees ) was present in 19 of 86 hips (22%). A linear correlation was found between the central and cranial AV. Below 10 degrees of central AV, all acetabuli were cranially retroverted. Between 10 degrees and 20 degrees , 30% of the acetabuli were cranially retroverted, and above 20 degrees , only 1 of 45 acetabuli was cranially retroverted. The radiographic measurement of the central AV (20.3 +/- 6.5 degrees ) correlated strongly with the anatomic AV (20.1 +/- 6.4 degrees ). The sensitivity of the cross-over-sign to detect a cranial acetabular anteversion of less than 4 degrees was 96%, its specificity 95%, and the positive predictive and negative predictive values 90% and 98%, respectively. Both the modified radiographic anteversion measurements and the cross-over-sign demonstrated substantial inter- and intraobserver reliability. Retroversion is almost exclusively a problem of the cranial acetabulum. The cranial AV is on average 12 degrees lower than the central AV, with the latter directly measurable from AP pelvic radiographs. A central AV of less than 10 degrees was associated with cranial retroversion. The presence of a positive cross-over-sign is a highly reliable indicator of cranial AV of <4 degrees. (c) 2007 Orthopaedic Research Society. Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17343286     DOI: 10.1002/jor.20380

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Orthop Res        ISSN: 0736-0266            Impact factor:   3.494


  120 in total

1.  Ischial spine sign reveals acetabular retroversion in Legg-Calvé-Perthes disease.

Authors:  A Noelle Larson; Anthony A Stans; Rafael J Sierra
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2011-01-29       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Preoperative three-dimensional CT predicts intraoperative findings in hip arthroscopy.

Authors:  Benton E Heyworth; Mark M Dolan; Joseph T Nguyen; Neal C Chen; Bryan T Kelly
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2012-04-13       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Femoroacetabular impingement syndrome: a narrative review for the chiropractor.

Authors:  Peter Emary
Journal:  J Can Chiropr Assoc       Date:  2010-09

4.  Reliability of radiographic signs for acetabular retroversion.

Authors:  Thomas Kappe; Tugrul Kocak; Carl Neuerburg; Sabine Lippacher; Ralf Bieger; Heiko Reichel
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2010-05-10       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 5.  Case report: Bifid iliopsoas tendon causing refractory internal snapping hip.

Authors:  Beatrice Shu; Marc R Safran
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2010-07-01       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  Reliability and agreement of measures used in radiographic evaluation of the adult hip.

Authors:  Nicholas H Mast; Franco Impellizzeri; Stephan Keller; Michael Leunig
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2010-07-02       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  CT reveals a high incidence of osseous abnormalities in hips with labral tears.

Authors:  Mark M Dolan; Benton E Heyworth; Asheesh Bedi; Gavin Duke; Bryan T Kelly
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2010-10-01       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  The validity of a non-radiologist reader in identifying cam and pincer femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) using plain radiography.

Authors:  C Ratzlaff; C Zhang; J Korzan; L Josey; H Wong; J Cibere; H M Prlic; J A Kopec; J M Esdaile; L C Li; M Barber; B B Forster
Journal:  Rheumatol Int       Date:  2015-10-03       Impact factor: 2.631

9.  Multilevel measurement of acetabular version using 3-D CT-generated models: implications for hip preservation surgery.

Authors:  Aimee C Perreira; John C Hunter; Thaddeus Laird; Amir A Jamali
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2010-09-25       Impact factor: 4.176

10.  Herniation pits as a radiographic indicator of pincer-type femoroacetabular impingement in symptomatic patients.

Authors:  Hyung-Min Ji; Ji-Hoon Baek; Kyoung-Woon Kim; Ji-Woong Yoon; Yong-Chan Ha
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2013-11-27       Impact factor: 4.342

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.