Literature DB >> 19695281

Contrast polarity differences reduce crowding but do not benefit reading performance in peripheral vision.

Susana T L Chung1, J Stephen Mansfield.   

Abstract

Previous studies have shown that the spatial extent of crowding in peripheral vision is reduced when a target letter and its flanking letters have opposite contrast polarity. We have examined if this reduction in crowding leads to improved reading performance. We compared the spatial extent of crowding, visual-span profiles (plots of letter-recognition accuracy versus letter position), and reading speed at 10 degrees inferior visual field, using white letters, black letters, or mixtures of white and black letters, presented on a mid-gray background. Consistent with previous studies, the spatial extent of crowding was reduced when the target and flanking letters had opposite contrast polarity. However, using mixed contrast polarity did not lead to improvements in visual-span profiles or reading speed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19695281      PMCID: PMC2783877          DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2009.08.013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  44 in total

1.  Apparent string shortening concomitant with letter crowding.

Authors:  L Liu; A Arditi
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 1.886

2.  Psychophysics of reading. XX. Linking letter recognition to reading speed in central and peripheral vision.

Authors:  G E Legge; J S Mansfield; S T Chung
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 1.886

3.  The spatial resolution of visual attention.

Authors:  J Intriligator; P Cavanagh
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 3.468

4.  The effect of letter spacing on reading speed in central and peripheral vision.

Authors:  Susana T L Chung
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 4.799

5.  Spatial-frequency and contrast properties of crowding.

Authors:  S T Chung; D M Levi; G E Legge
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 1.886

6.  Contour interaction in fovea and periphery.

Authors:  R F Hess; S C Dakin; N Kapoor; M Tewfik
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 2.129

7.  Suppressive and facilitatory spatial interactions in peripheral vision: peripheral crowding is neither size invariant nor simple contrast masking.

Authors:  Dennis M Levi; Srividhya Hariharan; Stanley A Klein
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 2.240

8.  Visual acuity with reversed-contrast charts: I. Theoretical and psychophysical investigations.

Authors:  Gerald Westheimer
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 1.973

9.  The extent of crowding in peripheral vision does not scale with target size.

Authors:  Srimant P Tripathy; Patrick Cavanagh
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 1.886

10.  Precision of position signals for letters.

Authors:  Susana T L Chung; Gordon E Legge
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2009-05-19       Impact factor: 1.886

View more
  21 in total

1.  Rapid and long-lasting reduction of crowding through training.

Authors:  Amit Yashar; Jiageng Chen; Marisa Carrasco
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 2.240

2.  Sensory and cognitive influences on the training-related improvement of reading speed in peripheral vision.

Authors:  Yingchen He; Gordon E Legge; Deyue Yu
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2013-06-24       Impact factor: 2.240

3.  Crowding by a repeating pattern.

Authors:  Sarah Rosen; Denis G Pelli
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 2.240

4.  Cube search, revisited.

Authors:  Xuetao Zhang; Jie Huang; Serap Yigit-Elliott; Ruth Rosenholtz
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2015-03-16       Impact factor: 2.240

5.  The dependence of crowding on flanker complexity and target-flanker similarity.

Authors:  Jean-Baptiste Bernard; Susana T L Chung
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2011-07-05       Impact factor: 2.240

6.  How do flanking objects affect reaching and grasping behavior in participants with macular disorders?

Authors:  Shahina Pardhan; Carmen Gonzalez-Alvarez; Ahalya Subramanian; Susana T L Chung
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2012-09-28       Impact factor: 4.799

7.  Unmasking saccadic uncrowding.

Authors:  Mehmet N Ağaoğlu; Haluk Öğmen; Susana T L Chung
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2016-09-02       Impact factor: 1.886

Review 8.  Enhancing visual performance for people with central vision loss.

Authors:  Susana T L Chung
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 1.973

9.  Dependence of reading speed on letter spacing in central vision loss.

Authors:  Susana T L Chung
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 1.973

10.  Crowding in the S-cone pathway.

Authors:  Daniel R Coates; Susana T L Chung
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2016-04-17       Impact factor: 1.886

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.