Literature DB >> 10975361

Contour interaction in fovea and periphery.

R F Hess1, S C Dakin, N Kapoor, M Tewfik.   

Abstract

It has been known for some time that both foveal and peripheral visual acuity are higher for single letters than for letters in a row. Early work showed that this was due to the destructive interaction of adjacent contours (termed contour interaction). It has been assumed to have a neural basis, and a number of competing explanations have been advanced that implicate either high-level or low-level stages of visual processing. Our previous results for foveal vision suggested a much simpler explanation, one determined primarily by the physics of the stimulus rather than the physiology of the visual system. We show that, under conditions of contour interaction or crowding, the most relevant physical spatial-frequency band of the letter is displaced to higher spatial frequencies and that foveal vision tracks this change in spatial scale. In the periphery, however, beyond 5 degrees, the physical explanation is not sufficient. Here we show that there are genuine physiological lateral spatial interactions, which are due to changes in the spatial scale of analysis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10975361     DOI: 10.1364/josaa.17.001516

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis        ISSN: 1084-7529            Impact factor:   2.129


  11 in total

1.  Shift in spatial scale in identifying crowded letters.

Authors:  Susana T L Chung; Bosco S Tjan
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2007-01-16       Impact factor: 1.886

2.  Crowding is tuned for perceived (not physical) location.

Authors:  Steven C Dakin; John A Greenwood; Thomas A Carlson; Peter J Bex
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2011-08-08       Impact factor: 2.240

3.  Crowding by a repeating pattern.

Authors:  Sarah Rosen; Denis G Pelli
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 2.240

4.  Radial-tangential anisotropy of crowding in the early visual areas.

Authors:  MiYoung Kwon; Pinglei Bao; Rachel Millin; Bosco S Tjan
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2014-08-13       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Crowding follows the binding of relative position and orientation.

Authors:  John A Greenwood; Peter J Bex; Steven C Dakin
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2012-03-21       Impact factor: 2.240

6.  Crowding changes appearance.

Authors:  John A Greenwood; Peter J Bex; Steven C Dakin
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2010-03-04       Impact factor: 10.834

7.  Contrast polarity differences reduce crowding but do not benefit reading performance in peripheral vision.

Authors:  Susana T L Chung; J Stephen Mansfield
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2009-08-18       Impact factor: 1.886

8.  Factors affecting crowded acuity: eccentricity and contrast.

Authors:  Daniel R Coates; Jeremy M Chin; Susana T L Chung
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 1.973

Review 9.  Crowding--an essential bottleneck for object recognition: a mini-review.

Authors:  Dennis M Levi
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2008-01-28       Impact factor: 1.886

10.  A Comparison of Foveal and Peripheral Contour Interaction and Crowding.

Authors:  Stephanie M Marten-Ellis; Harold E Bedell
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2021-01-01       Impact factor: 2.106

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.