Literature DB >> 11689021

The spatial resolution of visual attention.

J Intriligator1, P Cavanagh.   

Abstract

Two tasks were used to evaluate the grain of visual attention, the minimum spacing at which attention can select individual items. First, observers performed a tracking task at many viewing distances. When the display subtended less than 1 degrees in size, tracking was no longer possible even though observers could resolve the items and their motions: The items were visible but could not be individuated one from the other. The limiting size for selection was roughly the same whether tracking one or three targets, suggesting that the resolution limit acts independently of the capacity limit of attention. Second, the closest spacing that still allowed individuation of single items in dense, static displays was examined. This critical spacing was about 50% coarser in the radial direction compared to the tangential direction and was coarser in the upper as opposed to the lower visual field. The results suggest that no more than about 60 items can be arrayed in the central 30 degrees of the visual field while still allowing attentional access to each individually. Our data show that selection has a coarse grain, much coarser than visual resolution. These measures of the resolution of attention are based solely on the selection of location and are not confounded with preattentive feature interactions that may contribute to measures from flanker and crowding tasks. The results suggest that the parietal area is the most likely locus of this selection mechanism and that it acts by pointing to the spatial coordinates (or cortical coordinates) of items of interest rather than by holding a representation of the items themselves. Copyright 2001 Academic Press.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11689021     DOI: 10.1006/cogp.2001.0755

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cogn Psychol        ISSN: 0010-0285            Impact factor:   3.468


  187 in total

1.  Resolution of spatial and temporal visual attention in infants with fragile X syndrome.

Authors:  Faraz Farzin; Susan M Rivera; David Whitney
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 13.501

2.  The scaling of spatial attention in visual search and its modification in healthy aging.

Authors:  P M Greenwood; Raja Parasuraman
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2004-01

3.  Anatomical constraints on attention: hemifield independence is a signature of multifocal spatial selection.

Authors:  George A Alvarez; Jonathan Gill; Patrick Cavanagh
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2012-05-25       Impact factor: 2.240

4.  Fundamental differences in change detection between vision and audition.

Authors:  Laurent Demany; Catherine Semal; Jean-René Cazalets; Daniel Pressnitzer
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-04-06       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Effects of distractors on the perception of right angles.

Authors:  A Bulatov; A Bertulis; A Bieliavicius; E Loginovic
Journal:  Neurosci Behav Physiol       Date:  2010-06-08

6.  Crowding in Visual Working Memory Reveals Its Spatial Resolution and the Nature of Its Representations.

Authors:  Benjamin J Tamber-Rosenau; Anat R Fintzi; René Marois
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2015-08-13

7.  Hierarchical number estimation.

Authors:  Jay Friedenberg; William Limratana
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2004-01-16

8.  Topographic maps of visual spatial attention in human parietal cortex.

Authors:  Michael A Silver; David Ress; David J Heeger
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2005-04-07       Impact factor: 2.714

9.  Efficiency of extracting stereo-driven object motions.

Authors:  Anshul Jain; Qasim Zaidi
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2013-01-16       Impact factor: 2.240

10.  Investigating temporal properties of covert shifts of visual attention using the attentional walk task.

Authors:  Elisabeth Hein; Cathleen M Moore
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2010-02
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.