Literature DB >> 10738065

Apparent string shortening concomitant with letter crowding.

L Liu1, A Arditi.   

Abstract

In our previous studies of the crowding effect, we have observed that human observers tend to underestimate the length of a letter string (the number of letters in the string) when the letters are close to visual acuity, and the interletter spacings are small. In this study, we asked our observers to identify letters in randomly presented four-letter and five-letter strings. We found that, when a priori knowledge of the lengths of letter strings was not available, the probability of underestimating string length increased with decreasing interletter spacing. The causes of underestimation errors appeared to be the omission of an interior letter and the merging of two neighboring letters. Since our experiments were conducted in the foveal region, neither spatial uncertainty nor split attention can explain the underestimation errors. The effect of the point spread function of the eye on closely packed letter strings is discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10738065     DOI: 10.1016/s0042-6989(99)00247-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  12 in total

1.  The mechanism of word crowding.

Authors:  Deyue Yu; Melanie M U Akau; Susana T L Chung
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2011-11-07       Impact factor: 1.886

2.  Reading speed benefits from increased vertical word spacing in normal peripheral vision.

Authors:  Susana T L Chung
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 1.973

3.  The relationship between word length and threshold character size in patients with central scotoma and eccentric fixation.

Authors:  Anouk Déruaz; Mira Goldschmidt; Christophe Mermoud; Andrew R Whatham; Avinoam B Safran
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2005-09-15       Impact factor: 3.117

4.  The Bouma law of crowding, revised: critical spacing is equal across parts, not objects.

Authors:  Sarah Rosen; Ramakrishna Chakravarthi; Denis G Pelli
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2014-12-10       Impact factor: 2.240

5.  Contrast polarity differences reduce crowding but do not benefit reading performance in peripheral vision.

Authors:  Susana T L Chung; J Stephen Mansfield
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2009-08-18       Impact factor: 1.886

6.  Spatial allocation of attention during smooth pursuit eye movements.

Authors:  Lee P Lovejoy; Garth A Fowler; Richard J Krauzlis
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 1.886

7.  Precision of position signals for letters.

Authors:  Susana T L Chung; Gordon E Legge
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2009-05-19       Impact factor: 1.886

Review 8.  Crowding--an essential bottleneck for object recognition: a mini-review.

Authors:  Dennis M Levi
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2008-01-28       Impact factor: 1.886

9.  Diagnosing the Periphery: Using the Rey-Osterrieth Complex Figure Drawing Test to Characterize Peripheral Visual Function.

Authors:  Daniel R Coates; Johan Wagemans; Bilge Sayim
Journal:  Iperception       Date:  2017-05-29

Review 10.  Seven Myths on Crowding and Peripheral Vision.

Authors:  Hans Strasburger
Journal:  Iperception       Date:  2020-05-19
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.