Literature DB >> 27591134

Unmasking saccadic uncrowding.

Mehmet N Ağaoğlu1, Haluk Öğmen2, Susana T L Chung3.   

Abstract

Stimuli that are briefly presented around the time of saccades are often perceived with spatiotemporal distortions. These distortions do not always have deleterious effects on the visibility and identification of a stimulus. Recent studies reported that when a stimulus is the target of an intended saccade, it is released from both masking and crowding. Here, we investigated pre-saccadic changes in single and crowded letter recognition performance in the absence (Experiment 1) and the presence (Experiment 2) of backward masks to determine the extent to which saccadic "uncrowding" and "unmasking" mechanisms are similar. Our results show that pre-saccadic improvements in letter recognition performance are mostly due to the presence of masks and/or stimulus transients which occur after the target is presented. More importantly, we did not find any decrease in crowding strength before impending saccades. A simplified version of a dual-channel neural model, originally proposed to explain masking phenomena, with several saccadic add-on mechanisms, could account for our results in Experiment 1. However, this model falls short in explaining how saccades drastically reduced the effect of backward masking (Experiment 2). The addition of a remapping mechanism that alters the relative spatial positions of stimuli was needed to fully account for the improvements observed when backward masks followed the letter stimuli. Taken together, our results (i) are inconsistent with saccadic uncrowding, (ii) strongly support saccadic unmasking, and (iii) suggest that pre-saccadic letter recognition is modulated by multiple perisaccadic mechanisms with different time courses.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Crowding; Masking; Neural modeling; Perisaccadic perception; Remapping

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27591134      PMCID: PMC5035636          DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2016.08.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  76 in total

1.  Failure to detect displacement of the visual world during saccadic eye movements.

Authors:  B Bridgeman; D Hendry; L Stark
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1975-06       Impact factor: 1.886

2.  The extent of crowding in peripheral vision does not scale with target size.

Authors:  Srimant P Tripathy; Patrick Cavanagh
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 1.886

3.  The updating of the representation of visual space in parietal cortex by intended eye movements.

Authors:  J R Duhamel; C L Colby; M E Goldberg
Journal:  Science       Date:  1992-01-03       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  Effect of saccadic adaptation on localization of visual targets.

Authors:  Holger Awater; David Burr; Markus Lappe; M Concetta Morrone; Michael E Goldberg
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2005-04-20       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Grouping, pooling, and when bigger is better in visual crowding.

Authors:  Mauro Manassi; Bilge Sayim; Michael H Herzog
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2012-09-26       Impact factor: 2.240

6.  Effects of number, complexity, and familiarity of flankers on crowded letter identification.

Authors:  Myriam Chanceaux; Sebastiaan Mathôt; Jonathan Grainger
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2014-11-10       Impact factor: 2.240

7.  Large crowding zones in peripheral vision for briefly presented stimuli.

Authors:  Srimant Prasad Tripathy; Patrick Cavanagh; Harold E Bedell
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2014-12-30       Impact factor: 2.240

8.  A distinct contribution of the frontal eye field to the visual representation of saccadic targets.

Authors:  Behrad Noudoost; Kelsey L Clark; Tirin Moore
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2014-03-05       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Recovery of a crowded object by masking the flankers: determining the locus of feature integration.

Authors:  Ramakrishna Chakravarthi; Patrick Cavanagh
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2009-09-04       Impact factor: 2.240

10.  Counterproductive effect of saccadic suppression during attention shifts.

Authors:  Alexandre Zénon; Brian D Corneil; Andrea Alamia; Nabil Filali-Sadouk; Etienne Olivier
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-01-23       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  4 in total

1.  Pre-saccadic perception: Separate time courses for enhancement and spatial pooling at the saccade target.

Authors:  Antimo Buonocore; Alessio Fracasso; David Melcher
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-06-14       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  Visual crowding is a combination of an increase of positional uncertainty, source confusion, and featural averaging.

Authors:  William J Harrison; Peter J Bex
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-04-05       Impact factor: 4.379

3.  Interaction between stimulus contrast and pre-saccadic crowding.

Authors:  Mehmet N Agaoglu; Susana T L Chung
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2017-02-01       Impact factor: 2.963

4.  Microsaccadic correlates of covert attention and crowding.

Authors:  Krishnamachari S Prahalad; Daniel R Coates
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2022-09-02       Impact factor: 2.004

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.