Literature DB >> 12350424

The extent of crowding in peripheral vision does not scale with target size.

Srimant P Tripathy1, Patrick Cavanagh.   

Abstract

Identifying a target is more difficult when distracters are present within a zone of interaction around the target. We investigated whether the spatial extent of the zone of interaction scales with the size of the target. Our target was a letter T in one-of-four orientations. Our distracters were four squared-thetas in one-of-two orientations, presented one in each of the four cardinal directions, equidistant from the target. Target-distracter separation was varied and the proportion of correct responses at each separation was determined. From these the extent of interaction was estimated. This procedure was repeated for different target sizes spread over a 5-fold range. In each case, the contrast of the target was adjusted so that its visibility was constant across target sizes. The experiment was performed in the luminance domain (grey targets on grey background) and in the chromatic domain (green target on equiluminant grey background). In the luminance domain, target size had only a small effect on the extent of interaction; these interactions did not scale with target size. The extents of interaction for chromatic stimuli were similar to those for luminance stimuli. For a fixed target visibility, decreasing the duration of the stimulus resulted in an increase in the extent of interaction. The relevance of our findings is discussed with regard to a variety of proposed explanations for crowding. Our results are consistent with an attention-based explanation for crowding.

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12350424     DOI: 10.1016/s0042-6989(02)00197-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  61 in total

1.  Resolution of spatial and temporal visual attention in infants with fragile X syndrome.

Authors:  Faraz Farzin; Susan M Rivera; David Whitney
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 13.501

2.  The relationship between word length and threshold character size in patients with central scotoma and eccentric fixation.

Authors:  Anouk Déruaz; Mira Goldschmidt; Christophe Mermoud; Andrew R Whatham; Avinoam B Safran
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2005-09-15       Impact factor: 3.117

3.  How important is lateral masking in visual search?

Authors:  A H Wertheim; I T C Hooge; K Krikke; A Johnson
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-11-23       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Shift in spatial scale in identifying crowded letters.

Authors:  Susana T L Chung; Bosco S Tjan
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2007-01-16       Impact factor: 1.886

5.  Action-video-game experience alters the spatial resolution of vision.

Authors:  C S Green; D Bavelier
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2007-01

6.  Crowding and surround suppression: not to be confused.

Authors:  Yury Petrov; Ariella V Popple; Suzanne P McKee
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2007-04-25       Impact factor: 2.240

7.  The nature of letter crowding as revealed by first- and second-order classification images.

Authors:  Anirvan S Nandy; Bosco S Tjan
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2007-02-07       Impact factor: 2.240

8.  Learning to identify crowded letters: does it improve reading speed?

Authors:  Susana T L Chung
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2007-10-24       Impact factor: 1.886

9.  Contour interaction in foveal vision: a response to Siderov, Waugh, and Bedell (2013).

Authors:  Daniel R Coates; Dennis M Levi
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2013-11-08       Impact factor: 1.886

10.  Dissociable effects of attention and crowding on orientation averaging.

Authors:  Steven C Dakin; Peter J Bex; John R Cass; Roger J Watt
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2009-10-29       Impact factor: 2.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.