Literature DB >> 19673211

Methodology for generating a 3D computerized breast phantom from empirical data.

Christina M Li1, W Paul Segars, Georgia D Tourassi, John M Boone, James T Dobbins.   

Abstract

The initial process for creating a flexible three-dimensional computer-generated breast phantom based on empirical data is described. Dedicated breast computed-tomography data were processed to suppress noise and scatter artifacts in the reconstructed image set. An automated algorithm was developed to classify the breast into its primary components. A preliminary phantom defined using subdivision surfaces was generated from the segmented data. To demonstrate potential applications of the phantom, simulated mammographic image data were acquired of the phantom using a simplistic compression model and an analytic projection algorithm directly on the surface model. The simulated image was generated using a model for a polyenergetic cone-beam projection of the compressed phantom. The methods used to create the breast phantom generate resulting images that have a high level of tissue structure detail available and appear similar to actual mammograms. Fractal dimension measurements of simulated images of the phantom are comparatively similar to measurements from images of real human subjects. A realistic and geometrically defined breast phantom that can accurately simulate imaging data may have many applications in breast imaging research.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19673211      PMCID: PMC2832041          DOI: 10.1118/1.3140588

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  27 in total

1.  A statistical methodology for mammographic density detection.

Authors:  J J Heine; R P Velthuizen
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  Mammogram synthesis using a three-dimensional simulation. III. Modeling and evaluation of the breast ductal network.

Authors:  Predrag R Bakic; Michael Albert; Dragana Brzakovic; Andrew D A Maidment
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  A high-resolution voxel phantom of the breast for dose calculations in mammography.

Authors:  Christoph Hoeschen; Ute Fill; Maria Zankl; Werner Panzer; Dieter Regulla; Wilfried Döhring
Journal:  Radiat Prot Dosimetry       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 0.972

4.  Evaluation of the spatial resolution characteristics of a cone-beam breast CT scanner.

Authors:  Alexander L C Kwan; John M Boone; Kai Yang; Shih-Ying Huang
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 4.071

5.  Analysis of a novel offset cone-beam computed mammotomography system geometry for accomodating various breast sizes.

Authors:  Randolph L McKinley; Martin P Tornai; Caryl Brzymialkiewicz; Priti Madhav; Ehsan Samei; James E Bowsher
Journal:  Phys Med       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 2.685

6.  Characterisation of mammographic parenchymal pattern by fractal dimension.

Authors:  C B Caldwell; S J Stapleton; D W Holdsworth; R A Jong; W J Weiser; G Cooke; M J Yaffe
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  1990-02       Impact factor: 3.609

7.  Computed tomography for imaging the breast.

Authors:  John M Boone; Alex L C Kwan; Kai Yang; George W Burkett; Karen K Lindfors; Thomas R Nelson
Journal:  J Mammary Gland Biol Neoplasia       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 2.673

8.  Fractal analysis of trabecular patterns in projection radiographs. An assessment.

Authors:  J Chen; B Zheng; Y H Chang; C C Shaw; J D Towers; D Gur
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  1994-06       Impact factor: 6.016

9.  Dedicated breast computed tomography: volume image denoising via a partial-diffusion equation based technique.

Authors:  Jessie Q Xia; Joseph Y Lo; Kai Yang; Carey E Floyd; John M Boone
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 4.071

10.  Realistic CT simulation using the 4D XCAT phantom.

Authors:  W P Segars; M Mahesh; T J Beck; E C Frey; B M W Tsui
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 4.071

View more
  29 in total

1.  Optimized generation of high resolution breast anthropomorphic software phantoms.

Authors:  David D Pokrajac; Andrew D A Maidment; Predrag R Bakic
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  An analysis of the mechanical parameters used for finite element compression of a high-resolution 3D breast phantom.

Authors:  Christina M L Hsu; Mark L Palmeri; W Paul Segars; Alexander I Veress; James T Dobbins
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  A statistically defined anthropomorphic software breast phantom.

Authors:  Beverly A Lau; Ingrid Reiser; Robert M Nishikawa; Predrag R Bakic
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 4.071

4.  Population of 224 realistic human subject-based computational breast phantoms.

Authors:  David W Erickson; Jered R Wells; Gregory M Sturgeon; Ehsan Samei; James T Dobbins; W Paul Segars; Joseph Y Lo
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 4.071

5.  A statistical, task-based evaluation method for three-dimensional x-ray breast imaging systems using variable-background phantoms.

Authors:  Subok Park; Robert Jennings; Haimo Liu; Aldo Badano; Kyle Myers
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 4.071

6.  Development and characterization of an anthropomorphic breast software phantom based upon region-growing algorithm.

Authors:  Predrag R Bakic; Cuiping Zhang; Andrew D A Maidment
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 4.071

7.  Advances in Computational Human Phantoms and Their Applications in Biomedical Engineering - A Topical Review.

Authors:  Wolfgang Kainz; Esra Neufeld; Wesley E Bolch; Christian G Graff; Chan Hyeong Kim; Niels Kuster; Bryn Lloyd; Tina Morrison; Paul Segars; Yeon Soo Yeom; Maria Zankl; X George Xu; Benjamin M W Tsui
Journal:  IEEE Trans Radiat Plasma Med Sci       Date:  2019-01

8.  Anthropomorphic dual-lattice voxel models for optimizing image quality and dose.

Authors:  Nina Petoussi-Henss; Helmut Schlattl; Janine Becker; Matthias Greiter; Maria Zankl; Christoph Hoeschen
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2017-03-30

9.  Objective models of compressed breast shapes undergoing mammography.

Authors:  Steve Si Jia Feng; Bhavika Patel; Ioannis Sechopoulos
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 4.071

10.  Generation of voxelized breast phantoms from surgical mastectomy specimens.

Authors:  J Michael O'Connor; Mini Das; Clay S Dider; Mufeed Mahd; Stephen J Glick
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 4.071

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.