Literature DB >> 11190946

A statistical methodology for mammographic density detection.

J J Heine1, R P Velthuizen.   

Abstract

A statistical methodology is presented based on a chi-square probability analysis that allows the automated discrimination of radiolucent tissue (fat) from radiographic densities (fibroglandular tissue) in digitized mammograms. The method is based on earlier work developed at this facility that shows mammograms may be considered as evolving from a linear filtering operation where a random input field is passed through a 1/f filtering process. The filtering process is reversible which allows the solution of the input field with knowledge obtained from the raw image (the output). The input field solution is analogous to a prewhitening technique or deconvolution. This field contains all the information of the raw image in a much simplified format that can be approximated and analyzed with parametric methods. In the work presented here evidence indicates that there are two random events occurring in the input field with differing variances: (1) one relating to fat tissue with the smaller variance, and (2) the second relating to all other tissue with the larger variance. A statistical comparison of the variances is made by scanning the image with a small search window. A relaxation method allows for making a reliable estimate of the smaller variance which is considered as the global reference. If a local variance deviates significantly from the reference variance, based on chi-square analysis, it is labeled as nonfat; otherwise it is labeled as fat. This statistical test procedure results in a region by region continuous labeling of fat and nonfat tissue across the image. In the work presented here, the emphasis is on the methodology development with supporting preliminary results that are very encouraging. It is widely accepted that mammographic density is a breast cancer risk factor. An important application of this work is to incorporate density-based risk analysis into the ongoing statistical-based detection work developed at this facility. Additional applications include risk analysis dependent on either percentages or total amounts of fat or dense tissue. This work may be considered as the initial step in introducing many of the known breast cancer risk factors into the actual image data analysis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11190946     DOI: 10.1118/1.1323981

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  11 in total

1.  Computing mammographic density from a multiple regression model constructed with image-acquisition parameters from a full-field digital mammographic unit.

Authors:  Lee-Jane W Lu; Thomas K Nishino; Tuenchit Khamapirad; James J Grady; Morton H Leonard; Donald G Brunder
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2007-07-30       Impact factor: 3.609

2.  Quantification of breast density with dual energy mammography: a simulation study.

Authors:  Justin L Ducote; Sabee Molloi
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  Characterization and classification of tumor lesions using computerized fractal-based texture analysis and support vector machines in digital mammograms.

Authors:  Qi Guo; Jiaqing Shao; Virginie F Ruiz
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2008-10-28       Impact factor: 2.924

4.  Methodology for generating a 3D computerized breast phantom from empirical data.

Authors:  Christina M Li; W Paul Segars; Georgia D Tourassi; John M Boone; James T Dobbins
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 4.071

5.  Automated Volumetric Breast Density derived by Shape and Appearance Modeling.

Authors:  Serghei Malkov; Karla Kerlikowske; John Shepherd
Journal:  Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng       Date:  2014-03-22

6.  Spatial Correlation and Breast Cancer Risk.

Authors:  Erin E E Fowler; Cassandra Hathaway; Fabryann Tillman; Robert Weinfurtner; Thomas A Sellers; John Heine
Journal:  Biomed Phys Eng Express       Date:  2019-05-22

7.  Full field digital mammography and breast density: comparison of calibrated and noncalibrated measurements.

Authors:  John J Heine; Erin E E Fowler; Chris I Flowers
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 3.173

8.  An automated approach for estimation of breast density.

Authors:  John J Heine; Michael J Carston; Christopher G Scott; Kathleen R Brandt; Fang-Fang Wu; Vernon Shane Pankratz; Thomas A Sellers; Celine M Vachon
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 4.254

9.  Automated Percentage of Breast Density Measurements for Full-field Digital Mammography Applications.

Authors:  Erin E E Fowler; Celine M Vachon; Christopher G Scott; Thomas A Sellers; John J Heine
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 3.173

10.  Automated percent mammographic density, mammographic texture variation, and risk of breast cancer: a nested case-control study.

Authors:  Erica T Warner; Megan S Rice; Oana A Zeleznik; Erin E Fowler; Divya Murthy; Celine M Vachon; Kimberly A Bertrand; Bernard A Rosner; John Heine; Rulla M Tamimi
Journal:  NPJ Breast Cancer       Date:  2021-05-31
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.