Literature DB >> 23556909

Generation of voxelized breast phantoms from surgical mastectomy specimens.

J Michael O'Connor1, Mini Das, Clay S Dider, Mufeed Mahd, Stephen J Glick.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: In the research and development of dedicated tomographic breast imaging systems, digital breast object models, also known as digital phantoms, are useful tools. While various digital breast phantoms do exist, the purpose of this study was to develop a realistic high-resolution model suitable for simulating three-dimensional (3D) breast imaging modalities. The primary goal was to design a model capable of producing simulations with realistic breast tissue structure.
METHODS: The methodology for generating an ensemble of digital breast phantoms was based on imaging surgical mastectomy specimens using a benchtop, cone-beam computed tomography system. This approach allowed low-noise, high-resolution projection views of the mastectomy specimens at each angular position. Reconstructions of these projection sets were processed using correction techniques and diffusion filtering prior to segmentation into breast tissue types in order to generate phantoms.
RESULTS: Eight compressed digital phantoms and 20 uncompressed phantoms from which an additional 96 pseudocompressed digital phantoms with voxel dimensions of 0.2 mm(3) were generated. Two distinct tissue classification models were used in forming breast phantoms. The binary model classified each tissue voxel as either adipose or fibroglandular. A multivalue scaled model classified each tissue voxel as percentage of adipose tissue (range 1%-99%). Power spectral analysis was performed to compare simulated reconstructions using the breast phantoms to the original breast specimen reconstruction, and fits were observed to be similar.
CONCLUSIONS: The digital breast phantoms developed herein provide a high-resolution anthropomorphic model of the 3D uncompressed and compressed breast that are suitable for use in evaluating and optimizing tomographic breast imaging modalities. The authors believe that other research groups might find the phantoms useful, and therefore they offer to make them available for wider use.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23556909      PMCID: PMC3625242          DOI: 10.1118/1.4795758

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  37 in total

1.  3D cone-beam CT reconstruction for circular trajectories.

Authors:  M Grass; T Köhler; R Proksa
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 3.609

2.  Microcalcification detection using cone-beam CT mammography with a flat-panel imager.

Authors:  Xing Gong; Aruna A Vedula; Stephen J Glick
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2004-06-07       Impact factor: 3.609

3.  The cone-beam algorithm of Feldkamp, Davis, and Kress preserves oblique line integrals.

Authors:  Thomas Rodet; Frédéric Noo; Michel Defrise
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 4.071

4.  Estimation of optimal PDE-based denoising in the SNR sense.

Authors:  Guy Gilboa; Nir Sochen; Yehoshua Y Zeevi
Journal:  IEEE Trans Image Process       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 10.856

5.  A high-resolution voxel phantom of the breast for dose calculations in mammography.

Authors:  Christoph Hoeschen; Ute Fill; Maria Zankl; Werner Panzer; Dieter Regulla; Wilfried Döhring
Journal:  Radiat Prot Dosimetry       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 0.972

6.  Methodology for generating a 3D computerized breast phantom from empirical data.

Authors:  Christina M Li; W Paul Segars; Georgia D Tourassi; John M Boone; James T Dobbins
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 4.071

7.  A spatial-frequency dependent quantum accounting diagram and detective quantum efficiency model of signal and noise propagation in cascaded imaging systems.

Authors:  I A Cunningham; M S Westmore; A Fenster
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  1994-03       Impact factor: 4.071

8.  Artifacts in CT: recognition and avoidance.

Authors:  Julia F Barrett; Nicholas Keat
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  2004 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 5.333

9.  Human observer detection experiments with mammograms and power-law noise.

Authors:  A E Burgess; F L Jacobson; P F Judy
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 4.071

10.  Computer-aided diagnosis of mammographic microcalcification clusters.

Authors:  Maria Kallergi
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 4.071

View more
  11 in total

1.  A general method for cupping artifact correction of cone-beam breast computed tomography images.

Authors:  Xiaolei Qu; Chao-Jen Lai; Yuncheng Zhong; Ying Yi; Chris C Shaw
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2015-10-29       Impact factor: 2.924

2.  Population of 224 realistic human subject-based computational breast phantoms.

Authors:  David W Erickson; Jered R Wells; Gregory M Sturgeon; Ehsan Samei; James T Dobbins; W Paul Segars; Joseph Y Lo
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  Anthropomorphic dual-lattice voxel models for optimizing image quality and dose.

Authors:  Nina Petoussi-Henss; Helmut Schlattl; Janine Becker; Matthias Greiter; Maria Zankl; Christoph Hoeschen
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2017-03-30

4.  The compressed breast during mammography and breast tomosynthesis: in vivo shape characterization and modeling.

Authors:  Alejandro Rodríguez-Ruiz; Greeshma A Agasthya; Ioannis Sechopoulos
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2017-08-07       Impact factor: 3.609

5.  Improvements of an objective model of compressed breasts undergoing mammography: Generation and characterization of breast shapes.

Authors:  Alejandro Rodríguez-Ruiz; Steve Si Jia Feng; Jan van Zelst; Suzan Vreemann; Jessica Rice Mann; Carl Joseph D'Orsi; Ioannis Sechopoulos
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2017-04-25       Impact factor: 4.071

6.  Investigation of energy weighting using an energy discriminating photon counting detector for breast CT.

Authors:  Kesava S Kalluri; Mufeed Mahd; Stephen J Glick
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 4.071

7.  Validation of a power-law noise model for simulating small-scale breast tissue.

Authors:  I Reiser; A Edwards; R M Nishikawa
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2013-08-12       Impact factor: 3.609

Review 8.  Virtual clinical trials in medical imaging: a review.

Authors:  Ehsan Abadi; William P Segars; Benjamin M W Tsui; Paul E Kinahan; Nick Bottenus; Alejandro F Frangi; Andrew Maidment; Joseph Lo; Ehsan Samei
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2020-04-11

9.  Shading artifact correction in breast CT using an interleaved deep learning segmentation and maximum-likelihood polynomial fitting approach.

Authors:  Peymon Ghazi; Andrew M Hernandez; Craig Abbey; Kai Yang; John M Boone
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2019-06-23       Impact factor: 4.071

10.  Three-layer heterogeneous mammographic phantoms for Monte Carlo simulation of normalized glandular dose coefficients in mammography.

Authors:  Tien-Yu Chang; Kuan-Jen Lai; Chun-Yuan Tu; Jay Wu
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-02-10       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.