Literature DB >> 19659596

Sex-specific genetic variance and the evolution of sexual dimorphism: a systematic review of cross-sex genetic correlations.

Jocelyn Poissant1, Alastair J Wilson, David W Coltman.   

Abstract

The independent evolution of the sexes may often be constrained if male and female homologous traits share a similar genetic architecture. Thus, cross-sex genetic covariance is assumed to play a key role in the evolution of sexual dimorphism (SD) with consequent impacts on sexual selection, population dynamics, and speciation processes. We compiled cross-sex genetic correlations (r(MF)) estimates from 114 sources to assess the extent to which the evolution of SD is typically constrained and test several specific hypotheses. First, we tested if r(MF) differed among trait types and especially between fitness components and other traits. We also tested the theoretical prediction of a negative relationship between r(MF) and SD based on the expectation that increases in SD should be facilitated by sex-specific genetic variance. We show that r(MF) is usually large and positive but that it is typically smaller for fitness components. This demonstrates that the evolution of SD is typically genetically constrained and that sex-specific selection coefficients may often be opposite in sign due to sub-optimal levels of SD. Most importantly, we confirm that sex-specific genetic variance is an important contributor to the evolution of SD by validating the prediction of a negative correlation between r(MF) and SD.

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19659596     DOI: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2009.00793.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Evolution        ISSN: 0014-3820            Impact factor:   3.694


  86 in total

1.  Genetic linkage map of a wild genome: genomic structure, recombination and sexual dimorphism in bighorn sheep.

Authors:  Jocelyn Poissant; John T Hogg; Corey S Davis; Joshua M Miller; Jillian F Maddox; David W Coltman
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2010-09-28       Impact factor: 3.969

2.  Male-limited evolution suggests no extant intralocus sexual conflict over the sexually dimorphic cuticular hydrocarbons of Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Stéphanie Bedhomme; Adam K Chippindale; N G Prasad; Matthieu Delcourt; Jessica K Abbott; Martin A Mallet; Howard D Rundle
Journal:  J Genet       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 1.166

3.  Genetic basis of sexual dimorphism in the threespine stickleback Gasterosteus aculeatus.

Authors:  T Leinonen; J M Cano; J Merilä
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2010-08-11       Impact factor: 3.821

4.  Heritability and genetic correlation between the sexes in a songbird sexual ornament.

Authors:  J Potti; D Canal
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2010-11-17       Impact factor: 3.821

5.  Contrasting effects of intralocus sexual conflict on sexually antagonistic coevolution.

Authors:  Tanya M Pennell; Freek J H de Haas; Edward H Morrow; G Sander van Doorn
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-01-11       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  The effects of life history and sexual selection on male and female plumage colouration.

Authors:  James Dale; Cody J Dey; Kaspar Delhey; Bart Kempenaers; Mihai Valcu
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2015-11-04       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  Sex linkage, sex-specific selection, and the role of recombination in the evolution of sexually dimorphic gene expression.

Authors:  Tim Connallon; Andrew G Clark
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2010-11-03       Impact factor: 3.694

8.  Evolutionary inevitability of sexual antagonism.

Authors:  Tim Connallon; Andrew G Clark
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2013-12-11       Impact factor: 5.349

9.  Comparing the intersex genetic correlation for fitness across novel environments in the fruit fly, Drosophila serrata.

Authors:  D Punzalan; M Delcourt; H D Rundle
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2013-09-18       Impact factor: 3.821

10.  A developmental perspective on the evolution of sexual size dimorphism of a moth.

Authors:  R Craig Stillwell; Goggy Davidowitz
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2010-03-10       Impact factor: 5.349

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.