Literature DB >> 22227931

Male-limited evolution suggests no extant intralocus sexual conflict over the sexually dimorphic cuticular hydrocarbons of Drosophila melanogaster.

Stéphanie Bedhomme1, Adam K Chippindale, N G Prasad, Matthieu Delcourt, Jessica K Abbott, Martin A Mallet, Howard D Rundle.   

Abstract

Sexually dimorphic traits are likely to have evolved through sexually antagonistic selection. However, recent empirical data suggest that intralocus sexual conflict often persists, even when traits have diverged between males and females. This implies that evolved dimorphism is often incomplete in resolving intralocus conflict, providing a mechanism for the maintenance of genetic variance in fitness-related traits. We used experimental evolution in Drosophila melanogaster to directly test for ongoing conflict over a suite of sexually dimorphic cuticular hydrocarbons (CHCs) that are likely targets of sex-specific selection. Using a set of experimental populations in which the transmission of genetic material had been restricted to males for 82 generations, we show that CHCs did not evolve, providing experimental evidence for the absence of current intralocus sexual conflict over these traits. The absence of ongoing conflict could indicate that CHCs have never been the target of sexually antagonistic selection, although this would require the existing dimorphism to have evolved via completely sexlinked mutations or as a result of former, but now absent, pleiotropic effects of the underlying loci on another trait under sexually antagonistic selection. An alternative interpretation, and which we believe to be more likely, is that the extensive CHC sexual dimorphism is the result of past intralocus sexual conflict that has been fully resolved, implying that these traits have evolved genetic independence between the sexes and that genetic variation in them is therefore maintained by alternative mechanisms. This latter interpretation is consistent with the known roles of CHCs in sexual communication in this species and with previous studies suggesting the genetic independence of CHCs between males and females. Nevertheless, direct estimates of sexually antagonistic selection will be important to fully resolve these alternatives.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22227931     DOI: 10.1007/s12041-011-0109-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Genet        ISSN: 0022-1333            Impact factor:   1.166


  41 in total

1.  Sexual conflict in wing size and shape in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  J K Abbott; S Bedhomme; A K Chippindale
Journal:  J Evol Biol       Date:  2010-07-31       Impact factor: 2.411

2.  Genetic constraints and the evolution of display trait sexual dimorphism by natural and sexual selection.

Authors:  Stephen F Chenoweth; Howard D Rundle; Mark W Blows
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 3.926

3.  Intralocus sexual conflict over immune defense, gender load, and sex-specific signaling in a natural lizard population.

Authors:  Erik I Svensson; Andrew G McAdam; Barry Sinervo
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2009-07-16       Impact factor: 3.694

4.  Male fitness increases when females are eliminated from gene pool: implications for the Y chromosome.

Authors:  W R Rice
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1998-05-26       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Genetics of a pheromonal difference contributing to reproductive isolation in Drosophila.

Authors:  J A Coyne; A P Crittenden; K Mah
Journal:  Science       Date:  1994-09-02       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  Role of Enhancer of zeste on the production of Drosophila melanogaster pheromonal hydrocarbons.

Authors:  C Wicker-Thomas; J Jallon
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  2000-02

7.  Natural selection and the reinforcement of mate recognition.

Authors:  M Higgie; S Chenoweth; M W Blows
Journal:  Science       Date:  2000-10-20       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  Levels of mate recognition within and between two Drosophila species and their hybrids.

Authors:  M W Blows; R A Allan
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 3.926

9.  Physiological mechanisms of evolved desiccation resistance in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  A G Gibbs; A K Chippindale; M R Rose
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 3.312

10.  Divergent selection and the evolution of signal traits and mating preferences.

Authors:  Howard D Rundle; Stephen F Chenoweth; Paul Doughty; Mark W Blows
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2005-10-25       Impact factor: 8.029

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Sex-biased gene expression and sexual conflict throughout development.

Authors:  Fiona C Ingleby; Ilona Flis; Edward H Morrow
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol       Date:  2014-11-06       Impact factor: 10.005

2.  Reproductive character displacement of epicuticular compounds and their contribution to mate choice in Drosophila subquinaria and Drosophila recens.

Authors:  Kelly A Dyer; Brooke E White; Jacqueline L Sztepanacz; Emily R Bewick; Howard D Rundle
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2014-01-30       Impact factor: 3.694

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.