Literature DB >> 20219738

A developmental perspective on the evolution of sexual size dimorphism of a moth.

R Craig Stillwell1, Goggy Davidowitz.   

Abstract

Males and females of almost all organisms exhibit sexual differences in body size, a phenomenon called sexual size dimorphism (SSD). How the sexes evolve to be different sizes, despite sharing the same genes that control growth and development, and hence a common genetic architecture, has remained elusive. Here, we show that the genetic architecture (heritabilities and genetic correlations) of the physiological mechanism that regulates size during the last stage of larval development of a moth, differs between the sexes, and thus probably facilitates, rather than hinders, the evolution of SSD. We further show that the endocrine system plays a critical role in generating SSD. Our results demonstrate that knowledge of the genetic architecture underlying the physiological process during development that ultimately produces SSD in adults can elucidate how males and females of organisms evolve to be of different sizes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20219738      PMCID: PMC2880092          DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2009.2277

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8452            Impact factor:   5.349


  17 in total

1.  Genetic constraints on floral evolution in a sexually dimorphic plant revealed by artificial selection.

Authors:  Lynda F Delph; Janet L Gehring; Frank M Frey; A Michele Arntz; Maureen Levri
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 3.694

2.  A comparison of methods to estimate cross-environment genetic correlations.

Authors:  P A Astles; A J Moore; R F Preziosi
Journal:  J Evol Biol       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 2.411

Review 3.  The quantitative genetics of sexual dimorphism: assessing the importance of sex-linkage.

Authors:  D J Fairbairn; D A Roff
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2006-08-30       Impact factor: 3.821

Review 4.  Size and shape: the developmental regulation of static allometry in insects.

Authors:  Alexander W Shingleton; W Anthony Frankino; Thomas Flatt; H Frederik Nijhout; Douglas J Emlen
Journal:  Bioessays       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 4.345

5.  Conflicting processes in the evolution of body size and development time.

Authors:  H Frederik Nijhout; Derek A Roff; Goggy Davidowitz
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2010-02-27       Impact factor: 6.237

6.  Developmental model of static allometry in holometabolous insects.

Authors:  Alexander W Shingleton; Christen K Mirth; Peter W Bates
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2008-08-22       Impact factor: 5.349

7.  Critical weight in the development of insect body size.

Authors:  Goggy Davidowitz; Louis J D'Amico; H Frederik Nijhout
Journal:  Evol Dev       Date:  2003 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.930

Review 8.  Size assessment and growth control: how adult size is determined in insects.

Authors:  Christen Kerry Mirth; Lynn M Riddiford
Journal:  Bioessays       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 4.345

9.  The developmental and physiological basis of body size evolution in an insect.

Authors:  L J D'Amico; G Davidowitz; H F Nijhout
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2001-08-07       Impact factor: 5.349

10.  A quantitative analysis of the mechanism that controls body size in Manduca sexta.

Authors:  H F Nijhout; G Davidowitz; D A Roff
Journal:  J Biol       Date:  2006
View more
  10 in total

1.  Sex differences in phenotypic plasticity of a mechanism that controls body size: implications for sexual size dimorphism.

Authors:  R Craig Stillwell; Goggy Davidowitz
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2010-07-07       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Sex-dependent expression of behavioural genetic architectures and the evolution of sexual dimorphism.

Authors:  Chang S Han; Niels J Dingemanse
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2017-10-11       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Caterpillars lack a resident gut microbiome.

Authors:  Tobin J Hammer; Daniel H Janzen; Winnie Hallwachs; Samuel P Jaffe; Noah Fierer
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-08-22       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  The ontogeny of sexual size dimorphism of a moth: when do males and females grow apart?

Authors:  R Craig Stillwell; Andrew Daws; Goggy Davidowitz
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-09-03       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Hidden complexity in the ontogeny of sexual size dimorphism in male-larger beetles.

Authors:  Tomáš Vendl; Petr Šípek; Ondřej Kouklík; Lukáš Kratochvíl
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-04-12       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Field evidence challenges the often-presumed relationship between early male maturation and female-biased sexual size dimorphism.

Authors:  Marie-Claire Chelini; Eileen Hebets
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2017-10-16       Impact factor: 2.912

7.  Modest sexual size dimorphism and allometric growth: a study based on growth and gonad development in the wolf spider Pardosa pseudoannulata (Araneae: Lycosidae).

Authors:  Fan Zhang; Xiaoqiong Chen; Chi Zeng; Lelei Wen; Yao Zhao; Yu Peng
Journal:  Biol Open       Date:  2021-12-10       Impact factor: 2.422

8.  Sex-specific weight loss mediates sexual size dimorphism in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Nicholas D Testa; Shampa M Ghosh; Alexander W Shingleton
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-03-28       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Caterpillars selected for large body size and short development time are more susceptible to oxygen-related stress.

Authors:  Jon F Harrison; Arianne J Cease; John M Vandenbrooks; Todd Albert; Goggy Davidowitz
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2013-04-08       Impact factor: 2.912

10.  Geometric morphometrics reveals sex-differential shape allometry in a spider.

Authors:  Carmen Fernández-Montraveta; Jesús Marugán-Lobón
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2017-07-26       Impact factor: 2.984

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.