Literature DB >> 24045292

Comparing the intersex genetic correlation for fitness across novel environments in the fruit fly, Drosophila serrata.

D Punzalan1, M Delcourt1, H D Rundle1.   

Abstract

Sexually antagonistic genetic variation can pose limits to the independent evolution and adaptation of the sexes. The extent of sexually antagonistic variation is reflected in the intersex genetic correlation for fitness (rw(FM)). Previous estimates of this correlation have been mostly limited to populations in environments to which they are already well adapted, making it difficult to gauge the importance of sexually antagonistic genetic variance during the early stages of adaptation, such as that occurring following abrupt environmental change or upon the colonization of new habitat. Here we assayed male and female lifetime fitness in a population of Drosophila serrata in four novel laboratory environments. We found that rw(FM) varied significantly across environments, with point estimates ranging from positive to negative values of considerable magnitude. We also found that the variability among estimates was because, at least in part, of significant differences among environments in the genetic variances of both male and female fitness, with no evidence of any significant changes in the intersex covariance itself, although standard errors of these estimates were large. Our results illustrate the unpredictable nature of rw(FM) in novel environments and suggest that, although sexually antagonistic genetic variance can be pronounced in some novel environments, it may have little effect in constraining the early stages of adaptation in others.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24045292      PMCID: PMC3907099          DOI: 10.1038/hdy.2013.85

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)        ISSN: 0018-067X            Impact factor:   3.821


  31 in total

1.  Environmental stress, inbreeding, and the nature of phenotypic and genetic variance in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Kevin Fowler; Michael C Whitlock
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2002-04-07       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Heritable variation and evolution under favourable and unfavourable conditions.

Authors: 
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 17.712

3.  Female mating bias results in conflicting sex-specific offspring fitness.

Authors:  Kenneth M Fedorka; Timothy A Mousseau
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2004-05-06       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 4.  Estimating genetic parameters in natural populations using the "animal model".

Authors:  Loeske E B Kruuk
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2004-06-29       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 5.  Genetic correlations, tradeoffs and environmental variation.

Authors:  C M Sgrò; A A Hoffmann
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 3.821

6.  Direct estimation of genetic principal components: simplified analysis of complex phenotypes.

Authors:  Mark Kirkpatrick; Karin Meyer
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 7.  Environmental quality and evolutionary potential: lessons from wild populations.

Authors:  Anne Charmantier; Dany Garant
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2005-07-22       Impact factor: 5.349

8.  High-quality male field crickets invest heavily in sexual display but die young.

Authors:  John Hunt; Robert Brooks; Michael D Jennions; Michael J Smith; Caroline L Bentsen; Luc F Bussière
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2004-12-23       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  Negative genetic correlation for adult fitness between sexes reveals ontogenetic conflict in Drosophila.

Authors:  A K Chippindale; J R Gibson; W R Rice
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-01-30       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Divergent selection and the evolution of signal traits and mating preferences.

Authors:  Howard D Rundle; Stephen F Chenoweth; Paul Doughty; Mark W Blows
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2005-10-25       Impact factor: 8.029

View more
  19 in total

1.  The effect of parasites on sex differences in selection.

Authors:  N P Sharp; C M Vincent
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2015-02-04       Impact factor: 3.821

2.  Quantifying maladaptation during the evolution of sexual dimorphism.

Authors:  Genevieve Matthews; Sandra Hangartner; David G Chapple; Tim Connallon
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2019-08-14       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 3.  Linking local adaptation with the evolution of sex differences.

Authors:  Tim Connallon; Florence Débarre; Xiang-Yi Li
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2018-10-05       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 4.  Sex differences in local adaptation: what can we learn from reciprocal transplant experiments?

Authors:  Erik I Svensson; Debora Goedert; Miguel A Gómez-Llano; Foteini Spagopoulou; Angela Nava-Bolaños; Isobel Booksmythe
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2018-10-05       Impact factor: 6.237

5.  Climatic factors and species range position predict sexually antagonistic selection across taxa.

Authors:  Stephen P De Lisle; Debora Goedert; Aaron M Reedy; Erik I Svensson
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2018-10-05       Impact factor: 6.237

6.  Balancing selection in species with separate sexes: insights from Fisher's geometric model.

Authors:  Tim Connallon; Andrew G Clark
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2014-05-08       Impact factor: 4.562

7.  Sex-dependent expression of behavioural genetic architectures and the evolution of sexual dimorphism.

Authors:  Chang S Han; Niels J Dingemanse
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2017-10-11       Impact factor: 5.349

8.  Environmental Plasticity in the Intersexual Correlation and Sex Bias of Gene Expression.

Authors:  Changde Cheng; Mark Kirkpatrick
Journal:  J Hered       Date:  2017-10-30       Impact factor: 2.645

9.  Is the X chromosome a hot spot for sexually antagonistic polymorphisms? Biases in current empirical tests of classical theory.

Authors:  Filip Ruzicka; Tim Connallon
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2020-10-21       Impact factor: 5.349

10.  Inbreeding alters intersexual fitness correlations in Drosophila simulans.

Authors:  Eoin Duffy; Richa Joag; Jacek Radwan; Nina Wedell; David J Hosken
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2014-08-05       Impact factor: 2.912

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.