Literature DB >> 26536112

The effects of life history and sexual selection on male and female plumage colouration.

James Dale1, Cody J Dey2, Kaspar Delhey3,4, Bart Kempenaers5, Mihai Valcu5.   

Abstract

Classical sexual selection theory provides a well-supported conceptual framework for understanding the evolution and signalling function of male ornaments. It predicts that males obtain greater fitness benefits than females through multiple mating because sperm are cheaper to produce than eggs. Sexual selection should therefore lead to the evolution of male-biased secondary sexual characters. However, females of many species are also highly ornamented. The view that this is due to a correlated genetic response to selection on males was widely accepted as an explanation for female ornamentation for over 100 years and current theoretical and empirical evidence suggests that genetic constraints can limit sex-specific trait evolution. Alternatively, female ornamentation can be the outcome of direct selection for signalling needs. Since few studies have explored interspecific patterns of both male and female elaboration, our understanding of the evolution of animal ornamentation remains incomplete, especially over broad taxonomic scales. Here we use a new method to quantify plumage colour of all ~6,000 species of passerine birds to determine the main evolutionary drivers of ornamental colouration in both sexes. We found that conspecific male and female colour elaboration are strongly correlated, suggesting that evolutionary changes in one sex are constrained by changes in the other sex. Both sexes are more ornamented in larger species and in species living in tropical environments. Ornamentation in females (but not males) is increased in cooperative breeders--species in which female-female competition for reproductive opportunities and other resources related to breeding may be high. Finally, strong sexual selection on males has antagonistic effects, causing an increase in male colouration but a considerably more pronounced reduction in female ornamentation. Our results indicate that although there may be genetic constraints to sexually independent colour evolution, both female and male ornamentation are strongly and often differentially related to morphological, social and life-history variables.

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26536112     DOI: 10.1038/nature15509

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nature        ISSN: 0028-0836            Impact factor:   49.962


  37 in total

1.  Using the Past to Predict the Present: Confidence Intervals for Regression Equations in Phylogenetic Comparative Methods.

Authors:  Theodore Garland; Anthony R Ives
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 3.926

2.  Why are female birds ornamented?

Authors: 
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 17.712

3.  Heritability and genetic correlation between the sexes in a songbird sexual ornament.

Authors:  J Potti; D Canal
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2010-11-17       Impact factor: 3.821

4.  Prevalence of different modes of parental care in birds.

Authors:  Andrew Cockburn
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2006-06-07       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 5.  Sex-specific genetic variance and the evolution of sexual dimorphism: a systematic review of cross-sex genetic correlations.

Authors:  Jocelyn Poissant; Alastair J Wilson; David W Coltman
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2009-07-30       Impact factor: 3.694

6.  Migration and the evolution of sexual dichromatism: evolutionary loss of female coloration with migration among wood-warblers.

Authors:  Richard K Simpson; Michele A Johnson; Troy G Murphy
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2015-06-22       Impact factor: 5.349

7.  Reconstructing the evolution of sexual dichromatism: current color diversity does not reflect past rates of male and female change.

Authors:  J Jordan Price; Muir D Eaton
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2014-05-06       Impact factor: 3.694

Review 8.  Insights from comparative analyses of aging in birds and mammals.

Authors:  Robert E Ricklefs
Journal:  Aging Cell       Date:  2009-12-23       Impact factor: 9.304

9.  Sexual selection explains Rensch's rule of allometry for sexual size dimorphism.

Authors:  James Dale; Peter O Dunn; Jordi Figuerola; Terje Lislevand; Tamás Székely; Linda A Whittingham
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2007-12-07       Impact factor: 5.349

10.  Different modes of evolution in males and females generate dichromatism in fairy-wrens (Maluridae).

Authors:  Allison E Johnson; J Jordan Price; Stephen Pruett-Jones
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2013-08-01       Impact factor: 2.912

View more
  69 in total

Review 1.  Species variation in the degree of sex differences in brain and behaviour related to birdsong: adaptations and constraints.

Authors:  Gregory F Ball
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2016-02-01       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 2.  Multifaceted origins of sex differences in the brain.

Authors:  Margaret M McCarthy
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2016-02-01       Impact factor: 6.237

3.  Coevolution influences the evolution of filial cannibalism, offspring abandonment and parental care.

Authors:  Hope Klug; Michael B Bonsall
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2019-08-21       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Integrating behaviour and ecology into global biodiversity conservation strategies.

Authors:  Joseph A Tobias; Alex L Pigot
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2019-07-29       Impact factor: 6.237

5.  New insights from female bird song: towards an integrated approach to studying male and female communication roles.

Authors:  Katharina Riebel; Karan J Odom; Naomi E Langmore; Michelle L Hall
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2019-04-26       Impact factor: 3.703

6.  Conspicuous plumage colours are highly variable.

Authors:  Kaspar Delhey; Beatrice Szecsenyi; Shinichi Nakagawa; Anne Peters
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2017-01-25       Impact factor: 5.349

7.  Bright birds are cautious: seasonally conspicuous plumage prompts risk avoidance by male superb fairy-wrens.

Authors:  Alexandra McQueen; Annalise C Naimo; Niki Teunissen; Robert D Magrath; Kaspar Delhey; Anne Peters
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2017-06-28       Impact factor: 5.349

8.  Open cup nests evolved from roofed nests in the early passerines.

Authors:  J Jordan Price; Simon C Griffith
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2017-02-08       Impact factor: 5.349

9.  Multi-modal signal evolution in birds: re-examining a standard proxy for sexual selection.

Authors:  Christopher R Cooney; Hannah E A MacGregor; Nathalie Seddon; Joseph A Tobias
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2018-10-17       Impact factor: 5.349

10.  Beyond colour: consistent variation in near infrared and solar reflectivity in sunbirds (Nectariniidae).

Authors:  Matthew D Shawkey; Branislav Igic; Svana Rogalla; Jonathan Goldenberg; Susana Clusella-Trullas; Liliana D'Alba
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  2017-09-04
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.