Literature DB >> 19648452

The influence of only and even on online semantic interpretation.

Ruth Filik1, Kevin B Paterson, Simon P Liversedge.   

Abstract

Focus particles such as only and even indicate that the focused element(s) in a sentence should be contrasted with a set of contextually defined alternatives. Only indicates that properties assigned to the focus set are not shared by elements of the alternative set, whereas even indicates that the focus and alternative sets share the properties mentioned in the sentence. Even has the additional function of marking the focused element as being low on a scale of alternatives ranked in terms of likelihood, thereby signaling that what is being described is somewhat surprising. Using eyetracking, we demonstrate that contrast information associated with only and even is rapidly processed online, with effects for even being delayed, as compared with only (Experiment 1). This difference in time course was not driven by the underlying semantics of the sentence without the focus particle (Experiment 2) but was probably due to even's more complex semantic function.

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19648452     DOI: 10.3758/PBR.16.4.678

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev        ISSN: 1069-9384


  9 in total

1.  The influence of only on syntactic processing of "long" relative clause sentences.

Authors:  Simon P Liversedge; Kevin B Paterson; Emma L Clayes
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol A       Date:  2002-01

2.  The effect of plausibility on eye movements in reading.

Authors:  Keith Rayner; Tessa Warren; Barbara J Juhasz; Simon P Liversedge
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 3.051

3.  The time course of plausibility effects on eye movements in reading: evidence from noun-noun compounds.

Authors:  Adrian Staub; Keith Rayner; Alexander Pollatsek; Jukka Hyönä; Helen Majewski
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 3.051

4.  Investigating effects of selectional restriction violations and plausibility violation severity on eye-movements in reading.

Authors:  Tessa Warren; Kerry McConnell
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2007-08

5.  Contextual override of pragmatic anomalies: evidence from eye movements.

Authors:  Ruth Filik
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2007-05-23

6.  Lexical complexity and fixation times in reading: effects of word frequency, verb complexity, and lexical ambiguity.

Authors:  K Rayner; S A Duffy
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1986-05

7.  Children's comprehension of sentences with focus particles.

Authors:  Kevin B Paterson; Simon P Liversedge; Caroline Rowland; Ruth Filik
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2003-10

8.  Anomaly detection: eye movement patterns.

Authors:  W Ni; J D Fodor; S Crain; D Shankweiler
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  1998-09

9.  Focus identification during sentence comprehension: evidence from eye movements.

Authors:  Kevin B Paterson; Simon P Liversedge; Ruth Filik; Barbara J Juhasz; Sarah J White; Keith Rayner
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 2.143

  9 in total
  4 in total

1.  Situational context affects definiteness preferences: accommodation of presuppositions.

Authors:  Charles Clifton
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2012-06-25       Impact factor: 3.051

2.  Stage Salience and Situational Likelihood in the Formation of Situation Models during Sentence Comprehension.

Authors:  David J Townsend
Journal:  Lingua       Date:  2018-02-17

3.  Focus, newness and their combination: processing of information structure in discourse.

Authors:  Lijing Chen; Xingshan Li; Yufang Yang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-08-17       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Eye Movements Reveal Delayed Use of Construction-Based Pragmatic Information During Online Sentence Reading: A Case of Chinese Liandou Construction.

Authors:  Chuanli Zang; Li Zhang; Manman Zhang; Xuejun Bai; Guoli Yan; Xiaoming Jiang; Zhewen He; Xiaolin Zhou
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2019-10-30
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.