Literature DB >> 17983320

The time course of plausibility effects on eye movements in reading: evidence from noun-noun compounds.

Adrian Staub1, Keith Rayner, Alexander Pollatsek, Jukka Hyönä, Helen Majewski.   

Abstract

Readers' eye movements were monitored as they read sentences containing noun-noun compounds that varied in frequency (e.g., elevator mechanic, mountain lion). The left constituent of the compound was either plausible or implausible as a head noun at the point at which it appeared, whereas the compound as a whole was always plausible. When the head noun analysis of the left constituent was implausible, reading times on this word were inflated, beginning with the first fixation. This finding is consistent with previous demonstrations of very rapid effects of plausibility on eye movements. Compound frequency did not modulate the plausibility effect, and all disruption was resolved by the time readers' eyes moved to the next word. These findings suggest (contra Kennison, 2005) that the parser initially analyzes a singular noun as a head instead of a modifier. In addition, the findings confirm that the very rapid effect of plausibility on eye movements is not due to strategic factors, because in the present experiment, unlike in previous demonstrations, this effect appeared in sentences that were globally plausible. PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2007 APA, all rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17983320     DOI: 10.1037/0278-7393.33.6.1162

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn        ISSN: 0278-7393            Impact factor:   3.051


  16 in total

1.  Event-based plausibility immediately influences on-line language comprehension.

Authors:  Kazunaga Matsuki; Tracy Chow; Mary Hare; Jeffrey L Elman; Christoph Scheepers; Ken McRae
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 3.051

2.  The influence of only and even on online semantic interpretation.

Authors:  Ruth Filik; Kevin B Paterson; Simon P Liversedge
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2009-08

3.  Validating presupposed versus focused text information.

Authors:  Murray Singer; Kevin G Solar; Jackie Spear
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2017-04

4.  Distinguishing the time course of lexical and discourse processes through context, coreference, and quantified expressions.

Authors:  Yi Ting Huang; Peter C Gordon
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 3.051

5.  Word segmentation of overlapping ambiguous strings during Chinese reading.

Authors:  Guojie Ma; Xingshan Li; Keith Rayner
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2014-01-13       Impact factor: 3.332

6.  Plausibility effects when reading one- and two-character words in Chinese: evidence from eye movements.

Authors:  Jinmian Yang; Adrian Staub; Nan Li; Suiping Wang; Keith Rayner
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2012-05-21       Impact factor: 3.051

7.  When experience meets language statistics: Individual variability in processing English compound words.

Authors:  Kaitlin Falkauskas; Victor Kuperman
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2015-06-15       Impact factor: 3.051

8.  Cue strength in second-language processing: an eye-tracking study.

Authors:  Alba Tuninetti; Tessa Warren; Natasha Tokowicz
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)       Date:  2014-11-07       Impact factor: 2.143

9.  The word grouping hypothesis and eye movements during reading.

Authors:  Denis Drieghe; Alexander Pollatsek; Adrian Staub; Keith Rayner
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 3.051

10.  The recruitment of knowledge regarding plurality and compound formation during language comprehension.

Authors:  Robert Fiorentino; Jamie Bost; Alyson D Abel; Jordan Zuccarelli
Journal:  Ment Lex       Date:  2012-01-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.