Literature DB >> 30166690

Stage Salience and Situational Likelihood in the Formation of Situation Models during Sentence Comprehension.

David J Townsend1.   

Abstract

Two experiments examined the relation between event structure, situational likelihood and eye fixation time while reading predicate modifiers in isolated sentences. Experiment 1 used activity predicates and preparatory process predicates (climbed a mountain), which make salient the process that leads to a culmination. Preparatory process predicates increased first pass time on durative modifiers (for several years) and decreased total time on frequency modifiers (e.g., every year). Situational likelihood was associated with fixation times on frame modifiers (last year) but not with fixation times on durative or frequency modifiers. Experiment 2 used activity predicates and result state predicates (halted a class), which make salient the result that follows from a culmination. Result state predicates had no effect on fixation times on durative modifiers and decreased total time on frequency modifiers. Situational likelihood was associated only with total time on durative modifiers. These results demonstrate that readers use the meanings of predicates and modifiers to form an initial model of a sentence and that the likelihood of the reported situation is related to reading time relatively late. The results are discussed in terms of type coercion theory and situation models in sentences and narratives.

Entities:  

Keywords:  event structure; eye movements; sentence processing; situation model; situational likelihood; type coercion theory

Year:  2018        PMID: 30166690      PMCID: PMC6110531          DOI: 10.1016/j.lingua.2018.01.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lingua        ISSN: 0024-3841


  17 in total

1.  Time-course of semantic composition: the case of aspectual coercion.

Authors:  Maria Mercedes Piñango; Aaron Winnick; Rashad Ullah; Edgar Zurif
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  2006-05

2.  Verb aspect and the activation of event knowledge.

Authors:  Todd R Ferretti; Marta Kutas; Ken McRae
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 3.051

3.  The syntax of event structure.

Authors:  J Pustejovsky
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  1991-12

4.  Reading times and the detection of event shift processing.

Authors:  Gabriel A Radvansky; David E Copeland
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 3.051

5.  The influence of only and even on online semantic interpretation.

Authors:  Ruth Filik; Kevin B Paterson; Simon P Liversedge
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2009-08

6.  Processing events: behavioral and neuromagnetic correlates of Aspectual Coercion.

Authors:  Jonathan Brennan; Liina Pylkkänen
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  2008-06-17       Impact factor: 2.381

Review 7.  Situation models in language comprehension and memory.

Authors:  R A Zwaan; G A Radvansky
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 17.737

8.  Verb aspect, event structure, and coreferential processing.

Authors:  Todd R Ferretti; Hannah Rohde; Andrew Kehler; Melanie Crutchley
Journal:  J Mem Lang       Date:  2009-05-12       Impact factor: 3.059

9.  Electrophysiological correlates of complement coercion.

Authors:  Gina R Kuperberg; Arim Choi; Neil Cohn; Martin Paczynski; Ray Jackendoff
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 3.225

10.  When events change their nature: the neurocognitive mechanisms underlying aspectual coercion.

Authors:  Martin Paczynski; Ray Jackendoff; Gina Kuperberg
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2014-04-04       Impact factor: 3.225

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.