Literature DB >> 9750312

Anomaly detection: eye movement patterns.

W Ni1, J D Fodor, S Crain, D Shankweiler.   

Abstract

The symptom of a garden path in sentence processing is an important anomaly in the input string. This anomaly signals to the parser that an error has occurred, and provides cues for how to repair it. Anomaly detection is thus an important aspect of sentence processing. In the present study, we investigated how the parser responds to unambiguous sentences that contain syntactic anomalies and pragmatic anomalies, examining records of eye movement during reading. While sensitivity to the two kinds of anomaly was very rapid and essentially simultaneous, qualitative differences existed in the patterns of first-pass reading times and eye regressions. The results are compatible with the proposal that syntactic information and pragmatic information are used differently in garden-path recovery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9750312     DOI: 10.1023/a:1024996828734

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res        ISSN: 0090-6905


  6 in total

1.  Syntactically based sentence processing classes: evidence from event-related brain potentials.

Authors:  H Neville; J L Nicol; A Barss; K I Forster; M F Garrett
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  The processing nature of the n400: evidence from masked priming.

Authors:  C Brown; P Hagoort
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  Sentence processing and the mental representation of verbs.

Authors:  L P Shapiro; E Zurif; J Grimshaw
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  1987-12

4.  Processing relative clauses varying on syntactic and semantic dimensions: an analysis with event-related potentials.

Authors:  A Mecklinger; H Schriefers; K Steinhauer; A D Friederici
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1995-07

5.  Syntactic parsing as revealed by brain responses: first-pass and second-pass parsing processes.

Authors:  A D Friederici; A Mecklinger
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  1996-01

Review 6.  Tasks and timing in the perception of linguistic anomaly.

Authors:  J D Fodor; W Ni; S Crain; D Shankweiler
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  1996-01
  6 in total
  7 in total

1.  Readers' eye movements distinguish anomalies of form and content.

Authors:  David Braze; Donald Shankweiler; Weijia Ni; Laura Conway Palumbo
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  2002-01

2.  The interplay of discourse congruence and lexical association during sentence processing: Evidence from ERPs and eye tracking.

Authors:  C Christine Camblin; Peter C Gordon; Tamara Y Swaab
Journal:  J Mem Lang       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 3.059

3.  Interference effects from grammatically unavailable constituents during sentence processing.

Authors:  Julie A Van Dyke
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 3.051

4.  The influence of only and even on online semantic interpretation.

Authors:  Ruth Filik; Kevin B Paterson; Simon P Liversedge
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2009-08

5.  Neural basis of semantic and syntactic interference in sentence comprehension.

Authors:  Yi G Glaser; Randi C Martin; Julie A Van Dyke; A Cris Hamilton; Yingying Tan
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  2013-08-07       Impact factor: 2.381

6.  Children's and adults' processing of anomaly and implausibility during reading: evidence from eye movements.

Authors:  Holly S S L Joseph; Simon P Liversedge; Hazel I Blythe; Sarah J White; Susan E Gathercole; Keith Rayner
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)       Date:  2007-07-23       Impact factor: 2.143

7.  Eye Movements Reveal Delayed Use of Construction-Based Pragmatic Information During Online Sentence Reading: A Case of Chinese Liandou Construction.

Authors:  Chuanli Zang; Li Zhang; Manman Zhang; Xuejun Bai; Guoli Yan; Xiaoming Jiang; Zhewen He; Xiaolin Zhou
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2019-10-30
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.