Literature DB >> 22732029

Situational context affects definiteness preferences: accommodation of presuppositions.

Charles Clifton1.   

Abstract

In 4 experiments, we used self-paced reading and eye tracking to demonstrate that readers are, under some conditions, sensitive to the presuppositions of definite versus indefinite determiner phrases (DPs). Reading was faster when the context stereotypically provided a single possible referent for a definite DP or multiple possible referents for an indefinite DP than when context and DP definiteness were mismatched. This finding goes beyond previous evidence that definite DPs are processed more rapidly than are indefinite DPs when there is a unique or familiar referent in the context, showing that readers are sensitive to the semantics and pragmatics of (in)definiteness. However, the finding was obtained only when readers had to perform a simple arithmetic task between reading a sentence and seeing a question about it. The intervening task may have encouraged them to process the sentence more deeply in order to form a representation that would persist while doing the arithmetic. The methodological implications of this observation are discussed. (c) 2013 APA, all rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22732029      PMCID: PMC3893092          DOI: 10.1037/a0028975

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn        ISSN: 0278-7393            Impact factor:   3.051


  9 in total

1.  The effect of plausibility on eye movements in reading.

Authors:  Keith Rayner; Tessa Warren; Barbara J Juhasz; Simon P Liversedge
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 3.051

2.  Inferential bridging relations reveal distinct neural mechanisms: evidence from event-related brain potentials.

Authors:  Petra Burkhardt
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  2006-05-24       Impact factor: 2.381

3.  Underspecification of syntactic ambiguities: evidence from self-paced reading.

Authors:  Benjamin Swets; Timothy Desmet; Charles Clifton; Fernanda Ferreira
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2008-01

4.  The influence of only and even on online semantic interpretation.

Authors:  Ruth Filik; Kevin B Paterson; Simon P Liversedge
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2009-08

Review 5.  Eye movements in reading and information processing: 20 years of research.

Authors:  K Rayner
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 17.737

6.  Ambiguity in sentence processing.

Authors:  G T Altmann
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  1998-04-01       Impact factor: 20.229

7.  Interaction with context during human sentence processing.

Authors:  G Altmann; M Steedman
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  1988-12

8.  Establishing and accessing referents in discourse.

Authors:  G L Murphy
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1984-09

9.  Categorical Data Analysis: Away from ANOVAs (transformation or not) and towards Logit Mixed Models.

Authors:  T Florian Jaeger
Journal:  J Mem Lang       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 3.059

  9 in total
  3 in total

1.  Accommodation to an Unlikely Episodic State.

Authors:  Charles Clifton; Lyn Frazier
Journal:  J Mem Lang       Date:  2016-01-01       Impact factor: 3.059

2.  Predicting Definite and Indefinite Referents During Discourse Comprehension: Evidence from Event-Related Potentials.

Authors:  Georgia-Ann Carter; Mante S Nieuwland
Journal:  Cogn Sci       Date:  2022-02

3.  Presuppositions of determiners are immediately used to disambiguate utterance meaning: A mouse-tracking study on the German language.

Authors:  Cosima Schneider; Nadine Bade; Michael Franke; Markus Janczyk
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2020-04-04
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.