Literature DB >> 2272938

Binaural interaction in a cochlear implant patient.

M Pelizzone1, A Kasper, P Montandon.   

Abstract

Binaural interaction was demonstrated in electrically evoked brainstem responses (EBRs) of a bilaterally implanted patient. A clear binaural difference waveform (BD), consisting of a negative peak near 3.6 ms followed by a positive peak near 4.4 ms, was found by subtracting the recordings with diotic stimulation from the sum of the recordings with monotic stimulation. These results are consistent with those reported for normal subjects and suggest that neural processing in this patient might resemble those ordinarily used in binaural hearing. They strengthen the argument that EBRs in cochlear implant patients do result from activity in auditory brainstem neurons and suggest a method for aligning the positions of the intracochlear electrodes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2272938     DOI: 10.1016/0378-5955(90)90069-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hear Res        ISSN: 0378-5955            Impact factor:   3.208


  12 in total

1.  Using evoked potentials to match interaural electrode pairs with bilateral cochlear implants.

Authors:  Zachary M Smith; Bertrand Delgutte
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2007-01-17

2.  Sensitivity to interaural time difference with bilateral cochlear implants: Development over time and effect of interaural electrode spacing.

Authors:  Becky B Poon; Donald K Eddington; Victor Noel; H Steven Colburn
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 3.  [Bilateral cochlear implants].

Authors:  J Müller
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 1.284

4.  Preliminary results of the relationship between the binaural interaction component of the electrically evoked auditory brainstem response and interaural pitch comparisons in bilateral cochlear implant recipients.

Authors:  Shuman He; Carolyn J Brown; Paul J Abbas
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2012 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.570

5.  Central masking with bilateral cochlear implants.

Authors:  Payton Lin; Thomas Lu; Fan-Gang Zeng
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Between-ear sound frequency disparity modulates a brain stem biomarker of binaural hearing.

Authors:  Andrew D Brown; Kelsey L Anbuhl; Jesse I Gilmer; Daniel J Tollin
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2019-07-17       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Effects of stimulation level and electrode pairing on the binaural interaction component of the electrically evoked auditory brain stem response.

Authors:  Shuman He; Carolyn J Brown; Paul J Abbas
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 3.570

8.  A Comparison of Two Objective Measures of Binaural Processing: The Interaural Phase Modulation Following Response and the Binaural Interaction Component.

Authors:  Nicholas R Haywood; Jaime A Undurraga; Torsten Marquardt; David McAlpine
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2015-12-30       Impact factor: 3.293

9.  Normative Study of the Binaural Interaction Component of the Human Auditory Brainstem Response as a Function of Interaural Time Differences.

Authors:  Carol A Sammeth; Nathaniel T Greene; Andrew D Brown; Daniel J Tollin
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2021 May/Jun       Impact factor: 3.562

10.  Envelope enhancement increases cortical sensitivity to interaural envelope delays with acoustic and electric hearing.

Authors:  Douglas E H Hartley; Amal Isaiah
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-08-05       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.