Literature DB >> 19618186

Tip-apex distance of intramedullary devices as a predictor of cut-out failure in the treatment of peritrochanteric elderly hip fractures.

Jeffrey A Geller1, Comron Saifi, Todd A Morrison, William Macaulay.   

Abstract

A tip-apex distance (TAD) of greater than 25 mm has been shown to be an accurate predictor of lag screw cut-out when sliding hip screws (SHS) are used to treat peritrochanteric (PT) hip fractures. The purpose of this study was to determine which factors, including TAD, correlated with successful clinical outcomes of PT hip fractures surgically treated with intramedullary (IM) devices. A total of 192 patients were included in this retrospective study. The TAD values of this cohort were radiographically analysed at a mean follow-up of 13 months. This was correlated with limited functional status and the rate of revision for implant failure or inability to achieve fracture union. Only 82 patients had adequate follow-up to fracture union or definitive failure. There were 46 intertrochanteric (IT) hip fractures and 36 subtrochanteric (ST) fractures. Overall, seven patients (8.5%) went on to experience lag screw cut-out. The average TAD of the patients who did not cut-out was 18 mm, compared to 38 mm for those who did (p = 0.012). All patients who cut-out had IT fractures (p = 0.017). The percentage of cut-outs correlated directly to both the severity of IT fractures and the TAD. Using a cutoff of 25 mm there was a statistically significant difference in the incidence of lag screw cut-out (p < 0.001). As in sliding hip screws, surgeons should strive for a TAD less than 25 mm when using IM devices in the treatment of PT hip fractures to help avoid lag screw cut-out.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19618186      PMCID: PMC2903170          DOI: 10.1007/s00264-009-0837-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Orthop        ISSN: 0341-2695            Impact factor:   3.075


  18 in total

1.  Intramedullary versus extramedullary fixation for the treatment of intertrochanteric hip fractures.

Authors:  M R Baumgaertner; S L Curtin; D M Lindskog
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Awareness of tip-apex distance reduces failure of fixation of trochanteric fractures of the hip.

Authors:  M R Baumgaertner; B D Solberg
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1997-11

3.  Treatment of reverse oblique and transverse intertrochanteric fractures with use of an intramedullary nail or a 95 degrees screw-plate: a prospective, randomized study.

Authors:  Christophe Sadowski; Anne Lübbeke; Marc Saudan; Nicolas Riand; Richard Stern; Pierre Hoffmeyer
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 5.284

Review 4.  Estimating hip fracture morbidity, mortality and costs.

Authors:  R Scott Braithwaite; Nananda F Col; John B Wong
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 5.562

5.  Treatment of intertrochanteric fracture with the Gamma AP locking nail or by a compression hip screw--a randomised prospective trial.

Authors:  S R Park; J S Kang; H S Kim; W H Lee; Y H Kim
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 3.075

6.  Subtrochanteric fractures of the femur.

Authors:  F Seinsheimer
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1978-04       Impact factor: 5.284

7.  Biomechanical analysis of the Gamma nail and sliding hip screw.

Authors:  N Mahomed; I Harrington; J Kellam; G Maistrelli; T Hearn; J Vroemen
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1994-07       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  Analysis of six hundred and twenty-two intertrochanteric hip fractures.

Authors:  R F Kyle; R B Gustilo; R F Premer
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1979-03       Impact factor: 5.284

9.  The value of the tip-apex distance in predicting failure of fixation of peritrochanteric fractures of the hip.

Authors:  M R Baumgaertner; S L Curtin; D M Lindskog; J M Keggi
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 5.284

10.  The future of hip fractures in the United States. Numbers, costs, and potential effects of postmenopausal estrogen.

Authors:  S R Cummings; S M Rubin; D Black
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1990-03       Impact factor: 4.176

View more
  42 in total

1.  Prospective randomised study comparing screw versus helical blade in the treatment of low-energy trochanteric fractures.

Authors:  Richard Stern; Anne Lübbeke; Domizio Suva; Hermes Miozzari; Pierre Hoffmeyer
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2011-03-10       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  Outcome of treatment of fracture neck of femur using hemiarthroplasty versus dynamic hip screw.

Authors:  Dd Mue; Mn Salihu; F0 Awonusi; Wt Yongu; Jn Kortor; Ic Elachi
Journal:  J West Afr Coll Surg       Date:  2013-04

3.  Is helical blade superior to screw design in terms of cut-out rate for elderly trochanteric fractures? A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Xiao Huang; Frankie Leung; Ming Liu; Long Chen; Zhao Xu; Zhou Xiang
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2014-02-21

Review 4.  [Osteoporotic fractures of the proximal femur. What's new?].

Authors:  F Bonnaire; C Straßberger; M Kieb; P Bula
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 0.955

5.  Clinical outcomes of dynamic hip screw fixation of intertrochanteric fractures: comparison with additional anti-rotation screw use.

Authors:  Chul-Ho Kim; Jae Suk Chang; Ji Wan Kim
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2019-03-07

6.  Predictors of failure following fixation of intertrochanteric fractures with proximal femoral nail antirotation.

Authors:  Raghavan Raghuraman; Jia Wen Kam; David Thai Chong Chua
Journal:  Singapore Med J       Date:  2019-09       Impact factor: 1.858

7.  [Evolution and principles of intramedullary locked nailing].

Authors:  C Hierholzer; J Friederichs; P Augat; A Woltmann; O Trapp; V Bühren; C von Rüden
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2018-03       Impact factor: 1.000

8.  Osteoarthritis is associated with increased failure of proximal femoral fracture fixation.

Authors:  Charles A Gallagher; Christopher W Jones; Lara Kimmel; Christopher Wylde; Anthony Osbrough; Max Bulsara; Kathryn Hird; Piers Yates
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2018-06-20       Impact factor: 3.075

9.  Changes in Tip-Apex Distance by Position and Film Distance Measured by Picture Archiving and Communication System (PACS).

Authors:  Kyu Yeol Lee; Sung Soo Kim; Hyeon Jun Kim; Dong Ho Ha; Hyung Min Yoon; Hyun Su Do
Journal:  Hip Pelvis       Date:  2015-03-31

10.  Risk factors in cutout of sliding hip screw in intertrochanteric fractures: an evaluation of 937 patients.

Authors:  Kuang-Kai Hsueh; Chi-Kuang Fang; Chuan-Mu Chen; Yu-Ping Su; Heng-Fei Wu; Fang-Yao Chiu
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2009-09-26       Impact factor: 3.075

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.