Literature DB >> 19784649

Risk factors in cutout of sliding hip screw in intertrochanteric fractures: an evaluation of 937 patients.

Kuang-Kai Hsueh1, Chi-Kuang Fang, Chuan-Mu Chen, Yu-Ping Su, Heng-Fei Wu, Fang-Yao Chiu.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was designed to assess the risk factors of lag-screw cutout in the treatment of intertrochanteric fracture with a dynamic hip screw (DHS). From 2003 to 2007, 1,150 patients who had acute unilateral intertrochanteric fractures of the femur were enrolled to the study. All fractures were managed by closed reduction and internal fixation with 135° DHS devices. Patient demographics, fracture patterns, reduction and fixation and perioperative course parameters were all recorded. The follow-up period was 38 months on average (range 16-60 months). Finally, 937 patients were available for evaluation of final results in which we focused on lag-screw cutout. Excluding complications not related to screw position, 64 patients (6.8%) with screw cutout were encountered, and the remaining 873 patients had uneventful union, with the average union time of 17.5 weeks (range15-24 weeks). Upon analysis with logistic regression, the tip-apex distance (TAD) was shown to be the most important predictive factor for cutout, followed by screw position, fracture pattern, reduction and patient age. In order to decrease the risk of lag-screw cutout, it is important to ensure good fracture reduction and to place the lag screw in either the middle/middle or inferior/middle position with appropriate TAD.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19784649      PMCID: PMC2989068          DOI: 10.1007/s00264-009-0866-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Orthop        ISSN: 0341-2695            Impact factor:   3.075


  22 in total

1.  A ten-year analysis of intertrochanteric fractures of the femur.

Authors:  M CLEVELAND; D M BOSWORTH; F R THOMPSON; H J WILSON; T ISHIZUKA
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1959-12       Impact factor: 5.284

2.  Trochanteric fractures. Influence of reduction and implant position on impaction and complications.

Authors:  S Larsson; S Friberg; L I Hansson
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1990-10       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Cutting-out of the dynamic hip screw related to its position.

Authors:  M J Parker
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1992-07

4.  A meta-analysis of the Gamma nail and dynamic hip screw in treating peritrochanteric fractures.

Authors:  Ming Liu; Zhiming Yang; Fuxing Pei; Fuguo Huang; Shiqiang Chen; Zhou Xiang
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2009-04-29       Impact factor: 3.075

5.  Stable fixation of intertrochanteric fractures.

Authors:  H Kaufer; L S Matthews; D Sonstegard
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1974-07       Impact factor: 5.284

6.  Implant failures in patients with proximal fractures of the femur treated with a sliding screw device.

Authors:  C C Mainds; R J Newman
Journal:  Injury       Date:  1989-03       Impact factor: 2.586

7.  Prediction of fixation failure after sliding hip screw fixation.

Authors:  Humayon Pervez; Martyn J Parker; Sarah Vowler
Journal:  Injury       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 2.586

8.  Tip-apex distance of intramedullary devices as a predictor of cut-out failure in the treatment of peritrochanteric elderly hip fractures.

Authors:  Jeffrey A Geller; Comron Saifi; Todd A Morrison; William Macaulay
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2009-07-18       Impact factor: 3.075

9.  Dynamic hip screw with trochanteric stabilizing plate in the treatment of unstable proximal femoral fractures: a comparative study with the Gamma nail and compression hip screw.

Authors:  J E Madsen; L Naess; A K Aune; A Alho; A Ekeland; K Strømsøe
Journal:  J Orthop Trauma       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 2.512

Review 10.  Gamma and other cephalocondylic intramedullary nails versus extramedullary implants for extracapsular hip fractures in adults.

Authors:  Martyn J Parker; Helen H G Handoll
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2008-07-16
View more
  62 in total

1.  Comment on Stern et al.: Prospective randomised study comparing screw versus helical blade in the treatment of low-energy trochanteric fractures.

Authors:  Ramprasad Kancherla; Sukesh Sankineni; Vivek Trikha; Ramakant Kumar; Rajesh Malhotra
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2012-02-21       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  Analysis of the micro-migration of sliding hip screws by using point-based registration.

Authors:  Patrik Raudaschl; Karl Fritscher; Tobias Roth; Christian Kammerlander; Rainer Schubert
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2010-06-23       Impact factor: 2.924

3.  Correlation between femoral offset loss and dynamic hip screw cut-out complications after pertrochanteric fractures: a case-control study.

Authors:  Baptiste Boukebous; Pascal Guillon; Eric Vandenbussche; Marc Antoine Rousseau
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2018-04-27

4.  Prospective randomised study comparing screw versus helical blade in the treatment of low-energy trochanteric fractures.

Authors:  Richard Stern; Anne Lübbeke; Domizio Suva; Hermes Miozzari; Pierre Hoffmeyer
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2011-03-10       Impact factor: 3.075

5.  Neck of femur fracture fixation in a bilateral amputee: an uncommon condition requiring an improvised fracture table positioning technique.

Authors:  Andrew James Berg; Chandra Bhatia
Journal:  BMJ Case Rep       Date:  2014-02-21

6.  How to prevent cut-out and cut-through in biaxial proximal femoral nails: is there anything beyond lag screw positioning and tip-apex distance?

Authors:  Birgit Zirngibl; Roland Biber; Hermann Josef Bail
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2013-05-07       Impact factor: 3.075

7.  The incidence of life threatening iatrogenic vessel injury following closed or open reduction and internal fixation of intertrochanteric femoral factures.

Authors:  David Segal; Eyal Yaacobi; Niv Marom; Victor Feldman; Elhan Aliev; Ezequiel Palmanovich; Gabriel Bartal; Yaron S Brin
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2017-07-01       Impact factor: 3.075

8.  Is helical blade superior to screw design in terms of cut-out rate for elderly trochanteric fractures? A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Xiao Huang; Frankie Leung; Ming Liu; Long Chen; Zhao Xu; Zhou Xiang
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2014-02-21

Review 9.  Is rotation the mode of failure in pertrochanteric fractures fixed with nails? Theoretical approach and illustrative cases.

Authors:  C Kokoroghiannis; D Vasilakos; K Zisis; G Dimitriou; E Pappa; D Evangelopoulos
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2019-09-20

Review 10.  Intertrochanteric fractures: a review of fixation methods.

Authors:  Senthil Nathan Sambandam; Jayadev Chandrasekharan; Varatharaj Mounasamy; Cyril Mauffrey
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2016-03-30
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.