Literature DB >> 19603858

Use of forward pressure level to minimize the influence of acoustic standing waves during probe-microphone hearing-aid verification.

Ryan W McCreery1, Andrea Pittman, James Lewis, Stephen T Neely, Patricia G Stelmachowicz.   

Abstract

Probe-microphone measurements are a reliable method of verifying hearing-aid sound pressure level (SPL) in the ear canal for frequencies between 0.25 and 4 kHz. However, standing waves in the ear canal reduce the accuracy of these measurements above 4 kHz. Recent data suggest that speech information at frequencies up to 10 kHz may enhance speech perception, particularly for children. Incident and reflected components of a stimulus in the ear canal can be separated, allowing the use of forward (incident) pressure as a measure of stimulus level. Two experiments were conducted to determine if hearing-aid output in forward pressure provides valid estimates of in-situ sound level in the ear canal. In experiment 1, SPL measurements were obtained at the tympanic membrane and the medial end of an earmold in ten adults. While within-subject test-retest reliability was acceptable, measures near the tympanic membrane reduced the influence of standing waves for two of the ten participants. In experiment 2, forward pressure measurements were found to be unaffected by standing waves in the ear canal for frequencies up to 10 kHz. Implications for clinical assessment of amplification are discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19603858      PMCID: PMC2723899          DOI: 10.1121/1.3143142

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  25 in total

1.  Acoustic intensity, impedance and reflection coefficient in the human ear canal.

Authors:  B L Farmer-Fedor; R D Rabbitt
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Perceived naturalness of spectrally distorted speech and music.

Authors:  Brian C J Moore; Chin-Tuan Tan
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Acoustics of ear canal measurement of eardrum SPL in simulators.

Authors:  S Gilman; D D Dirks
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1986-09       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Basic acoustic considerations of ear canal probe measurements.

Authors:  D D Dirks; G E Kincaid
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  1987-10       Impact factor: 3.570

5.  Specification of the acoustical input to the ear at high frequencies.

Authors:  S M Khanna; M R Stinson
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1985-02       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  A probe earmold system for measuring eardrum SPL under hearing-aid conditions.

Authors:  S Gilman; D D Dirks
Journal:  Scand Audiol       Date:  1984

7.  Probe-determined hearing-aid gain compared to functional and coupler gains.

Authors:  J Zemplenyi; D Dirks; S Gilman
Journal:  J Speech Hear Res       Date:  1985-09

8.  Evaluation of high-fidelity hearing aids.

Authors:  M C Killion; T W Tillman
Journal:  J Speech Hear Res       Date:  1982-03

9.  Estimation of acoustical energy reflectance at the eardrum from measurements of pressure distribution in the human ear canal.

Authors:  M R Stinson; E A Shaw; B W Lawton
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1982-09       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Sound pressure in insert earphone couplers and real ears.

Authors:  M D Burkhard; R M Sachs
Journal:  J Speech Hear Res       Date:  1977-12
View more
  9 in total

1.  Further assessment of forward pressure level for in situ calibration.

Authors:  Rachel A Scheperle; Shawn S Goodman; Stephen T Neely
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Comparison of in-situ calibration methods for quantifying input to the middle ear.

Authors:  James D Lewis; Ryan W McCreery; Stephen T Neely; Patricia G Stelmachowicz
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Specification of absorbed-sound power in the ear canal: application to suppression of stimulus frequency otoacoustic emissions.

Authors:  Douglas H Keefe; Kim S Schairer
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Quantifying undesired parallel components in Thévenin-equivalent acoustic source parameters.

Authors:  Kren Rahbek Nørgaard; Stephen T Neely; Daniel M Rasetshwane
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2018-03       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  A comparison of ear-canal-reflectance measurement methods in an ear simulator.

Authors:  Kren Rahbek Nørgaard; Karolina K Charaziak; Christopher A Shera
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2019-08       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  On the calculation of reflectance in non-uniform ear canals.

Authors:  Kren Rahbek Nørgaard; Karolina K Charaziak; Christopher A Shera
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2019-08       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 7.  Alternative ear-canal measures related to absorbance.

Authors:  Stephen T Neely; Stefan Stenfelt; Kim S Schairer
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 3.570

8.  A systematic study on effects of calibration-waveguide geometry and least-squares formulation on ear-probe source calibrations.

Authors:  Kren Monrad Nørgaard; Joshua J Hajicek
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2022-01       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  An in-situ calibration method and the effects on stimulus frequency otoacoustic emissions.

Authors:  Shixiong Chen; Haoshi Zhang; Lan Wang; Guanglin Li
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2014-07-08       Impact factor: 2.819

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.