Literature DB >> 29604709

Quantifying undesired parallel components in Thévenin-equivalent acoustic source parameters.

Kren Rahbek Nørgaard1, Stephen T Neely2, Daniel M Rasetshwane2.   

Abstract

The calibration of an ear probe to determine its Thévenin-equivalent acoustic source parameters facilitates the measurement of ear-canal impedance and reflectance. Existing calibration error metrics, used to evaluate the quality of a calibration, are unable to reveal undesired parallel components in the source parameters. Such parallel components can result from, e.g., a leak in the ear tip or improperly accounting for evanescent modes, and introduce errors into subsequent measurements of impedance and reflectance. This paper proposes a set of additional error metrics that are capable of detecting such parallel components by examining the causality of the source admittance in the frequency domain and estimating the source pressure in the time domain. The proposed and existing error metrics are applied to four different calibrations using two existing calibration methods, representing typical use cases and introducing deliberate parallel components. The results demonstrate the capability of the proposed error metrics in identifying various undesired components in the source parameters that might otherwise go undetected.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29604709      PMCID: PMC5856597          DOI: 10.1121/1.5026796

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  20 in total

1.  Estimating the acoustic reflex threshold from wideband measures of reflectance, admittance, and power.

Authors:  M P Feeney; D H Keefe
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 3.570

2.  Inverse solution of ear-canal area function from reflectance.

Authors:  Daniel M Rasetshwane; Stephen T Neely
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Method to measure acoustic impedance and reflection coefficient.

Authors:  D H Keefe; R Ling; J C Bulen
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1992-01       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  An in situ calibration for hearing thresholds.

Authors:  Robert H Withnell; Patricia S Jeng; Kelly Waldvogel; Kari Morgenstein; Jont B Allen
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Comparison of in-situ calibration methods for quantifying input to the middle ear.

Authors:  James D Lewis; Ryan W McCreery; Stephen T Neely; Patricia G Stelmachowicz
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Comparison of nine methods to estimate ear-canal stimulus levels.

Authors:  Natalie N Souza; Sumitrajit Dhar; Stephen T Neely; Jonathan H Siegel
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Incorporating evanescent modes and flow losses into reference impedances in acoustic Thévenin calibration.

Authors:  Kren Rahbek Nørgaard; Efren Fernandez-Grande; Søren Laugesen
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Measurement of acoustic impedance and reflectance in the human ear canal.

Authors:  S E Voss; J B Allen
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1994-01       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Identification of neonatal hearing impairment: ear-canal measurements of acoustic admittance and reflectance in neonates.

Authors:  D H Keefe; R C Folsom; M P Gorga; B R Vohr; J C Bulen; S J Norton
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 3.570

10.  Wideband aural acoustic absorbance predicts conductive hearing loss in children.

Authors:  Douglas H Keefe; Chris A Sanford; John C Ellison; Denis F Fitzpatrick; Michael P Gorga
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2012-10-16       Impact factor: 2.117

View more
  7 in total

1.  Sound pressure distribution within human ear canals: II. Reverse mechanical stimulation.

Authors:  Michael E Ravicz; Jeffrey Tao Cheng; John J Rosowski
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2019-03       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Evanescent waves in simulated ear canals: Experimental demonstration and method for compensation.

Authors:  Jonathan H Siegel; Kren Rahbek Nørgaard; Stephen T Neely
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Effects of Forward- and Emitted-Pressure Calibrations on the Variability of Otoacoustic Emission Measurements Across Repeated Probe Fits.

Authors:  Tom Maxim; Christopher A Shera; Karolina K Charaziak; Carolina Abdala
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2019 Nov/Dec       Impact factor: 3.570

4.  A comparison of ear-canal-reflectance measurement methods in an ear simulator.

Authors:  Kren Rahbek Nørgaard; Karolina K Charaziak; Christopher A Shera
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2019-08       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  On the calculation of reflectance in non-uniform ear canals.

Authors:  Kren Rahbek Nørgaard; Karolina K Charaziak; Christopher A Shera
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2019-08       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Medial olivocochlear reflex effects on amplitude growth functions of long- and short-latency components of click-evoked otoacoustic emissions in humans.

Authors:  Shawn S Goodman; Sriram Boothalingam; Jeffery T Lichtenhan
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2021-02-24       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  A systematic study on effects of calibration-waveguide geometry and least-squares formulation on ear-probe source calibrations.

Authors:  Kren Monrad Nørgaard; Joshua J Hajicek
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2022-01       Impact factor: 1.840

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.