Literature DB >> 23900185

Alternative ear-canal measures related to absorbance.

Stephen T Neely1, Stefan Stenfelt, Kim S Schairer.   

Abstract

Several alternative ear-canal measures are similar to absorbance in their requirement for prior determination of a Thévenin-equivalent sound source. Examples are (1) sound intensity level, (2) forward pressure level, (3) time-domain ear-canal reflectance, and (4) cochlear reflectance. These four related measures are similar to absorbance in their utilization of wideband stimuli and their focus on recording ear-canal sound pressure. The related measures differ from absorbance in how the ear-canal pressure is analyzed and in the type of information that is extracted from the recorded response. Sound intensity level and forward pressure level have both been shown to be better as measures of sound level in the ear canal compared with sound pressure level because they reduced calibration errors due to standing waves in studies of behavioral thresholds and otoacoustic emissions. Time-domain ear-canal reflectance may be used to estimate ear-canal geometry and may have the potential to assess middle ear pathology. Cochlear reflectance reveals information about the inner ear that is similar to what is provided by other types of otoacoustic emissions, and may have theoretical advantages that strengthen its interpretation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23900185      PMCID: PMC3767433          DOI: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e31829c7229

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ear Hear        ISSN: 0196-0202            Impact factor:   3.570


  20 in total

1.  Inverse solution of ear-canal area function from reflectance.

Authors:  Daniel M Rasetshwane; Stephen T Neely
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Method to measure acoustic impedance and reflection coefficient.

Authors:  D H Keefe; R Ling; J C Bulen
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1992-01       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Comparison of in-situ calibration methods for quantifying input to the middle ear.

Authors:  James D Lewis; Ryan W McCreery; Stephen T Neely; Patricia G Stelmachowicz
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  The level and growth behavior of the 2 f1-f2 distortion product otoacoustic emission and its relationship to auditory sensitivity in normal hearing and cochlear hearing loss.

Authors:  P Kummer; T Janssen; W Arnold
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 5.  Evoked otoacoustic emissions arise by two fundamentally different mechanisms: a taxonomy for mammalian OAEs.

Authors:  C A Shera; J J Guinan
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Specification of absorbed-sound power in the ear canal: application to suppression of stimulus frequency otoacoustic emissions.

Authors:  Douglas H Keefe; Kim S Schairer
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Sound-pressure measurements in the cochlear vestibule of human-cadaver ears.

Authors:  S Puria; W T Peake; J J Rosowski
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1997-05       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Do "optimal" conditions improve distortion product otoacoustic emission test performance?

Authors:  Benjamin J Kirby; Judy G Kopun; Hongyang Tan; Stephen T Neely; Michael P Gorga
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2011 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.570

9.  Specification of the geometry of the human ear canal for the prediction of sound-pressure level distribution.

Authors:  M R Stinson; B W Lawton
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1989-06       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Measurement of acoustic impedance and reflectance in the human ear canal.

Authors:  S E Voss; J B Allen
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1994-01       Impact factor: 1.840

View more
  2 in total

1.  Analysis of wideband tympanometry in Ménière's disease.

Authors:  Gisela Andrea Yamashita Tanno; Mônica Alcantara de Oliveira Santos; Marcelo Tabosa Dutra Sanches; Alessandra Spada Durante; Kátia de Almeida; Marcella Scigliano Gameiro; Nayara Michelle Costa de Freitas Roque; Osmar Mesquita de Sousa Neto
Journal:  Braz J Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2020-07-21

2.  Air-leak effects on ear-canal acoustic absorbance.

Authors:  Katherine A Groon; Daniel M Rasetshwane; Judy G Kopun; Michael P Gorga; Stephen T Neely
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 3.570

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.