Literature DB >> 12186041

Acoustic intensity, impedance and reflection coefficient in the human ear canal.

B L Farmer-Fedor1, R D Rabbitt.   

Abstract

The sound power per unit cross-sectional area was determined in human ear canals using a new method based on measuring the pressure distribution (P) along the length of variable cross-section acoustic waveguides. The technique provides the pressure/power reflection coefficients (R/R) as well as the acoustic intensity of the nonplanar incident wave (I+, the acoustic input to the ear) and the nonplanar outgoing wave (I-, the acoustic output of the ear). Results were compared to the classical acoustic impedance (Z) and associated plane-wave power reflection coefficient (R(Z)). Performance of the method was investigated theoretically using horn equation simulations and evaluated experimentally using pressure data recorded in nonuniform waveguides. The method was applied in normal-hearing young adults to determine ear-canal position- and frequency-dependence of I(+/-), R, and R(Z) using random phase broadband stimuli (1-15 kHz; approximately 75 dB SPL). Reflection coefficient (R) measurements at two different locations within individual human ear canals exhibited a position dependence averaging deltaR approximately 0.1 (over 6 mm distance)--a difference consistent with predictions of inviscid acoustics in nonuniform waveguides. Since this position dependence was relatively small, an "optimized" position-independent reflection coefficient was defined to facilitate practical application and intersubject comparisons.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12186041     DOI: 10.1121/1.1494445

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  29 in total

1.  Reflectance of acoustic horns and solution of the inverse problem.

Authors:  Daniel M Rasetshwane; Stephen T Neely; Jont B Allen; Christopher A Shera
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Non-invasive estimation of middle-ear input impedance and efficiency.

Authors:  James D Lewis; Stephen T Neely
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  An analysis of the acoustic input impedance of the ear.

Authors:  Robert H Withnell; Lauren E Gowdy
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2013-08-06

4.  Normative Wideband Reflectance, Equivalent Admittance at the Tympanic Membrane, and Acoustic Stapedius Reflex Threshold in Adults.

Authors:  M Patrick Feeney; Douglas H Keefe; Lisa L Hunter; Denis F Fitzpatrick; Angela C Garinis; Daniel B Putterman; Garnett P McMillan
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2017 May/Jun       Impact factor: 3.570

5.  Comparison of in-situ calibration methods for quantifying input to the middle ear.

Authors:  James D Lewis; Ryan W McCreery; Stephen T Neely; Patricia G Stelmachowicz
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Specification of absorbed-sound power in the ear canal: application to suppression of stimulus frequency otoacoustic emissions.

Authors:  Douglas H Keefe; Kim S Schairer
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Comparison of nine methods to estimate ear-canal stimulus levels.

Authors:  Natalie N Souza; Sumitrajit Dhar; Stephen T Neely; Jonathan H Siegel
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Chinchilla middle-ear admittance and sound power: high-frequency estimates and effects of inner-ear modifications.

Authors:  Michael E Ravicz; John J Rosowski
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Use of forward pressure level to minimize the influence of acoustic standing waves during probe-microphone hearing-aid verification.

Authors:  Ryan W McCreery; Andrea Pittman; James Lewis; Stephen T Neely; Patricia G Stelmachowicz
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Characterizing the ear canal acoustic impedance and reflectance by pole-zero fitting.

Authors:  Sarah R Robinson; Cac T Nguyen; Jont B Allen
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2013-03-22       Impact factor: 3.208

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.