Literature DB >> 31472574

On the calculation of reflectance in non-uniform ear canals.

Kren Rahbek Nørgaard1, Karolina K Charaziak2, Christopher A Shera2.   

Abstract

Ear-canal reflectance is useful for quantifying the conductive status of the middle ear because it can be measured non-invasively at a distance from the tympanic membrane. Deriving the ear-canal reflectance requires decomposing the total acoustic pressure into its forward- and reverse-propagating components. This decomposition is conveniently achieved using formulas that involve the input and characteristic impedances of the ear canal. The characteristic impedance is defined as the ratio of sound pressure to volume flow of a propagating wave and, for uniform waveguides, the plane-wave characteristic impedance is a real-valued constant. However, in non-uniform waveguides, the characteristic impedances are complex-valued quantities, depend on the direction of propagation, and more accurately characterize a propagating wave in a non-uniform ear canal. In this paper, relevant properties of the plane-wave and spherical-wave characteristic impedances are reviewed. In addition, the utility of the plane-wave and spherical-wave reflectances in representing the reflection occurring due to the middle ear, calibrating stimulus levels, and characterizing the emitted pressure in simulated non-uniform ear canals is investigated and compared.

Year:  2019        PMID: 31472574      PMCID: PMC6713557          DOI: 10.1121/1.5124000

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  23 in total

1.  Prediction of conductive hearing loss based on acoustic ear-canal response using a multivariate clinical decision theory.

Authors:  P Piskorski; D H Keefe; J L Simmons; M P Gorga
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Estimating the acoustic reflex threshold from wideband measures of reflectance, admittance, and power.

Authors:  M P Feeney; D H Keefe
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 3.570

3.  Acoustic intensity, impedance and reflection coefficient in the human ear canal.

Authors:  B L Farmer-Fedor; R D Rabbitt
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Acoustical Impedance and the Theory of Horns and of the Phonograph.

Authors:  A G Webster
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1919-07       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Method to measure acoustic impedance and reflection coefficient.

Authors:  D H Keefe; R Ling; J C Bulen
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1992-01       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  An in situ calibration for hearing thresholds.

Authors:  Robert H Withnell; Patricia S Jeng; Kelly Waldvogel; Kari Morgenstein; Jont B Allen
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Comparison of in-situ calibration methods for quantifying input to the middle ear.

Authors:  James D Lewis; Ryan W McCreery; Stephen T Neely; Patricia G Stelmachowicz
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Identification of neonatal hearing impairment: ear-canal measurements of acoustic admittance and reflectance in neonates.

Authors:  D H Keefe; R C Folsom; M P Gorga; B R Vohr; J C Bulen; S J Norton
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 3.570

9.  Use of forward pressure level to minimize the influence of acoustic standing waves during probe-microphone hearing-aid verification.

Authors:  Ryan W McCreery; Andrea Pittman; James Lewis; Stephen T Neely; Patricia G Stelmachowicz
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Influence of in situ, sound-level calibration on distortion-product otoacoustic emission variability.

Authors:  Rachel A Scheperle; Stephen T Neely; Judy G Kopun; Michael P Gorga
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 1.840

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.