Literature DB >> 8023031

Advances in statistical methodology for the evaluation of diagnostic and laboratory tests.

G Campbell1.   

Abstract

The ROC plot is a useful tool in the evaluation of the performance of medical tests for separating two populations. For a two-state decision rule based on such a test, the ROC plot is the graph of all observed (1-specificity, sensitivity) pairs. Each point on this empirical plot can be represented by a 2 x 2 contingency table. The non-parametric statistics of Mann-Whitney and Kolmogorov-Smirnov can be immediately identified on this plot. Local non-parametric confidence interval procedures related to the theoretical ROC curve are briefly reviewed. For continuous data, two new simultaneous confidence regions associated with the ROC curve are presented, one based on Kolmogorov-Smirnov confidence bands for distribution functions and the other based on bootstrapping. Two different tests on the same patients can be compared on the ROC scale. For continuous data, one important problem concerns the comparison of two ROC plots (as would arise from two correlated diagnostic tests on each patient) using a sup norm (this metric can detect differences that the ROC area cannot). The distribution of a statistic based on this norm is studied, using the bootstrap. A biomedical example illustrates the methodologies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8023031     DOI: 10.1002/sim.4780130513

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stat Med        ISSN: 0277-6715            Impact factor:   2.373


  35 in total

1.  Is there epidemiology in Russia?

Authors:  V Vlassov
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 3.710

2.  Bayesian multivariate hierarchical transformation models for ROC analysis.

Authors:  A James O'Malley; Kelly H Zou
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2006-02-15       Impact factor: 2.373

3.  A Bayesian hierarchical non-linear regression model in receiver operating characteristic analysis of clustered continuous diagnostic data.

Authors:  Kelly H Zou; A James O'Malley
Journal:  Biom J       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 2.207

4.  Cytokine comparisons between women with breast cancer and women with a negative breast biopsy.

Authors:  Debra E Lyon; Nancy L McCain; Jeanne Walter; Christine Schubert
Journal:  Nurs Res       Date:  2008 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.381

5.  Comparison between SAPS II and SAPS 3 in predicting hospital mortality in a cohort of 103 Italian ICUs. Is new always better?

Authors:  Daniele Poole; Carlotta Rossi; Nicola Latronico; Giancarlo Rossi; Stefano Finazzi; Guido Bertolini
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2012-05-15       Impact factor: 17.440

6.  The value of pattern capillary changes and antibodies to predict the development of systemic sclerosis in patients with primary Raynaud's phenomenon.

Authors:  Slavica R Pavlov-Dolijanovic; Nemanja S Damjanov; Nada Z Vujasinovic Stupar; Snezana Baltic; Dragan D Babic
Journal:  Rheumatol Int       Date:  2013-08-11       Impact factor: 2.631

7.  Three-Factor Versus Four-Factor Prothrombin Complex Concentrate for the Emergent Management of Warfarin-Associated Intracranial Hemorrhage.

Authors:  Daniel Fischer; Jeffrey Sorensen; Gabriel V Fontaine
Journal:  Neurocrit Care       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 3.210

8.  A new method of screening for diabetic neuropathy using laser Doppler and photoplethysmography.

Authors:  Sung Woo Kim; Soo Chan Kim; Ki Chang Nam; Eun Seok Kang; Jae Jung Im; Deok Won Kim
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2007-10-10       Impact factor: 2.602

9.  Three validation metrics for automated probabilistic image segmentation of brain tumours.

Authors:  Kelly H Zou; William M Wells; Ron Kikinis; Simon K Warfield
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2004-04-30       Impact factor: 2.373

10.  Evaluation of North American antibody detection tests for diagnosis of brucellosis in goats.

Authors:  A B Mikolon; I A Gardner; S K Hietala; J Hernandez de Anda; E Chamizo Pestaña; S G Hennager; A J Edmondson
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 5.948

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.