Literature DB >> 20825391

Robust estimation of area under ROC curve using auxiliary variables in the presence of missing biomarker values.

Qi Long1, Xiaoxi Zhang, Brent A Johnson.   

Abstract

In medical research, the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves can be used to evaluate the performance of biomarkers for diagnosing diseases or predicting the risk of developing a disease in the future. The area under the ROC curve (ROC AUC), as a summary measure of ROC curves, is widely utilized, especially when comparing multiple ROC curves. In observational studies, the estimation of the AUC is often complicated by the presence of missing biomarker values, which means that the existing estimators of the AUC are potentially biased. In this article, we develop robust statistical methods for estimating the ROC AUC and the proposed methods use information from auxiliary variables that are potentially predictive of the missingness of the biomarkers or the missing biomarker values. We are particularly interested in auxiliary variables that are predictive of the missing biomarker values. In the case of missing at random (MAR), that is, missingness of biomarker values only depends on the observed data, our estimators have the attractive feature of being consistent if one correctly specifies, conditional on auxiliary variables and disease status, either the model for the probabilities of being missing or the model for the biomarker values. In the case of missing not at random (MNAR), that is, missingness may depend on the unobserved biomarker values, we propose a sensitivity analysis to assess the impact of MNAR on the estimation of the ROC AUC. The asymptotic properties of the proposed estimators are studied and their finite-sample behaviors are evaluated in simulation studies. The methods are further illustrated using data from a study of maternal depression during pregnancy.
© 2010, The International Biometric Society.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20825391      PMCID: PMC8162996          DOI: 10.1111/j.1541-0420.2010.01487.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biometrics        ISSN: 0006-341X            Impact factor:   2.571


  12 in total

1.  Accounting for nonignorable verification bias in assessment of diagnostic tests.

Authors:  Andrzej S Kosinski; Huiman X Barnhart
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 2.571

2.  Analysis of semi-parametric regression models with non-ignorable non-response.

Authors:  A Rotnitzky; J Robins
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1997 Jan 15-Feb 15       Impact factor: 2.373

3.  Validation of the Maltese version of the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale.

Authors:  E Felice; J Saliba; V Grech; J Cox
Journal:  Arch Womens Ment Health       Date:  2005-09-19       Impact factor: 3.633

Review 4.  Receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) plots: a fundamental evaluation tool in clinical medicine.

Authors:  M H Zweig; G Campbell
Journal:  Clin Chem       Date:  1993-04       Impact factor: 8.327

Review 5.  Postpartum depression: identification, screening, and treatment.

Authors:  Jennifer Perfetti; Roseanne Clark; Capri-Mara Fillmore
Journal:  WMJ       Date:  2004

6.  Improving efficiency and robustness of the doubly robust estimator for a population mean with incomplete data.

Authors:  Weihua Cao; Anastasios A Tsiatis; Marie Davidian
Journal:  Biometrika       Date:  2009-08-07       Impact factor: 2.445

7.  Detection of postnatal depression. Development of the 10-item Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale.

Authors:  J L Cox; J M Holden; R Sagovsky
Journal:  Br J Psychiatry       Date:  1987-06       Impact factor: 9.319

8.  Effect of verification bias on positive and negative predictive values.

Authors:  X H Zhou
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1994-09-15       Impact factor: 2.373

Review 9.  Correcting for verification bias in studies of a diagnostic test's accuracy.

Authors:  X H Zhou
Journal:  Stat Methods Med Res       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 3.021

10.  Estimation of the ROC curve under verification bias.

Authors:  Ronen Fluss; Benjamin Reiser; David Faraggi; Andrea Rotnitzky
Journal:  Biom J       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 2.207

View more
  6 in total

1.  Introduction to Double Robust Methods for Incomplete Data.

Authors:  Shaun R Seaman; Stijn Vansteelandt
Journal:  Stat Sci       Date:  2018       Impact factor: 2.901

2.  Addressing issues associated with evaluating prediction models for survival endpoints based on the concordance statistic.

Authors:  Ming Wang; Qi Long
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2016-01-12       Impact factor: 2.571

3.  Sensitivity to imputation models and assumptions in receiver operating characteristic analysis with incomplete data.

Authors:  Jale Karakaya; Erdem Karabulut; Recai M Yucel
Journal:  J Stat Comput Simul       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 1.424

4.  Nonparametric multiple imputation for receiver operating characteristics analysis when some biomarker values are missing at random.

Authors:  Qi Long; Xiaoxi Zhang; Chiu-Hsieh Hsu
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2011-11-20       Impact factor: 2.373

5.  A unified Bayesian framework for exact inference of area under the receiver operating characteristic curve.

Authors:  Ruitao Lin; Kc Gary Chan; Haolun Shi
Journal:  Stat Methods Med Res       Date:  2021-09-01       Impact factor: 2.494

6.  Evaluation of predictive model performance of an existing model in the presence of missing data.

Authors:  Pin Li; Jeremy M G Taylor; Daniel E Spratt; R Jeffery Karnes; Matthew J Schipper
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2021-04-11       Impact factor: 2.497

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.