Literature DB >> 10404199

Neural bases of an auditory illusion and its elimination in owls.

K Saberi1, Y Takahashi, H Farahbod, M Konishi.   

Abstract

Humans and owls localize sounds by detecting the arrival time disparity between the ears. Both species determine the interaural time difference by finding the delay necessary to match the leading signal with the lagging one. This method produces ambiguity with periodic signals, because the two signals can be matched by delaying either one or the other. As predicted, owls localized periodic signals in illusory directions, whereas they always perceived the real source when signal bandwidth exceeded a certain value. This bandwidth also enabled higher-order auditory neurons to discriminate between real and illusory sources.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10404199     DOI: 10.1038/10212

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nat Neurosci        ISSN: 1097-6256            Impact factor:   24.884


  17 in total

Review 1.  Creating a sense of auditory space.

Authors:  David McAlpine
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2005-03-10       Impact factor: 5.182

2.  Comparison of midbrain and thalamic space-specific neurons in barn owls.

Authors:  María Lucía Pérez; José Luis Peña
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Sensitivity to interaural time difference and representation of azimuth in central nucleus of inferior colliculus in the barn owl.

Authors:  Peter Bremen; Iris Poganiatz; Mark von Campenhausen; Hermann Wagner
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2006-09-26       Impact factor: 1.836

4.  Preservation of spectrotemporal tuning between the nucleus laminaris and the inferior colliculus of the barn owl.

Authors:  G Björn Christianson; José Luis Peña
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2007-02-21       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Side peak suppression in responses of an across-frequency integration model to stimuli of varying bandwidth as demonstrated analytically and by implementation.

Authors:  Tom Goeckel; Hartmut Führ; Gerhard Lakemeyer; Hermann Wagner
Journal:  J Comput Neurosci       Date:  2013-05-29       Impact factor: 1.621

6.  Auditory spatial tuning at the crossroads of the midbrain and forebrain.

Authors:  M Lucía Pérez; Sharad J Shanbhag; José Luis Peña
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2009-07-01       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 7.  Sound localization in the alligator.

Authors:  Hilary S Bierman; Catherine E Carr
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2015-06-03       Impact factor: 3.208

8.  Target-approaching behavior of barn owls (Tyto alba): influence of sound frequency.

Authors:  Martin Singheiser; Dennis T T Plachta; Sandra Brill; Peter Bremen; Robert F van der Willigen; Hermann Wagner
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2010-02-07       Impact factor: 1.836

9.  Envelope contributions to the representation of interaural time difference in the forebrain of barn owls.

Authors:  Philipp Tellers; Jessica Lehmann; Hartmut Führ; Hermann Wagner
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2017-07-05       Impact factor: 2.714

10.  Improvements of sound localization abilities by the facial ruff of the barn owl (Tyto alba) as demonstrated by virtual ruff removal.

Authors:  Laura Hausmann; Mark von Campenhausen; Frank Endler; Martin Singheiser; Hermann Wagner
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-11-05       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.