Literature DB >> 20554842

Role of the zebra finch auditory thalamus in generating complex representations for natural sounds.

Noopur Amin1, Patrick Gill, Frédéric E Theunissen.   

Abstract

We estimated the spectrotemporal receptive fields of neurons in the songbird auditory thalamus, nucleus ovoidalis, and compared the neural representation of complex sounds in the auditory thalamus to those found in the upstream auditory midbrain nucleus, mesencephalicus lateralis dorsalis (MLd), and the downstream auditory pallial region, field L. Our data refute the idea that the primary sensory thalamus acts as a simple, relay nucleus: we find that the auditory thalamic receptive fields obtained in response to song are more complex than the ones found in the midbrain. Moreover, we find that linear tuning diversity and complexity in ovoidalis (Ov) are closer to those found in field L than in MLd. We also find prevalent tuning to intermediate spectral and temporal modulations, a feature that is unique to Ov. Thus even a feed-forward model of the sensory processing chain, where neural responses in the sensory thalamus reveals intermediate response properties between those in the sensory periphery and those in the primary sensory cortex, is inadequate in describing the tuning found in Ov. Based on these results, we believe that the auditory thalamic circuitry plays an important role in generating novel complex representations for specific features found in natural sounds.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20554842      PMCID: PMC2934935          DOI: 10.1152/jn.00128.2010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  76 in total

Review 1.  The role of the thalamus in the flow of information to the cortex.

Authors:  S Murray Sherman; R W Guillery
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2002-12-29       Impact factor: 6.237

2.  Gabor analysis of auditory midbrain receptive fields: spectro-temporal and binaural composition.

Authors:  Anqi Qiu; Christoph E Schreiner; Monty A Escabí
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2003-03-26       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Processing of low-probability sounds by cortical neurons.

Authors:  Nachum Ulanovsky; Liora Las; Israel Nelken
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 24.884

4.  Nonlinearities and contextual influences in auditory cortical responses modeled with multilinear spectrotemporal methods.

Authors:  Misha B Ahrens; Jennifer F Linden; Maneesh Sahani
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2008-02-20       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  What's that sound? Auditory area CLM encodes stimulus surprise, not intensity or intensity changes.

Authors:  Patrick Gill; Sarah M N Woolley; Thane Fremouw; Frédéric E Theunissen
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2008-02-20       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Corticothalamic feedback for sound-specific plasticity of auditory thalamic neurons elicited by tones paired with basal forebrain stimulation.

Authors:  Yunfeng Zhang; Jun Yan
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2008-01-17       Impact factor: 5.357

7.  Tuning to interaural time difference and frequency differs between the auditory arcopallium and the external nucleus of the inferior colliculus.

Authors:  Katrin Vonderschen; Hermann Wagner
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2009-03-04       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  Organizing principles of spectro-temporal encoding in the avian primary auditory area field L.

Authors:  Katherine I Nagel; Allison J Doupe
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2008-06-26       Impact factor: 17.173

9.  Functional groups in the avian auditory system.

Authors:  Sarah M N Woolley; Patrick R Gill; Thane Fremouw; Frédéric E Theunissen
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2009-03-04       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  Auditory cortical detection and discrimination correlates with communicative significance.

Authors:  Robert C Liu; Christoph E Schreiner
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2007-06-12       Impact factor: 8.029

View more
  14 in total

1.  Heterogeneous organization and connectivity of the chicken auditory thalamus (Gallus gallus).

Authors:  Yuan Wang; Diego A R Zorio; Harvey J Karten
Journal:  J Comp Neurol       Date:  2017-07-13       Impact factor: 3.215

2.  Estradiol-dependent modulation of serotonergic markers in auditory areas of a seasonally breeding songbird.

Authors:  Lisa L Matragrano; Sara E Sanford; Katrina G Salvante; Michaël Beaulieu; Keith W Sockman; Donna L Maney
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  2011-09-26       Impact factor: 1.912

Review 3.  Neural processing of natural sounds.

Authors:  Frédéric E Theunissen; Julie E Elie
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 34.870

4.  Organized representation of spectrotemporal features in songbird auditory forebrain.

Authors:  Gunsoo Kim; Allison Doupe
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2011-11-23       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  A robust and biologically plausible spike pattern recognition network.

Authors:  Eric Larson; Ben P Perrone; Kamal Sen; Cyrus P Billimoria
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2010-11-17       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Experience dependence of neural responses to different classes of male songs in the primary auditory forebrain of female songbirds.

Authors:  Mark E Hauber; Sarah M N Woolley; Phillip Cassey; Frédéric E Theunissen
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2013-01-15       Impact factor: 3.332

7.  Developmental but not adult cannabinoid treatments persistently alter axonal and dendritic morphology within brain regions important for zebra finch vocal learning.

Authors:  Marcoita T Gilbert; Ken Soderstrom
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2014-03-02       Impact factor: 3.252

8.  A simple algorithm for averaging spike trains.

Authors:  Hannah Julienne; Conor Houghton
Journal:  J Math Neurosci       Date:  2013-02-25       Impact factor: 1.300

9.  An efficient coding hypothesis links sparsity and selectivity of neural responses.

Authors:  Florian Blättler; Richard H R Hahnloser
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-10-13       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 10.  Auditory thalamus dysfunction and pathophysiology in tinnitus: a predictive network hypothesis.

Authors:  Pia Brinkmann; Sonja A Kotz; Jasper V Smit; Marcus L F Janssen; Michael Schwartze
Journal:  Brain Struct Funct       Date:  2021-05-02       Impact factor: 3.270

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.